Can women actually be heterosexual?

Is there such a thing as actually heterosexual women? I am a guy and I love the female form overall. I am attracted to the features and body types women tend to have etc. However, I look at it from the opposite point of view and it seems stupid. I think dude look hideous in general and I never know what women see in us if anything as far as beauty goes. If I were a woman, I am sure I'd just like women. This leads me to believe that most women are most likely probably neutral. Like are there women who would say "Ew, I hate looking at nude women. I think large asses and curves are gross!" Whereas most men probably dislike male nudity. Not in a "wow thats gay man!" kind of way but in a more "dude, just put a fricking towel on" annoyed kind of way.

Anyway, can women actually be heterosexual and have you ever met a woman who was obviously completely heterosexual? It honestly seems like A LOT of women are sexual experimenters and have kissed women and done other things with women.

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >someone plaps and cooms inside of that

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Most emotionally mature functioning adults with active social lives can appreciate the beauty of both genders without being sexually attracted to both and aren't bothered by non sexual nudity

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Ignoring your moron logic, it is all Freudian psychosexual development. Babies that dont like boobies dont feed and die. Babies that dont suck dick dont die. Natural selection. Plus . People appreciate the bodies of healthy members of the same sex as a role model. If they dont, they are probably closet gay and overcompensating like a gay priest praying the gay away.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Not OP, but the aversion to men being gay is way too common for it to all just be closeted gays feeling that way.
        Most likely there's an evolutionary psychology explanation for being actively disgusted by gay men, like it's a way to avoid diseases.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Most likely there's an evolutionary psychology explanation for being actively disgusted by gay men, like it's a way to avoid diseases.
          What disease is associated with two men kissing? Most chuds who are grossed out by it aren't opposed to having anal sex with a woman, which is the risky behavior

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Kissing implies other kinds of intimacy going on at other times. You usually don't just make out with someone romantically only to stop there and not have sex when with that person in private.
            Also anal sex with women isn't that popular. Some guys are into it and even more guys are not into it. If you're generous and only count anyone who's ever tried fricking a girl in the ass (as opposed to limiting to guys who routinely do that) it's still fewer than the number of guys who have never fricked a girl in the ass.
            And all that aside, HIV was originall gay cancer and not anal sex cancer exactly because the risks aren't the same. Gay men are multiple parties with the sex drive of a man going around fricking every other gay man in the neighborhood. And HIV is disproportionately transmitted to the recipient of anal sex rather than the penetrator, for obvious reasons, so if anything women would be at a much higher risk for participating in anal sex and then they'd have no dicks to pass HIV on to anyone else the way a guy fricked in the ass until he's HIV+ would if he turned around and fricked some other guy in the ass.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Lmao thinking that humanity developed homophobia to counter HIV, which is a 40 year old disease is laughable. And HIV transmission among straight people in African countries is extremely high

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >there has never been any other STDs in the history of human existence
            >Africans arent primitive rapists that consider it not gay as long as they are the penetrator

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            There have been plenty of diseases, but you mentioned HIV which was known as the gay disease. And throughout history most people did not associate all the other STDs with gay behavior.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Im not the anon that mentioned aids. They didnt need to knowingly associate gay with disease. Natural selection would kill off gays with diseases and select for an aversion toward gay.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >aren't opposed to having anal sex with a woman
            Those are the closet gays. Think about it. Gays have one choice of hole to stick it in. If you have the choice of straight hole and gay hole and you choose the latter you are a flaming homosexual.

            Not OP, but the aversion to men being gay is way too common for it to all just be closeted gays feeling that way.
            Most likely there's an evolutionary psychology explanation for being actively disgusted by gay men, like it's a way to avoid diseases.

            >avoid diseases
            Probably true to a degree. That would explain why even with the ancient gayreeks and Homans didnt consider it gay as long as you are the penetrator. The penetrator is much less likely to contract a disease than deliver one.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >What disease is associated with two men kissing
            Herpes, hepatitis and syphilis just to name a few spread through kissing. But also imagine trying to convince anyone that all gay men do is kiss when they're notorious giga bawds. No one remember monkey pox?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Herpes, hepatitis and syphilis
            All those diseases are also associated with a man and a woman kissing

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Those among others much worse are much more likely to spread through gay men because they have many more partners and do much more than just kissing.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >imagine trying to convince anyone that all gay men do is kiss
            That wasn't even the argument KEK, I don't know if people here just can't read or are disingenuous

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Your "argument" is literally pretending kissing is all that's being done. If someone's kissing in public it's moronic to expect they're not doing more especially as a gay. You lack common sense.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That wasn't the argument at all, and kissing is not necessarily sexual. British men kiss their mates for fun

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Most aren't kissing other men even if they're friends and gay men are much more likely to do it. Cope.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Most don't even let other guys kiss them on the cheek

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Brits arent particularly well known for the healthiest breeding practices for the species longevity (Habsburgs)

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >there has never been any other STDs in the history of human existence
            >Africans arent primitive rapists that consider it not gay as long as they are the penetrator

            >Well Africans and Brits don't count!!!
            Why would evolution forget those two groups?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It didnt and that is why Africa is riddled with aids and other stds while living worse lives than dogs in first world countries, and why brits teeth like to grow out in every direction they can like its a competition.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            No he actually made a good point there. It goes for men and women. If they are kissing they are fricking. If they are fricking they are spreading even more diseases that are entirely preventable with an instinct for homophobia.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Most likely there's an evolutionary psychology explanation for being actively disgusted by gay men, like it's a way to avoid diseases.
          What disease is associated with two men kissing? Most chuds who are grossed out by it aren't opposed to having anal sex with a woman, which is the risky behavior

          Kissing implies other kinds of intimacy going on at other times. You usually don't just make out with someone romantically only to stop there and not have sex when with that person in private.
          Also anal sex with women isn't that popular. Some guys are into it and even more guys are not into it. If you're generous and only count anyone who's ever tried fricking a girl in the ass (as opposed to limiting to guys who routinely do that) it's still fewer than the number of guys who have never fricked a girl in the ass.
          And all that aside, HIV was originall gay cancer and not anal sex cancer exactly because the risks aren't the same. Gay men are multiple parties with the sex drive of a man going around fricking every other gay man in the neighborhood. And HIV is disproportionately transmitted to the recipient of anal sex rather than the penetrator, for obvious reasons, so if anything women would be at a much higher risk for participating in anal sex and then they'd have no dicks to pass HIV on to anyone else the way a guy fricked in the ass until he's HIV+ would if he turned around and fricked some other guy in the ass.

          >aren't opposed to having anal sex with a woman
          Those are the closet gays. Think about it. Gays have one choice of hole to stick it in. If you have the choice of straight hole and gay hole and you choose the latter you are a flaming homosexual.
          [...]
          >avoid diseases
          Probably true to a degree. That would explain why even with the ancient gayreeks and Homans didnt consider it gay as long as you are the penetrator. The penetrator is much less likely to contract a disease than deliver one.

          Lmao thinking that humanity developed homophobia to counter HIV, which is a 40 year old disease is laughable. And HIV transmission among straight people in African countries is extremely high

          Aversion to homosexuality is just a sign of Talmudic brainwashing. It cannot be biological, because healthy masculine societies praise and revere male love. Only golems hate it.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >homophobia is the work of the joos
            fricking kek

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >like it's a way to avoid diseases
          Bro so many thots have HPV many guys are getting oral herpes from eating pussy. Heterosexual guys aren't immune to STIs either.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Is it valid as a man to say "I don't go down on women because of the increased chances of getting oral cancer."? Basically, is a woman at the same risk of oral cancer if she gives men oral sex compared to a man giving a woman oral sex?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That pic is an intentionally misleading scare tactic to encourage HPV vaxx for men. They used to admit it was about cervical cancer and they wanted men to get it so they arent vectors, but too many men brushed it off since it mostly didnt affect them personally. Women are less susceptible orally because pussy to mouth to mouth decreases odds of transmission from directly pussy to mouth.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Too many men brushed it off since it mostly didn't affect them personally
            So you're saying that biologically speaking, men aren't actually repulsed by STDs that won't affect them. Just like a straight man can't get HIV from a gay dude

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yes and it should go without saying that a homophobic straight man cant get hiv from gays since he wont go near them.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            A non homophobic straight man won't get HIV either from any gay man unless they share needles but needles aren't natural so they can't be part of the argument

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >men run through sharp bushes getting cuts all over
            >run with infected gay man leaving blood on every bush
            >get cut open on same bushes
            >gay blood on bush gets in cuts
            Are bushes natural?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Is it a big problem for lesbians or do they mostly have it under control?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I dont know how lesbians frick but I would guess either they do have control and High Risk is just the PC term for gays, or that their bigger problem is cervical cancer hence why the stat focuses specifically on oral cancer and omits overall rates of cancer regardless of type.

            It would somewhat be like if I made a stat for incidence of cervical cancer by gender and included ftm troons as men. What would that graph look like?

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Women are into men because they want to get thrown down and fricked violently by someone stronger than them. It's not as much about wanting someone who looks pretty. Women want to be the ones who look pretty. They enjoy having that ability to make men want to pounce on them just by walking around near them or playing with their hair.
    The real question is: do any real lesbians exist? There are so few leshians in general and then out of that group of lesbians the great majority of them have had sex with men before, with a substantial number STILL having sex with men on an ongoing basis while identifying as lesbian:

    Women mostly can't help themselves and need to get dicked down.
    Lesbianism is like 95% just a porn category for men rather than a real orientation.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      How does this factor into the popularity of gay male porn and yaoi amongst women?

      The majority of people who follow cbum on Instagram and the majority of people who consume porn are straight men. Men love seeing muscular dudes and big dicks. This is the objective truth

      Good point. This is why babewiener is a thing. As a straight guy, seeing a nice juicy wiener next to an attractive woman makes it oh so much more hotter.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yaoi is basically drawing a girl and calling her a boy and then having a romantic story with that pseudo-boy girl getting fricked by a man.
        It's for women who want to get fricked and who get more excited while imagining they're boys too and part of a forbidden love affair. Basically it's women needing to get dicked down again but with extra steps.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The majority of people who follow cbum on Instagram and the majority of people who consume porn are straight men. Men love seeing muscular dudes and big dicks. This is the objective truth

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Men love seeing muscular dudes and big dicks. This is the objective truth
      Lmao no. People regularly comment this would be the perfect video if half wasnt shots of his balls slapping his ass and the other half of the dude grunting and saying cringe shit thinking it sexy

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Only homosexual men are capable of appreciating male beauty (which all philosophers and artists have agreed is superior to female beauty). Havelock Ellis wrote that women do not like male beauty, they like male power.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Is that why gold diggers are fricking the pool boy while hubby is off at work? Young poor pool boys are renowned for how much power they hold in society.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Chuds ALWAYS believe there must be a biological explanation for their moronation. Why are men disgusted by women with hairy armpits and legs if nature didn't intend for shaving cream and razors to exist?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Why are women disgusted by men with bushy beards if nature didn't intend for shaving cream and razors to exist?
      Hair carries disease vectors. As the more mobile sex originally, men need to decrease friction with hair in crevices and have the most protection from thorns they can get while chasing down prey. Woman dont need that and only pass disease. Only positives from woman shaving. Losing out on a mammoth because you are bleeding from road rash is much more likely to kill the whole tribe than your average disease.

      Since when did feminists join fundamentalist Christians in denying evolution?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        ?si=iKJoRNN4oV21rOVI

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Good counterpoint. Sure got me with that nuh-uh

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I thought about this and it gave me gender dysphoria.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    female-female "sex" is mutual masturbation, lesbians are simply manhaters
    hot girl btw

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *