do you think given enough time that women will (re)invent society by accident? >boysober

do you think given enough time that women will (re)invent society by accident?

>boysober

>maybe we shouldt ride the wiener carousel

>because men are rapists or some shit

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    fml forgot link

    https://www.nytimes.com/2024/02/03/style/boysober-celibacy-hope-woodward.html

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Dafuq did I just read?

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >buy shirt that has peepholes to see your body
    >buy second shirt that just covers the exposed parts
    >blame men

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What do you mean Anon? It's sad but necessary.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      lmfoa
      simple and very true post

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Market clothes with holes in them to women
      >Write articles, post videos, and tweet about women being attacked for wearing revealing clothes
      >Market 'safety layer' clothing to women to make them buy more clothes to cover up the clothes with holes
      >Profit
      These marketing gays are genius.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    certainly yes. but it'll take too long to get there

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      by the time they do whichever society is ailing would have been conquered. see Sweden for instance

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >be me
    >put on a vest and underwear
    >put on trousers and a shirt
    >"that's your safety layer to stop women from lusting after your dick"
    >o-o-ok then...

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    “Creepy men” are the fuel that gets us there. Being an incel will be unironically cool in ten years.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >women have discovered shirts

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    creepy men = men confident enough to approach women.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      not really. creepy = not a chad

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      not really. creepy = not a chad

      It also means anyone that will observe the spectacle/show they put on instead of acting like a cuckold and staring at your feet.
      Clothing line that is consent in and of itself, you can do whatever you want, "rape" is not possible in this situation because she already gave consent

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The only thing Islam gets right is putting roasties in burkas.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >be me
    >8/10 qt roastie
    >wear clothes that expose my breasts and show my cameltoe and fat ass
    >guys stare
    >"OMG why are men so creepy staring at my exposed body!!!?"
    >These are the women that call you an incel
    >tfw

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    That shirt looks moronic.
    It looks 11.3 times shittier than just a regular tank top.
    This dumb b***h doesn’t realize most men are storing because she looks like a fricking idiot.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >women are wearing clothes again
    >"sad but necessary"
    Who are these people? Where do you find someone this dumb?

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They are discovering the idea of underwear. Give them a few more years and they will have it down!

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the only one creepy are women who wear what's essentially torn rags just so they can shove their breasts right into your face.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Hoes dignifai-ing themselves!

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    they only take their safety layer off for chad.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >women turn outerwear into underwear
    >start wearing regular outerwear over the outerwear-turned-underwear
    In enough time the safety layer will also be turned into underwear, necessitating an additional layer of regular outerwear. Nothing will be learned.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Generation d kids are gonna get so excited when females start undressing like a fricking onion as if it's the Victorian era all over again

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    In the same way 100 monkeys at typewriters will eventually make Shakespeare. One of my sisters friend when Roe v Wade ended suggested that she should pick 1 guy and only sleep with him just in case pregnancy happens. Took 3 people explaining to her very slowly for 30 minutes that she just suggested a committed relationship or marriage.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Took 3 people explaining to her very slowly for 30 minutes that she just suggested a committed relationship or marriage.
      based explainers.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >100 monkeys at typewriters will eventually make Shakespeare
      This has been proven false

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        it requires stipulations like the monkeys being immortal, the supplies (ink, paper, typewriter parts) being inexhaustible, the monkeys never deciding to bang with intentionality rather than randomness; but, really, this is a pedantic enumeration because it's not about monkeys writing Shakespeare, it's a statistics thought experiment about the mechanics of infinite iteration

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Even with infinite iteration, it's still false. You need a selective force guiding the monkeys and a plan for how it will eventually turn out. So natural selection plus artificial selection. Mutation isn't random, certain qualities are selected for.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            we clearly don't agree on the definitions of true random or infinity if you disagree with the basic mathematics of the thought experiment.
            infinity is infinity.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >safety layer
    That's called "outerwear." It's typical to wear it over your underwear. Underwear is not appropriate in public.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If she didn't dress like a stripper then she wouldn't need a safety layer

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      but if she doesn't wear her prostitute uniform, how are we supposed to know that she's a prostitute?

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >safety layer
    You mean a fricking cardigan? God forbid

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Clown world just keeps on giving.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why do women purposely wear provocative clothing in public and then complain that men look at them? Are women dumb? Are women moronic? Are women playing head games? Are women just children mentally?

    Is it all the above?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      They want men to look at them and feel lust, just not you.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Frick it must suck being a woman.
    They're just so dumb.

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    How did anything get so stupid? "Muh body is just a body and so not inherently sexual so it's my right to air it out as I please but the moment anyone looks in my direction it's absolutely the most sexual of sex so I'm being exploited."

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >by accident
    Traditional society wasn't an accident. morons believe women were only monogamous because of muh patriarchie n shieet forced them to be. But, really it was because women prefer it so long as their man is one they respect and admire.
    In the past, most men were high achievers by today's standards. Any man could reasonably expect to afford a home and earn a decent living. Women were happy to stay at home and care about nothing else. The last thing a woman wants is to be out in the world alone where incels and other low quality gene men try to have sex with them all the time. However, that's what they have now.

    What does it say of modern men that women would rather fly across the earth to have sex with some guy rather than someone in her home town? Clearly, the problem is in today's men. Women don't feel most men are worthy of lifetime commitment, they only admire or respect a very small % of men who achieved something in their lives. So they stay single and look further and further, and still comie up short. Clearly the pickings for women have become extremely slim.

    Until men fix their disheveled state, monogamy will not return.

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Recognizing the female shapes is literally hardwired into our brains biologically.

    To completely abstain from taking a peek is a task for only for the abnormal minded and meditating hermits of legend.
    Asking half the population to partake in ideologically overcoming their nature is completely absurd.

    It's like demanding cats simply overcome their fear of water or thinking Australians can choose to stop shitposting

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *