Feminist tries to prove women are smarter than men, instead proves she doesnt know how a bell curve works

Feminist tries to prove women are smarter than men, instead proves she doesn’t know how a bell curve works

https://twitter.com/realDailyWire/status/1760027860369109061

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    She can't even think in 2 dimensions.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      kek true,now let's see the mirror test

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Asking people to explain how the stupid ChinkTok mirror trick works and gauging the level of bewilderment in their reaction when they see it for the first time is the ultimate litmus test to see how moronic someone is.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Someone give me the down low on what clown world is giving us with mirrors now?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's basic line of sight. I'm going back to bed now. Too tired.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Thanks, yeah googled it. Damn normies are cancer, sleep well anon.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            This is what they (the mirror fiends) want you to think.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Oh my word just gave myself a free google search and realised these "winners" are obsessing over reflections. Are they going to start celebrating wiping their bumhole next?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous
          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            at last i truly see

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >demon world/israel
            my fricking sides

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Since a wave function collapse happens when it is observed, the photons from the demon realm are bouncing off of the bottom of the object that you hold up, creating another object once it is observed by the demon eye. The double objects normally annihilate each other since two objects from the main universe and the demon universe cannot ever touch, otherwise it results in a multiversal paradox. Natural electrical infetterence held within the interior of the mirror prevents them from ever touching at the sub-quantum level, hence the two objects appearing to hold each other up.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      you do realize that 90%+ of new zealanders are vaccinated, right? keep that in mind when reading the chart

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        They didn't kill their politicians so they deserve it.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        A real shame
        Those numbers could be way higher

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The sample size is 100 million people.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        you do realize you're lending credence to hateful antivaxx conspiracy theories, right?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          if you're serious, you're due for your 7th booster.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You do realize that blood clots are more dangerous if you are physically active, right?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      lmfao just look at that 5 doses chart, they died promptly after taking it

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        4th dose was some real shit too

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      why was taking a single dose so bad?
      did they add in some corrections into dose 2?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I think that taking the first dose killed a lot of people, so they didn't get a chance to take the second one

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >why was taking a single dose so bad?
        Only the cargocultists who so passionately run the world into the ground could answer that question, and that only if they weren't inbred, inept, histrionic nepotists overdosing on their own propaganda.
        What's for certain is that without the first few lockdowns after the rollout of this mystery goo, there would have been many, many more freak accidents involving the 'suddenly and unexpectedly dying' and a myriad of force multipliers such as vehicles of any kind.
        >did they add in some corrections into dose 2?
        They probably realized that it's not good idea to implement a death lottery they cannot control beyond their social misengineering and swapped most of the goo with saline.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          you are assuming the people who got 1,2,3,4,5,6 doses are all uniform in their age, disease, care setting etc. but they are not. you also forget to include infection peaks during the pandemic and the latency between infection and death.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I am not sure you've replied to the person you've meant to, so I'll be as diplomatic as I can:
            >infection peaks during the pandemic
            lol, lmao even.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Maybe an anon can better explain this graph to me because it isn't much making a whole lot of sense....

        Why would the 1 dose cohort be so much higher than every other cohort? I see the range given for the time, which partly explains it... but I just do not understand this in its entirety.

        Help bros

        the first doses were prioritized for the elderly in nursing care facilities and these people are very old and have multiple grave diseases. they are very close to death regardless of any infection or vaccine. these people were the first to be vaccinated. and only 1 dose meant they died before receiving the second or they reacted so negatively to the first dose, that they didnt receive a second one.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's ok, Todd. I'm ok.

          You are not obligated to look out for me, don't stress.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          gratitude fren, feel like a woman for not deducing this immediately tho

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Maybe an anon can better explain this graph to me because it isn't much making a whole lot of sense....

      Why would the 1 dose cohort be so much higher than every other cohort? I see the range given for the time, which partly explains it... but I just do not understand this in its entirety.

      Help bros

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >3 doses
      >lowest fatality rate

      Frick yeah

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        the 3 doses guys were the average normies, the more than 3 doses people were/are mostly in risk groups (elderly, institutionalized people, people with lung and heart diseases) so had higher risk of death from the get go.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    women are 95 iq lower in average....

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    why are all their breasts spilling out of their clothes?
    do they not know how to dress?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because, they know that is all they are, a pair of breasts.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Um I'm an academic ok...i just choose to work on OnlyFans instead of using my liberal arts degree to get hired at Starbucks. Have sex.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Let me guess in her mind because the peak for women is higher she thought it means more better gooder yasqueen, right?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Precisely

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Precisely

      they literally think "higher intelligence" means "higher curves"
      women simply don't comprehend math or statistics in any way

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      that's exactly what she says. She thinks wearing those non prescription glasses makes her more intelligent

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I love how each of these b***hes has an OnlyFans yet they try to argue for feminism like they’re intellectuals lmao.

    They know deep down that their only value is their holes.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I hate women

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >gaussian std
    red curve is probably 6-sigma standard deviation.
    blue curve is probably 3-sigma standard deviation.

    how do these curves proove anything ? it only proves the variation of data points are higher in blue curve.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The mathematical illiteracy of this muppet aside: where do you draw the line between the merchantean numbers you happily regurigitate and the merchantean numbers you reject?

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    add this to the list of jokes women will never get

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >
    define intelligence outside of "whatever IQ measures"

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      And? are not the only measures
      Women and men do not differ in intelligence.
      the average is the same.
      There isn't even a study, old or new, that shows that men are more intelligent on average.
      the most we had was simply a male concentration at the extremes, and that's not average hahaha

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        IQ is specifically designed to make men and women equal
        men are obviously smarter than women in real life

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        exactly, if the given picture were to suggest that men, on average, have a higher IQ than women, then the entire blue curve would be shifted towards the right.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        have you ever interacted with women? they are so self absorbed and moronic it's baffling. TRULY baffling. the mythical 'thoughtful intelligent woman' I'd argue is even more rare than the 'intelligent thoughtful Black person', and I'm being serious. Thomas Sowell exists. his female equivalent does not.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          have an argument or discuss a news story or political happening with a chick and 9/10 times they will find a way to steer the convo about themselves.
          Women are narcissistic to the core and petty,this is why they thrive on social media. This is also why our social media directed culture is utter shit.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Women and men do not differ in intelligence.

        They sure as shit do, Jim Bob, where it matters. The fact that there is more area under the male curve at both the extremes of high and low IQ, means that there are more male tards, and more male geniuses. A lot more.

        This is why both prisons, and physics departments, are full of men.

        As a fellow southerner, I must ask you to quit saying unintelligent stuff. I deal with enough horseshit already, whenever anyone hears my accent.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >male concentration at the extremes
        So intelligent people are more likely to be male. Good to know.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    lol isn't this saying +1 sigma for men is +2 sigma for women?
    >inb4 sigma balls

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't get it, the curve is taller for woman. Like they are at the peak. Maybe per capita men have are smarter but the curves show women are smarter on average, right?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No, it shows that women have VERY little variance in their IQ, which you can expect to be 100 for any one you meet as such.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Post breasts, bawd.

        Guys, maths is wayciss for Argies.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          WTF I was told Argentina is white?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes but that's variance per capita. On average women are smarter according to the normality distribution graphics. Are you denying that on average that's how it is?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Well, based on my own experience, assuming a woman is a midwit is correct.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          If you weren't a midwit like a woman, you would understand.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous
          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I don't think you're a midwit. I think op just has a small penis. 😉

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Those graphs are far too symmetrical to be anything other than a gross oversimplification. However, assuming they are real, if you had the same population count for each group, and calculated the area under the curve from 75 to 125, the total amount would be the same.

          The implication is that men and women have the same average (mean) IQ. However, the female distribution is more peaked. There are more midwit women and less genius or dumb women. The opposite is true for men.

          It is the high IQ people that drive, create, innovate and manage society. There are more men with high IQs than women.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            No, you are wrong. The drawings show women are more smarter. You just have to look at the lines. Who careas about what areas yall are better at, you can't put a number or "calculate" it to be 75-125

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          IIRC it means ~85% of women are smarter than ~35% of men.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Certainly makes women good worker npcs for shit that requires average intelligence. It's hilarious that they think they can compete against men in any fields that require higher intelligence like STEM. Them trying to force women into that shit ignoring the reality is why there's a competency crisis brewing.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          > variance per capita
          You wot?
          Do you know what per capita means bro?
          If per capita were applied to this dataset it would actually hurt women more because they are slightly over 50% of the total population

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          say you have 50 men and 50 women. the top ten smartest,overall, would be men, and the top 10 dumbest would be men. But the average for both groups is about the same. The smarter men even the average out

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah but the smartest are still smart, but the lowest aren’t, so more smart women, women are smarter.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            No, more midwit women. The smartest are the men and on average they are about the same.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            thats assuming that the iq test is still valid and interval scaled at extreme scores.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          bro you are moronic. IQ is on the x-axis. the height of the graph shows the probability density. i.e., frequency in the sample.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >normality distribution graphics

          You are completely neglecting the impact of freem nobulation on the totality of the imposed topology of n-space. Are you a woman or something?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I don't get it, the curve is taller for woman. Like they are at the peak. Maybe per capita men have are smarter but the curves show women are smarter on average, right?

          this is above average IQ bait. well done nazi

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Post breasts, bawd.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Means women are more likely to be NPCs.
      IQs is determined by averages and a baseline IQ is always being determined for each generation.
      See reverse flynn theory.
      Women effectively are just smart enough to realize they are human, but aren't smart enough to realize anything else.

      While men can either be the stupidest fricking thing alive or literal 4 dimensional IQ Gods compared to women.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Women have enough intelligence to not accidentally kill their kids.
        >Not enough intelligence to avoid being brainwashed into intentionally killing their kids
        What did God mean by this?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          He meant:
          >Shepard these dumb frickin creatures for my sake.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Unironic it is the job of men to lead and protect women even from themselves.
          Sorry you were given a shit hand dude.
          All of us were given the shit hand because we are men.
          Being a man is to suffer.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Being a man is to suffer.
            Your mama teach you that?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          He meant:
          >Shepard these dumb frickin creatures for my sake.

          > Stay in the kitchen you dumb b***h

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      women are midwits, they occupy a smaller range of IQ

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Both curves peak at the same place so their average is the same (100 IQ).
      Most women are average, so their curve is higher at that point.
      Men have more outliers. There are more dumbass morons and also more genius men, but according to this chart they balance each other out so the average male IQ is still 100.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Notice how it didnt adjust for race

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Because the black women are at the bottom range for women as well as men. We know black people are stupid Anon that's just not what we're talking about.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is why you're not allowed to have the Falklands....

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I mean, you make a good point.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      /misc/ users will tell you they're high IQ and then they'll fall for bait like this.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It’s shows that there are almost no smart women but men also make up all of the morons and smart people at the same time.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Fricking moronic Black. Fricking kys

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The graph says that women are far more likely to be midwits than men. There are more men on both sides of the spectrum - that is to say, men are more likely to be either completely moronic or extremely smart. Women are more likely to be on the average.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      the peak, which is the average for both groups, in this chart means that most women are average intelligence with asmaller deviation on more intelligence and being moronic. The men show are larger deviation at both of those ends, but the average is on par with women.
      essentially, men are the dumbest and smartest.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This man is spouting memes and he still gets serious responses. /misc/ dumb.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      here's your (you), sir

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What's with this recent trend of podcasts where some of those alpha gays have moronic onlyfans prostitutes on the show?

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >green light spills over 120
      I knew some blacks were human.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Those are the poor bastards that have to keep their tribes alive. It must be complete hell.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Thomas Sowell is the only one I've seen that has anything resembling a public platform.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This is fake

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why do you think it's fake? The curves are different heights because the sample population sizes are different. The OP's graph curves are probability distributions. This image's graph curves are frequency distributions.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Bottom of the barrel Whites are as smart as the average black. Absolutely brutal.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do a project that requires drainage for a 20x10 ft area of land. In the project, you are not allowed to raise the land to keep the 20x10 ft area dry.

    I guarantee that you will see the difference in spatial awareness between women and men.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Or draw a bottle upright, then tilted, and ask them to draw the water level for each.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Notice how men are simultaneously both moronic and genius but the women are midwits? This is why its easier to control women and feminine persons.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Correct. This is the answer to the "why is Europe full of atheists" question - the atheist propoaganda was directed at midwit NPC with a little bit of education aka Europeans - it only works on them or it works best on them.

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    but what if you get a bad king?

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    women are just more average

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    damn, so every time i talk to a midwit poster on /misc/ it's likely that i'm talking to a woman?

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    these homosexual ass panel shows are pro wrestling for zoomers, it's all fake and they're all friends, look at the thumbnails of these shows and all their socials/onlyfans are listed in the description. if you fall for this grift you should have a nice day immediately.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >socials
      If this is the bait for getting zoomettes on the show (free publicity) it makes sense that they wouldn't need to have anything other than financial motives to appear..
      You just know the lads laughing at these women are also fapping over them.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        even worse are the people in chat throwing money at them via superchats, as if simping for these "based redpill" guys is any better than orbiting e-prostitutes

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >it's all fake and they're all friends
      It's worse than that. They are all banging each other.

      Those graphs are far too symmetrical to be anything other than a gross oversimplification. However, assuming they are real, if you had the same population count for each group, and calculated the area under the curve from 75 to 125, the total amount would be the same.

      The implication is that men and women have the same average (mean) IQ. However, the female distribution is more peaked. There are more midwit women and less genius or dumb women. The opposite is true for men.

      It is the high IQ people that drive, create, innovate and manage society. There are more men with high IQs than women.

      Seems like you don't understand statistics, math or graphs. I assume you must be a woman.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      All of these panel shows are in LA or some shithole like that. If you find one of these women, and she's opiniated to go on one of these shows, she's probably a belligerent moron. This goes double if you get a group of them and they're all feeding off the most outspoken of the bunch.
      It's not a conspiracy, you just fell for some shitlib doing damage control.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It’s not a “grift” it’s smart business. Anyone who thinks having a successful onlyfans is easy should try and run one for a month and watch how bad they are.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I don't recall anyone saying grifting was easy.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Well that’s definitely the implication. And even outside of that there’s literally zero problem with someone whose job is entertainment and making connection providing entertainment and connecting with an audience.

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    anyone else notice how these race realist datagays on twitter turn into full morons when it comes to israelites? I saw a post from one asking antisemites to explain good israelites like a femoid asking for an explanation of smart nogs.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      What?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Here, I found it. This is the same as responding to a post criticizing blacks by saying
        >look at all the great things africans have done
        just throw out any understanding of averages that they themselves repeat ad nauseum about blacks.

        are you really seething because the data shows asian and israelites are smarter than average?

        no, that is obvious

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >we can start the israeli list with christianity
          kek!

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Jews are so fricking deceitful and disgusting.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It always amazes me how many of the intelligentsia are blissfully unaware of the endless crimes of the israelite, particularly in the 19th - 21st century. They are the greatest mass murderers in human history by a wide margin, no one even comes close to 2nd, AND THAT'S ASSUMING THE HOLOHOAX IS REAL.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Christianity was brought to the world by Greeks

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      are you really seething because the data shows asian and israelites are smarter than average?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Race realist always pull the sources of data for claims of israelite IQ
      TLDR:
      >The israelites sample for these studies come from a very small handfull of Murrika born white israelites enroled in private schools
      >That tinny sample that wouldn't get a passing grade for any sort of scientific study is then compared to the totality of the oposotion
      >A few hundred rigorously educated elite children will always get higher average score than any sample containing massive percentage of uneducated low born children
      >Even with all the cards stacked in their favor, israelites only score high on linguistic skills, (a.k.a pilpul) while white BTFO them in math and practical skill (a.k.a the useful skill that our society relies on)

      The only proof of israelite intelligence are the claims of israelites themselves, the methods by which they produced evidence in support of such claims are questionable at best, faulty at worst
      >inb4 hurrdurr how do race realist explain why israelites own all the wealth
      corruption and nepotism, starting from the vatican over 2000 years ago

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Midwits cant read graphs.
    Men on average have more higher IQ people then women, but men also have on average more lower IQ people as well. Men contains both the smartest and dumbest of our species.
    Women contain the base line average.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Because men require competing at the extremes. They need the strongest and the smartest and there's very little use for an average male whereas a woman at an extreme is very useless and an average woman, a child bearing mother, is essentially the most high value female possible. This is also why women select and men complete in sexual selection..because outside of immediate physical appearance it's the man whose variation is larger and its value rightly questioned whereas if you had to just give someone a pass card it would be the woman as long as she's capable of getting pregnant and not dying in childbirth.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Because men require competing at the extremes
        so why do we need to compete at the lower extreme? if what you said is true than men should only have high iq. why would it be important for men to be exceptionally low iq?

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    fake but I wish it wasn't.

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    how can one see comments without signing up?

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    He's technically correct, but at the mean, there are more intelligent women than men. She just doesn't understand shit she's parroting.

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Reminds me of that phone conversation from the early 2000s where some guy was arguing with his phone provider. He signed up for a deal where anything past a certain amount would be billed at $0.0002, which is .02 cents. They charged him for $0.02, or .02 dollars. He couldn’t convince them that they overcharged him because .02 dollars is 100 times more than .02 cents. The customer service rep just saw the dollar sign, and probably in his head thought “hurr 0.02 come after dollar sign and number after decimal mean cent so .02 dollars is fancy way of saying two cents!”

    It’s really hard to convince morons when they have a visual aid that you can’t change and they try to incorporate it into their argument.

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    IQ ignores life's realities. For example the idea that killing your enemies is evolutionarily advantageous is the most important notion anybody can make. Even most white men don't seem to understand this. They start crying about civilization and crime - both manmade concepts, like cucks when somebody tells blacks are killing whites every day and replacing you. If you switch your perspective from all these unnatural notions to life's realities like evolutionary genetic success (where breeding and killing becomes a priority), then suddenly you'll find that blacks are actually one of the most intelligent races out there, women are completely moronic, and white men for the most part cope because you are losing evolutionarily.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >IQ ignore's life's realities
      This is why Black folk partake in recreational camping, hunting, fishing and farming more than white men.. Sure thing lad.
      Nothing to do with the opportunistic nature of lower IQs.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Blacks are able to put themselves in a position where their numbers skyrocket and they are able to mass migrate everywhere else but nobody is coming to replace the blacks from where they originate. This is biologically extremely successful and intelligent. If other animals and plants did this biologists would look at it with admiration. Only coping losers deny this reality.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You are equating success with intelligence.
      There are geniuses that didn't breed at all, like Tesla, and instead fricked pigeons or some other degeneracy. But we all benefited from things they discovered or invented.
      Absolute morons can breed out of control until they tip something in the environment and a bunch of them die out. It doesn't make them intelligent, just better adapted to take advantage of available resources in the short term.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >fricked pigeons
        >degeneracy
        Pick one

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous
      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Every other form of intelligence is a manmade construct that only plays in people's heads but never exists outside of it.

        As the saying goes: actions speak louder than words. Nobody cares what mental gymnastics you play in your delusional head if none of it translate to real life success.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You have some bizarre notion that intelligence is good and therefor anything good that happens to anyone is because they are intelligent.
          It doesn't work that way. People succeed or fail based on many factors, including simple dumb luck.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I think being able to do something but not wanting to is different than being unable to do something, but in the long run it makes no difference and you're right

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Even after 3000 fricking years, israelites STILL don't understand morality
      Hopefully, one of the new migrants you imported to terrorrize native finns will culturally enrich you by showing you his evolutionarily superior intelligence.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Natalism is overrated Ahkmed.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Interesting take, but all you're pointing out, really, is a temporary glitch in an artifical system. Blacks are exploited an artificial wonderland. They're doing better in Disneyland. Once Disnelyand collapses, things are going to get tougher. The only question is whether there will be enough people left to rebuild a Disneyland.

      Pariah dogs flourish in cityscapes living on human waste, but once things revert to nature, its wolves and coyotes that take it back.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Black person being to stupid, violent, and low-trust to form cohesive societies doesn't make them smart, Finngoloid

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Can some chud make this a webm? This is humour thread fuel.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I can do it but im not sure i feeeaal like it.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Like this?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >He doesnt say it in a way his audience would understand, i.e. "On this picture intelligence goes side to side, number of people goes up and down"
        >Actually uses the word "X Axis", which being smart he should know no one he's talking to is going to understand
        Why are smart people so dumb?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Everyone learns about axis on like grade three
          His audience is surely older than that

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >They should know
            A smart person doesn't live in the land of should. He's had plenty of time to observe and ascertain how moronic the people around him are.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Actually uses the word "X Axis", which being smart he should know no one he's talking to is going to understand
          Even in the US that's taught by the age of 12.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Even in the US that's taught by the age of 12.
            see

            >They should know
            A smart person doesn't live in the land of should. He's had plenty of time to observe and ascertain how moronic the people around him are.

            As a smart person he had more than enough opportunity to figure out how dumb the people around him were.

            The average 12 year old white boy is much, much smarter than the average grown prostitute.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The guy appears to be in pain.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >40 seconds
        >mentions Larry Summers
        Kek, that's the Harvard President I was talking about here

        in 2006 the President of Harvard mentioned this as a possible reason for why there are more male professors in STEM positions at Ivy League schools. He was forced to resign because feminists lost their shit even though they couldn't refute anything he said.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        but how many of you noticed one of the women is a literal sex doll with a cigar shoved in its mouth?

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    percentiles are hard if you are not taught quintiles

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      pay attention.

      she does not knowvpercentiles are like quintiles

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    this is the same dumb b***h who fricked Destiny for fame.

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    She’s not wrong though. Taller means more people in the space so more women are smarter than men, until you get to like the vanishingly rare super high IQs. It’s like if all the women are basically 5’9 and all the men are basically 5’7, the fact that the tiny fraction of society that are basketball players, the men are taller than the women doesn’t change the fact that we’re smarter.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      She is wrong, you're wrong and that graph is wrong. Put 1000 men on one island and 1000 women on another and see what happens. IQ tests are designed to make women look less mentally disabled than they are. The obviousness of what I'm saying is visible wherever you look. No one wants a woman in charge of anything, women especially.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Society isn’t an island. Women are kicking mens butts in higher education and the workforce, and still doing so much of the child rearing that people are like, “oh dad’s babysitting” or “how great that dad’s giving mommy a break” when he does literally anything, because the bar for men is two inches below the ground. If women disappeared or went on strike tomorrow all our societies would instantly collapse.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Society isn't an island.
          Correct, that's why they're both dumped on an island, to see what becomes of it. Society is civilization, and women do not create civilizations, never have, and in the digital economy and equal rights, have brought about the end of it in the west, like the Greeks knew they would in assemblywomen.

          Your bait is weak if you're not not a bot. Herbs.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The builders come to build a house, but then at that point, you need people to decorate and fill it and maintain it, not more builders, you don’t need them anymore. They need to adapt to something useful or at least stop whining about how important they’d be if we were all lost in a big open plain.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Women are kicking mens butts in higher education and the workforce,
          Fake educations and fake jobs subsidized by the massive production of white men, that outstrips all other groups exponentially.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Women are kicking mens butts in higher education
          Men get the degrees that are actually useful for the world.
          The more women in the degree the dumber it is.
          Men are making ai and more efficient solar panels.
          Women are creating gender ideology.
          >the workforce
          In popularity contest jobs nobody needs.

          All the actual work (tradies, insfrastructure, engineering, advances in software and computing) is men.
          Top 10 richest men all changed the world with their innovation.
          Top 10 richest women, 8 got it from a man who did that, 1 got popular by being a famous thot and selling a makeup brand, 1 got there by destroying the great barrier reef with oil fracking.

          >still doing so much of the child rearing that people are like, “oh dad’s babysitting” or “how great that dad’s giving mommy a break” when he does literally anything, because the bar for men is two inches below the ground
          Stop fricking bums.

          >If women disappeared
          Humanity would die out because there's one contribution only women can make and everyone acknowledges that.
          >went on strike tomorrow all our societies would instantly collapse.
          What specifically?
          A couple supply lines won't have the paperwork and will be delayed a day or two?
          Some boomers in the nursing home will be short nurses?
          A full female strike is a minor inconvenience that would easily pay off if they all simply did the thing we actually DO need them for.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Right, no one needs healthcare, businesses don’t need to worry about money and staff to stay in business, no one needs tax dollars cause they do nothing, let the whole education system collapse while your teeth rot in your mouth and you die of skin cancer. And I know obviously it isn’t a problem for you to live without any companionship, but imagine not being able to pay girls to be nice to you online.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Businesses make up play pretend work for women, anything remotely useful they do could be done ten times faster by men.
            No one white needs taxes, correct.
            Let the whole education system collapse.
            White men don't struggle to maintain their teeth

            I'd rather live 40 years in a good society than 80 surrounded by prostitutes

            The people with all the Guns present... TOTAL CITY DEATH!

            Kill Cityoids. Behead cityoids. Roundhouse kick a cityoid into the concrete. Slam dunk a cityoid baby into the trashcan. Crucify filthy urbanites. Defecate in a cityoid's food. Launch cityoids into the sun. Stir fry cityoids in a wok. Toss cityoids into active volcanoes. Urinate on a cityoids bicycle. Judo throw cityoids into a wood chipper. Twist cityoid heads off. Report cityoids to the IRS. Karate chop cityoids in half. Curb stomp pregnant urban cityoids. Trap cityoids in quicksand. Crush cityoids in the trash compactor. Liquefy cityoids in a vat of acid. Eat cityoids. Dissect cityoids. Exterminate cityoids in the gas chamber. Stomp cityoid skulls with steel toed boots. Cremate cityoids in the oven. Lobotomize cityoids. Mandatory abortions for cityoids. Grind cityoid fetuses in the garbage disposal. Drown cityoids in sewers. Vaporize cityoids with a ray gun. Kick old cityoids into subways. Feed cityoids to alligators. Slice cityoids with a katana.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, you’re spend 1/10th the time and gonna nurse, clean teeth, and care and educate all the kids and accomplish none of it because those things all take time.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >educate all the kids
            Reminder that homeschooled kids do better than public school kids on every single metric from testing to future earnings in their careers.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >nuking the 20 largest cities will turn America 80% white Protestant
            Fricking hell, give me the big red button and I’ll happily nuke the cities myself without any hesitation.

            You could try to make it sound like a big, serious, and hard choice that you’re about to present me with, about how pushing the button will result in untold loss of life, irreparably scarring the landscape, whatever negative sounding spin you want to, but the instant “this button will nuke the 20 largest U.S. cities” crosses your lips, the button is getting pressed until either it fricking breaks, or my finger does.

            Afterward I will immediately put myself on camera afterward only to say “I did that shit. You’re welcome planet earth” and frick right off.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Right, no one needs healthcare
            It's not that urgent and there are plenty of male doctors.
            People should just learn to accept death after 75 instead of endless life extension.
            >businesses don’t need to worry about money and staff to stay in business
            >no one needs tax dollars cause they do nothing
            Maybe 5% of tax dollars go to something necessary. And without bullshit jobs they'll just tax the consctruction worker more for his higher wages.
            >let the whole education system collapse
            Not much would change.
            MOOCs are better than public schooling.
            Making kids sit silent and still for the 8 hours of sunlight inside to listen to some mediocre woman talk at them is crueler than child labor.
            >your teeth rot in your mouth
            Teeth doing well except 2 I had work on a decade ago.
            Wanted to remove 4 other teeth which apparently are all healthy now after a decade.
            American healthcare is a massive scam.
            >you die of skin cancer
            People have always died of diseases healthcare or not.
            >And I know obviously it isn’t a problem for you to live without any companionship, but imagine not being able to pay girls to be nice to you online
            Only a true moron would pay an onlyfans thot when an ai chatbot does it better for free.

            But yes a decent women can be a good companion sometimes.
            Doesn't mean they should be allowed to have power.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            None of these jobs would cause society to instantly collapse if they disappear kek. Try having a society when all the farmers disappear overnight.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No, because the graph is a probability distribution. If we were talking about a frequency distribution, that would be correct.

      The graph demonstrates that if you sample a population of females and give them IQ tests, the y-axis represents the probability that a random female selected from that population obtains that IQ score. Likewise for the graph of males.

      If the IQ data points are authentic, they should ideally form a normal distribution.

      It's unlikely that the curves would peak at the exact same IQ value. The image in question might be more of a meme rather than an accurate representation.

      [...]
      really, what biological data ?

      Most likely the female IQ is centered at 100 because they're not intercomparing the sample populations between each other. If the females are considered a separate sample, than their mean score will by definition be 100. When you intercompare, the female mean is trivially lower than the male mean, about 3 points. The average male does score slightly higher.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Well that all changed depending on what you call “smart.” If people with at least an 85 IQ are smart it’s pretty much all women are there and a lot of men below, so if you want a group of 100 smart people your best bet is all women.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Midwit =/= smart so no.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          What's smart depends on an individual's perspective, yes. A 30 IQ point difference is comparable to talking to a child. That means for someone with a 3-sigma IQ score, virtually all women are like children. Of course, you can have meaningful interactions with a kid, or even a pet, so, practically speaking, what's good enough depends on what needs doing. If I have no other way to screen and I need to be absolutely sure nobody is truly clinically moronic, 100 women is a safer bet.

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't give a frick about any of this, where are the nudes of the tit cow on the left?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      The coomer asking the important questions.

  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The higher your IQ the dumber you are. The fewer children you have, the less likely you are to kill your enemies. You are more likely to be altruistic and into egalitarianism etc.. So high IQ is something you don't want if you want to be intelligent. Low IQ on the other hand ensures that you don't think twice about smashing your enemies skull if he enters your territory. You also don't give a flying frick about things like women's rights which only high IQ people care about. You'll just breed them and populate the planet with your genetic offspring that take it over and make you the king of evolution. White people need to somehow lower their IQ if they want to be more intelligent and successful.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It just depends on the environment. Intelligent people can kill. They can do it very well. They can split the fricking atom and do it on an industrial scale that morons can only dream of.
      Being altruistic and being intelligent are two different things.
      You want to blame IQ for all these problems, but it's nonsense.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Intelligent people can kill.
        On average less. Blacks may have lower IQ on average, but they also kill more whites on average. Which one of these traits would a biological organism want? Well, of course the capacity to kill. IQ is manmade nonsense that disappears once the last of you fools who believe in that concept disappears.

        You have some bizarre notion that intelligence is good and therefor anything good that happens to anyone is because they are intelligent.
        It doesn't work that way. People succeed or fail based on many factors, including simple dumb luck.

        Well, itnelligence is the organ responsible for behavior. Most intelligent behavior is the kind that leads to success. Mother nature doesn't care if you can flip around numbers and come to a equation and solve the rubik's cube in 7 seconds lmao. Completely irrelevant manmade "achievements." Wtf does it matter if you can't even breed or kill the enemies that come to take over your nation?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >social construct
          Just like math.. Tools do generally lose their usefulness when there is no-one capable enough to use them.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >on average less
          A couple world wars and attempts at communism demonstrate otherwise.
          >they also kill more whites on average
          They hardly kill anyone. Whites spent millennia killing each other in droves. They are exceptionally good at it.
          >which one of these traits would a biological organism want
          The one that leads them to alter their environment to the point where it is essentially a paradise that those blacks are constantly trying to move to despite insane risks in some cases.
          >iq is manmade nonsense that disappears once the last of you fools who believe in that concept disappears
          Every concept you are aware of is "manmade nonsense" you midwit.
          itnelligence is the organ responsible for behavior
          "itnelligence" isn't an organ.
          >most intelligent behavior is the kind that leads to success
          You've spent half this thread arguing otherwise. That intelligence can lead to altruistic behaviour that others can take advantage of for example. But now you're back on this fix that any successful move must have been an intelligent move, despite the fact that people routinely make risky gambles that appear insane or moronic when you know the odds, but they still win.
          >wtf does it matter if you can't even breed or kill the enemies that come to take over your nation
          Long term, midwit. Organizing ourselves so that we get off this planet will be worth any cost, including a few people getting murdered by Black folk every year, if it means some of us survive a strike from a massive meteor for example. Think on a bigger scale, dummy.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >They hardly kill anyone.
            Blacks are evolutionarily mogging whites every day. Almost every mulatto also has a black father.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Every violent crime is not a murder. Try harder.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Black folk kill half a million whites every year ?
            That is grounds for an UN voted extermination of their race, and they think they deserve reparations when the rest of the world deserves reparations for simply tolerating them

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Every concept you are aware of is "manmade nonsense" you midwit.
            That's right. We don't need to be aware of anything to be successful. We just need to follow our instincts. Blacks follow their instincts. Even Muslims follow their tribalistic instincts without thinking about it. And they are all far more successful than whites. For some reason you got it stuck in your head that we need to ponder things all the time, wander in our minds into the past or the future, when we can just be present all the time. No need for manmade ideas. We are animals afterall. The less animal you are the more stupid ideas you get in your head that just hinder your biological needs, as white people perfectly demonstrate. As this forum demonstrates, by typing and tapping on keyboards all the time instead of going out and living. /misc/ is nothing but ideas ideas endless ideas which don't mean anything in the end. I'm one of the few who actually speaks it like it is, and not merely present more worthless ideas.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >let's just be animals and not think about anything
            Okay. Go live in the woods eating your own shit then. I won't miss you.
            White people have build environments that literally everyone else is envious of and wants to come and take part in. And there are more white people alive today than at any previous moment in history. You are so completely ignorant it is laughable.
            The fact that you somehow think you are above all this, despite participating in it with the rest of in exactly the same manner is just icing on the cake.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Humans are tribalistic. The whole tribe needs to work in unison or they are dysfunctional. A wolf pack wouldn't survive if all are lone wolves. Blacks find common ground in that hardly any of them are hindered by thinking. This may seem like chaotic to you with your unnatural thinking-focused living but to mother nature it's not chaotic at all: the results speak for itself. Blacks, Indians, Muslims and other low inhibition races are quickly taking over, like any other invasive species in history. What makes this case particularly annoying is that you possess language and are able to employ specious arguments to justify your actions (inaction rather), so it gets very tiresome to watch you die while you cry with mental gymnastics. No matter, no amount of thinking will change your situation. We are going to have go at this the old way. You either get up and do it or you lie down and die. No way around it cuck whitey.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Humans are tribalistic
            You can't say that in the EU remember diversity of other tribes taking over ur country is a strength.
            To think you dumbasses were dumb enough to fall for this israelite shit!

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >[typing and tapping on keyboard intensifies]
            You don't have a single argument, midwit. You think because low IQ mongs can survive in pretty much any environment like wiener roaches this means that they are intelligent.
            You don't even know what the word intelligent means and yet you drone on and on about some doomer bullshit with the occasional buzz word or pop psychology term thrown in for flavour.
            There are more whites alive today than at any point in history. You never countered this point. You just ignored it.
            If there are rats running around in the gutter in the street outside picking at your leavings does that mean you are less successful? Hardly.
            If white people were actually under some existential threat they would start killing people, up to and including nuking their dumb asses. Again.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      History proved otherwise. Low IQ tactics were tried before and they failed every time.Also, you cannot conquer the galaxy having a Low IQ ,you would never even leave the solar system.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Do you know how to build a car or motorcycle? No, but you might be able to drive one. Some of the dumbest people in the world can make a giant steel box move at deadly speeds like it’s totally trivial. I can see a point where space travel might be the same. Of course, it seems absolutely insane that we could think of a total moron cruising around in the absolute death trap that is space, but I’m sure that people pre-automobile certainly thought that it would be way easier to have some kind of personal transportation that was faster than a horse, but you would have to be a total idiot to give that to just about everyone because of how dangerous it seemed. The human race has always been a collection of total idiots being carried by the ingenious inventions and systems of a very small minority of geniuses.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          That small minority of geniuses is what moved our civilization one step forward every decade or so. My point is that regardless of how automatized the system ends up being,it needs intelligent people to "ignite the engine". We need geniuses to help us pass this kosher exam, like your founding fathers creating amendments.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >just lower your IQ
      Won't have to. IQ allows for complex systems to be created, operated and maintained. Currently the crises of competencies are formenting a degradation to what you claim you desire. What you are asking for now is essentially a system in which you believe you will thrive, but lack the capacity to understand the implications, nor how you are less likely to actually succeed.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You don't need systems to win. You just need testosterone, aggression, combativeness and a working penis. The fact that whites completely squandered their opportunity to wipe out blacks with the supposed technological advantage just proves that technology isn't all that it's cracked up to be. If that technology had been in the hands of the natives instead they would not have hesitated to wipe out whites. Like the Maori who instantly exterminated the Moriori when they got their hands on European guns.

        Systems don't mean anything if you lack the capacity to kill. They just make you autistic dysfunctional weirdos who short circuit when they come in contact with a specie that isn't concerned with same manmade ideas, like blacks for example. Now blacks are running around in Europe having a blast destroying everything while the cuck whitey is dumbfounded with his high IQ.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's true, but those systems wouldn't exist without a very strict moral code in the civilization that came up with them. High technology needs high morality and technology defeats itself.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Go get em tiger.. We will all be dealing with the consequences in future. Don't worry yourself none.

          The difference in hanging our criminals was how we got here by the way.

          >Maori
          Who just so happen to live under white rule, who they did not eradicate. Wonder why?

          >combativeness and a working penis
          "Muh Dick". Ok Black person.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Thanks Rabbi do you have any leaded gasoline for me to drink and Black folks to inseminate my (male) womb?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      You can become aware of the realities of life at an IQ greater than say 125 without falling for israeli tricks or indoctrination. Wisdom doesn't require age, just healthy skepticism.

  34. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    b***h on the left is the only one with decent nudes, other two are fricking horrible
    there shoukd be a user rating system for.onlyfans where they get tiered

  35. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why do they always have their breasts out? Stop objectifying me, eyes up here, take me serious, male gaze, etc. But then fricking top pulled down to her areolas.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why do men grab their privates in public? You need to set your priorities straight.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Stop spending time with morons and you will see a lot less crotch grabbing, dumbass.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Is that something that happens in whatever south Asian shithole you're too ashamed to show you're in? Here in civilized countries, that isn't something that happens too often.

  36. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I remember sating I was in the middle when I was little because I thought I was fairly average. My parents thought I was dumb for that because even through all the abuse I suppose they thought highly of me or they thought I should think more highly of myself.
    It turned out I was much, much higher on the chart than any of us imagined.
    -
    Still, regardless of the results derived from that test, "I.Q." does not define intelligence, and the majority of my time spent in school was wasted.
    I would have rather had a mentor than have been part of the public schooling system. I became so dejected over the years of beatings and starvation etc. I basically dropped out of life and lived in my mind rather than trying to do anything meaningful with my reality.
    What a waste of life.

  37. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    t. Trans woman

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      t. AGP rapehon

  38. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    both are centered at 100 (by definition), but women have a lower sd
    this means that women are more intelligent on average
    the feminist was right

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Women are pretty smart.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Mind you the people that hold these studies are gatekeeped by prostitutes who have a bias towards outside races. Totally gonna trust that shit because some fat single white b***h said so cuse she has a bastard by Tyrone.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >both are centered at 100 (by definition)
      yeah but how do they make it a perfect normal distribution? i highly doubt that the test score results are perfectly bell curve shaped around the median.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        someone didn't study the central limit theorem, kek

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          as far as i know biological data do not follow a normal distribution. thats why i am surprised that iq somehow does.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        If the IQ data points are authentic, they should ideally form a normal distribution.

        It's unlikely that the curves would peak at the exact same IQ value. The image in question might be more of a meme rather than an accurate representation.

        as far as i know biological data do not follow a normal distribution. thats why i am surprised that iq somehow does.

        really, what biological data ?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          as far as i know biological data do not follow a normal distribution. thats why i am surprised that iq somehow does.

          IQ is presumed to be normal, and the data is normalized to fit that distribution. With that said, most biological traits are normally distributed, so the presumption isn't unfounded.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >really, what biological data ?
          blood hemoglobin, blood cell counts, plasma glucose, alkaline phospatase levels in the blood, body weight, number of legs in an animal...

          none of these are normally distributed.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Was the context of the conversation about the average? No? Maybe you should shut the frick up then because you sound like the average woman.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >so why would god equip the average woman to be smarter than men?
        >not about average

        as far as i know biological data do not follow a normal distribution. thats why i am surprised that iq somehow does.

        with enough random samples, the sample mean distribution will always be approximately normal even if the underlying distribution isn't
        did you not study probability theory?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >did you not study probability theory?
          what if your distribution has multiple peaks or is skewed? wouldnt then taking the median of multiple samples be basically cheating as in, yeah it gives you a normal distribution but the graph no longer represents reality.

          men die more than women in almost every age group so there are more women in the world than men and the women are older. iq decreases with age, which would mean women should have a lower iq simply because there are more old women than old men. if this is not the case it would mean that women are smarter than men because they have the same median iq even though they are older in general.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            collect say 100 samples of your pic, take the sample mean of each of those then plot their frequencies and it will look more like a bell curve

            CLT is all about the mean

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >take the sample mean of each of those then plot their frequencies and it will look more like a bell curve
            >CLT is all about the mean
            but then the curve does no longer represent the actual distribution of the data points. all the actual peaks, plateaus and the skewedness is gone if you normalize the data.

            why do this?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >with enough random samples, the sample mean distribution will always be approximately normal even if the underlying distribution isn't
          >did you not study probability theory?

          Ironically, this is completely and utterly untrue

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            under the right conditions, it absolutely is true
            take the limit of the number of random samples and you will get a normal distribution

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >take the limit of the number of random samples and you will get a normal distribution
            the random samples of sample means*, not just any collection of random samples

  39. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >feminist
    stopped reading there

  40. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Problem glasses
    >Middle b***h just looking like a pile of dawg shit and speaking the same
    >Ms-lookatmuhbreasts
    Cuse her nipples are riding the brim for anything other than sexual attention.
    Women have become such disgusting predictable bawds that a game of poker is more unpredictable than what these bawds are gonna do.

  41. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    these curves are deceiving anyway, because the extremes are way exaggerated for men
    also men's graph should be shifted to the right slightly

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >men's graph should be shifted to the right slightly
      why?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        IIRC they use different benchmarks to define "100". White british males for men, and possibly white british females for women. That's why they just so happen to line up perfectly.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        because men are on average smarter than women by a few IQ points

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          source?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            https://www.nature.com/articles/nature04966
            this is controversial topic though, so you have to shift through a lot of ideological bullshit, to get to the truth. The thing I'm not willing to do. But feel free to engage.

  42. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    sadly, many don't know how to read that graph. I saw several tards in the comment section saying she is right.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      She is though. If you get groups of people you’ll have more smart women.

  43. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    We are playing with fire cultivating a society where woman and blacks, the dumbest people holding us back are untouchable to criticism.

  44. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I h8 the daily israelite

  45. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The elephant in the room you have been taught to not mention. CIRCUMCISION. Trauma based mind control and learned helplessness.. That's how men are mentally controlled.

    It was CIRCUMCISION all along

  46. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Girls ... ladies ... please ... I don't want to fight you. I'm 148iq AND I could beat all three of you up at the same time. But all I really want is to hold you while you tell me about your day and how it made you feel. :3
    We shouldn't fight. It's not a competition. It's not you versus us. It's all of us together. How we value objective reality in how equal we are is pointless. The final judgment and standards are always subjective, no matter what. Rather than look at equality through the lens of materialism why not try looking at it from the perspective of valuing human life and that all of us are precious?

  47. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Women get different tests than men, that's how they get 100IQ average for both men and women, women literally get a nerfed test, if they did the same test as a male they would get a lower score

  48. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Women are stupid yet think they're smart. In other news: the sky is blue today.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Women are stupid and I don't respect them
      That's right I just have sex with them

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >lol women are so dumb they think they’re only good for sex
        >also I think women are only good for sex
        >r/iamverysmart

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          You're talkin' to me about stuff, why?
          I'd rather see your breasts

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            You know, if you work on your issues, stop blaming women for the fact that you’re a creep, maybe someday, way off in the future, some poor girl will actually say yes to you for the first time ever.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I can't have sex with your personality
            And I can't put my penis in your college degree

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            So women having options, independence, learning, seeing what’s in the world and experiencing life means no woman will ever choose you. Because that sounds like a really personal problem that you should fix.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I wanna see your bum, I don't care what you say
            No I don't have feelings 'cause feelings are gay

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            If you follow all of my responses, I was citing a song the whole time

  49. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >daily wire

  50. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Despite no differences in general intelligence, there are sex differences in specific abilities
    THAT'S A DIFFERENCE YOU MONGOLOID

  51. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Seems like a lot of bait in this thread.

    Ironically the midwit meme could be made even for the graph about variance in IQ for the sexes. Its like a meme of a meme. Meme Inception

    A rough template for men on both the left side and the right as Drooling moron and Certified Genius on both ends with women in the middle as Common Midwit. Something like that its a work in progress. Kek

  52. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    well that curve pretty much proves women are meant to be management, dont it?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      only if you want your managers to have an IQ below 107

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        no, I want them to be really smart but you and me both know managers are midwits

  53. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Buy an ad israelite

  54. 2 months ago
    Anonymous
  55. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    That was a very nice way to say: - YES, men have high G and we try everything we can't to hide that, now we just say there's " differences in specific abilities "

    Men have much higher spacial abilities and mecânica abilities than woman, for this reason alone the IQ is higher.

    It should be noted that this male advantage is consistently present despite efforts by test developers to construct tests on which males and females obtain the same IQs. Thus “From the very beginning test developers of the best known intelligence scales (Binet, Terman, and Wechsler) took great care to counterbalance or eliminate from their final scale any items or subtests which empirically were found to result in a higher score for one sex over the other” (Matarazzo, 1972, p. 352); and “test developers have consistently tried to avoid gender bias during the test development phase” (Kaufman & Lichtenberger, 2002, p. 98). The Wechsler tests have reduced the true male advantage by excluding measures of spatial perception and mental rotation on which males obtain higher scores than females by 9.6 and 10.9 IQ points, respectively (Voyer, Voyer & Bryden, 1995); and also by excluding tests of mechanical abilities on which 18 year old males have an advantage of .72d (10.2 IQ points) (Hedges & Newell, 1995). This has been noted by Eysenck (1995, p. 128), who adopted my estimate of a 4 IQ point male advantage: “Allowing for the fact that Wechsler made every effort to equalize IQ between the sexes… we may perhaps say that an IQ difference of four points would be a conservative estimate of the true difference.”

    https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/2021/06/hiding-sex-differences-not-a-myth/

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      which test population do we even speak about? how do you even get tested for iq to begin with? do you pin a paper at your local university looking for participants and take 20-30yo something students as your test sample or do you go to a nursing care home and test people aged 65 plus? because that makes a massive difference. in my personal experience in old age the women are noticeably smarter.

  56. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >processing speed and writing
    Well that explains how women can spend their entire lives gossiping.

  57. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    feminists were never smart

  58. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I really really hate all females. How could such a useless, stupid parasitic group of filth exist. The females are so stupid that a dog or a cat or a chimpanzee has more intelligence and merit. Human females really are the apex parasite, which provides nothing absolutely nothing more than incubation to further civilization.
    I look at the females and I'm both depressed and enraged at the same time.

  59. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    What is general intelligence?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Is a broad mental test for all types of mental abilities.

      Men vast overperform woman in visual spacial for about 10 points.

      And this butthole come and make test gender friendly and put fewer test where men overperform just to say: WE'RE ALL EQUAL.

  60. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    i personally would be interested to see the non normalized distribution of the test results. im pretty sure that IQ distribution has multiple peak plateaus and is skewed differently in the lower spectrum than in the upper spectrum.

    why do they not give us the real distribution instead of that homogenized normal distribution bullshit?

  61. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Friendly Reminder: Michael Knowles is an actual card-carrying member of the israelites and is pretending to be a gentile, just like Matt Walsh. israelites play ALL sides, not just one side that annoys you.

  62. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Lmao. That graph proves that women are literally NPCs.

  63. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    He is dumb for going there to argue with some bimbos.

  64. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    in 2006 the President of Harvard mentioned this as a possible reason for why there are more male professors in STEM positions at Ivy League schools. He was forced to resign because feminists lost their shit even though they couldn't refute anything he said.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      men are more likely to become professor because being a professor means a shitton of work and basically you need an understanding housewife to manage all your affairs at home while you can concentrate on work. this doesnt work for women because they dont want house husbands and do not marry down. the female professors i know that arent diversity hires either have no children or having children blocked their careers for years as in having a child was 3 years of not a single paper published which is not good for a scientific career. professors also dont need smarts, their most important skill is successfully begging for money.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >because being a professor means a shitton of work
        that was the other reason he mentioned. Feminists insisted that if women were less than 50% of STEM professors it could only be caused by universities discriminating against men. None of them had any evidence, yet the President was the one who had to resign.

  65. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Men are actually smarter on average as well by a few points.

  66. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I can't be mad. Women can't into knowledge, and that is what makes them cute.

  67. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Stop shilling your low iq incel podcast homosexual.

  68. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    She’s saying that women’s IQ is more gathered towards the middle, whereas men have more very intelligentsia and more very stupids. She’s saying that a greater number of the female population is average. They don’t do the extremes. The graph works fine.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That is not what she said

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      That might be what she was trying to say. We'll never really know.
      What she said was
      >why would god equip the average woman to be smarter than man
      >are you disputing that on average women are more intelligent than men
      Which sounds more like she doesn't understand the graph.

  69. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    women are dumber. their iq is vs other women and not compared to men. stem numbers and graduates show they are moronic. chess league for them bc they cant compete with men shows it. speaking to them for 2 mins shows it.

  70. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The representative women midwit.

  71. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Someone shop this to show two peaks side by side.

  72. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do you think she would pass this test?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      No

  73. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >writing
    What do they mean by writing ? Like , they are better at using a pen to draw nice letters ?
    Yet, best writers are a vast majority men

  74. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    this study has been done several times and what they do is test boys and girls at 13, where girls typically mature faster than boys, it's incredibly dishonest.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      men's brains are 15% larger than women on average, to make them the same size you would have to remove the equivalent of a golf ball from your brain.

  75. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >screenshot of a twitter post of a screenshot of a science article
    Lol.
    Also posting one science article does not definitely prove or disprove anything. Especially that single article. It only has 3 authors.
    If science journals worked like that, it would be more emotional and bipolar than a 13 year old girl on meds.
    Sample sizes, making sure it's not bad data, multiple studies, evidence in the article themselves, etc. all contribute.
    But all you really need to look at is the entire history of mankind- even the last few decades during rampant feminism. Vast majority of pioneers are men. Even some of the female rulers admit this and talk about how women need to be kept in line by men.
    It's clear that women are inferior when it comes to intelligence.

    tl;dr Kys.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      yet you were born out of her with her genes in you. clown

  76. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that this curve with equal peaks is taken from 12 year olds, giving women the biggest possible advantage. Adult women are between 0.5 and 1 SD below men of the same race on average.

  77. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    hahah that's destiny's prostitute

  78. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Black person

  79. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >https://SHITTER.com/realDailyWire/status/1760027860369109061

    anon tries to shame women

    but actually tries to revive the DEAD SHITTER.COM

    hahahahahaha it's over SHITTERINOS....

  80. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I belive it. There are alot of moron ass dudes out there. And women are ALL the same, mostly.

  81. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Black person

  82. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    i thought IQ wasnt real and just a racist myth

  83. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    These are random prostitutes who get to do podcasts because they suck dick.
    They don't know what 2+2 is, let alone concepts like feminism or bell curves.

  84. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    your telling me that for any other measurement you could take - men and women would have different averages e.g. height, life expectancy etc. but it just so happens that for IQ they have exactly the same average, even with environmental factors like women doing different subjects in school to men?

    bullshit

  85. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >not so bright woman tries their hands on graphs
    >fails
    le 4chun incel chuds : reeeeeeee all woman dumb reee we are kangz and shiiittt. Low iq reeee. meanwhile they are themselves shitted out by a woman and later nurtured by her.
    4chun can be considered as the general standard to gauge intelligence from the bottom. It is a cesspool of not so bright animals.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *