I have never in my life heard of a good argument against sex with chiIdren, when both parties respect eachother's boundaries and act kind and goo...

I have never in my life heard of a good argument against sex with chiIdren, when both parties respect eachother's boundaries and act kind and good towards eachother.

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i like when people dont try to prey on those more vulnerable than they are.

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Mainly the argument is that situation pretty much never happens irl and your brain has been damaged by manga

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That situation "never happens" because it's highly illegal and all the "good people" know better than to break a law that can get them in jail for life, while all the sociopathic people don't give a frick and just rape, decieve and do whatever they can to get away with it.

      You are dumbass for falling for the biggest selection bias in history.
      I unironically can't think of a bigger selection bias anywhere else in sociology.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i think its okay as long as its wholesome
    people doing it out of fetish tendencies should be lynched

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Mandatory text so I can actually post this.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >NPC encounters an argument so foreign from his brainwashing that his only cope is that it must be bait
      kek, let me guess, vaxxed?

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    In the highest echelons of society, it's generally expected of parents to bring their children to parties in order to serve as sexual entertainment for the other adults. Of course, such people are well distanced from the puritanical doctrines of Christianity. They worship the lord of liberty, the lightbringer.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why is the idea that, even if youre in a position to exploit another person with less power than you, you shouldn't do it, so hard to figure out for some people? if i could have sex with a mentally disabled person, i probably just would not do it cause i recognize the inherent power imbalance of being able minded. that is not based on healthy relationship dynamics or mutual respect no matter how much (actual) pedos try to argue otherwise.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because that is an incredibly cucked mindset.
      You are essentially saying that some people are abuse others, therfore I shouldn't be able to engage in this behaviour in a non-abusive way.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There's this thing that humans have called empathy.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        if it wasn't abusive in the first place, there wouldn't be a power dynamic necessary. if i'm only nice to you because i have power over you, is that really "niceness"? what happens if the power dynamic changes? does the nice behavior go away? oftentimes these power dynamics require that one individual is in a constant inferior state, and hampering their development in the long run.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          hampers their development
          frick my life
          weirdly the argument reminds me a lot of women and submission. lots of women are into being submissive and inferior, and maybe its possible that a man would not necessarily abuse them in that state. but frankly, most people want to be loved even if they were not inferior, which is why people strive towards the opposite end of the spectrum.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Cause children are slaves, property of parents/govt - the owners are suppose to only do things for the benefit of the spawns or good of nation as whole to not be a psychopath. New humans can't consent themselves and it is impossible for the owner to know with enough degree of certainty of it'd be good for them to engage on their behalf because it's a big shit evolution built us around so it can have wide ranging effects in mind. Any consent here would an agreement between two adults for use of the kid, even assuming the kid doesn't give a shit and not ever affected, the setup is ethically weird, treating them like animals and shiet.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    because we're gonna kill you, dawg

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because children never grow up and think "gee im glad a creepy old man molested me when i was 10" you ignoramus. Off my board

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >"gee im glad a creepy old man molested me when i was 10" you ignoramus.

      Refer to

      That situation "never happens" because it's highly illegal and all the "good people" know better than to break a law that can get them in jail for life, while all the sociopathic people don't give a frick and just rape, decieve and do whatever they can to get away with it.

      You are dumbass for falling for the biggest selection bias in history.
      I unironically can't think of a bigger selection bias anywhere else in sociology.

      You are using very self-evident selection bias.

    • 2 weeks ago
      neanderthal kun

      pedophiles get the wall but i miss when i was 14 and cute enough for guys to try groom me online. ofc actual rape and sexual harassment is different

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Neusch

    I don't think it's appropriate but i do agree that there needs to be an actual case presented against it and not just an npc short-circuit tantrum about the topic.

    In short, here is why it's wrong, OP.
    Children, that is pre-pubescents, are not developed adequately physically or mentally for such an intimate relationship.
    Physically is pretty obvious, i mean you are a lot lot bigger than them, OP. It's not the imagery i want in my head but I'd imagine the attempt for, well... pentration, would be very painful and could cause serious injury.
    But worse than physical injury is the potential for psychological damage. Children do not have the mental capacity for it. Puberty brings the desire for sex but it also prepares you for it. Because it is the most intimate experience you can ever have with someone. It's a bonding process. An adult laying with a child sabotages their role of a protector and it just fricks the poor child up for life.
    So many homosexuals were raped as kids. So many drug addicts and people who are unable to function were raped as children and haven't been able to escape that trauma. The mental effects are the problem, OP.

    So there's a case against it, i suppose.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >well... pentration, would be very painful and could cause serious injury.
      You can have intimacy without penetrative sex.

      This is a nonsense argument and goes back to the fact that only sociopaths harm children.
      Any sensible person knows that an adult wiener wouldn't fit.

      >So many homosexuals were raped as kids. So many drug addicts and people who are unable to function were raped as children and haven't been able to escape that trauma.
      These rapists were sociopaths/ mentally ill people for the reason I outlined here:

      why is the idea that, even if youre in a position to exploit another person with less power than you, you shouldn't do it, so hard to figure out for some people? if i could have sex with a mentally disabled person, i probably just would not do it cause i recognize the inherent power imbalance of being able minded. that is not based on healthy relationship dynamics or mutual respect no matter how much (actual) pedos try to argue otherwise.

      This is a topic very hard to research, so I know you don't have anything back up what you're saying without excluding sociopaths and mentally ill people.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Neusch

        >You can have intimacy without penetrative sex
        Okay that may be so but your original post said:
        >I have never in my life heard of a good argument against sex with chiIdren
        That was my argument against that, not what you are saying now. And if you are excluding penetration then what exactly do you have in mind? And what ages do you deem acceptable?
        Because, and im not accusing you of this im just stating it, when you are talking about prepubescent kids you have to understand that a lot of 0-5's are still learning to talk. I don't think its acceptable to have intimate relations with someone who cannot communicate verbally or physically. I'm willing to hear your arguments though.
        >These rapists were sociopaths/ mentally ill people for the reason I outlined here
        Yeah I'm not denying that. But what's your proposal then? Like preparing a young bride for marrisge but not laying with her until she's ready? If it's like the Sneed case then there really isn't any reasonable detraction.
        >This is a topic very hard to research, so I know you don't have anything back up what you're saying
        Research on what? Backup which parts of what i said?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >And if you are excluding penetration then what exactly do you have in mind?
          Oral sex, rubbing genitals, using hands.
          "Realistic" e-girl porn usually doesn't feature penetration much.
          >And what ages do you deem acceptable?
          The age is irrelevant because I am not a pedo myself.
          We can say for the sake of argument we are talking about reducing the age of coomsent to 10.
          >Like preparing a young bride for marrisge but not laying with her until she's ready?
          Child marriage can definitely a viable route (and even legal in many states).

          I am more so talking about the hypothetical that this type of relationship is not inherently damaging to any party.
          You can make arguments that it's hard to safely arrange a bond between a child and an adult (like, do we want pedos in this hypothetical world to ask children out on a date at playgrounds?), but under specific circumstances, it can happen.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >without excluding sociopaths and mentally ill people.
        So literally cut out everyone that suffered the negative aftereffects of what you are arguing for that proves you are wrong so you can prove yourself right. Lol look at this pedo coping.

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hows about NO my friend. Did you know drinking fresh piss isnt harmful and some believe it has medicinal properties.
    Hows about you try some fresh piss?

    whats the good argument as why its bad to do this?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >whats the good argument as why its bad to do this?
      I've drunk my piss before. It's not morally bad, but it doesn't taste good.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Neusch

        Same. I only had a sip but it wasnt that bad. No desire to do it again though.

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    imo downies and mouthbreathing morons should be barred from ever having sex because their brain is never fully developed and they're basically being taken advantage. They can't consent like kids

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I haven't heard an argument that I agree with because I am a predator and hate being told such
    ftfy

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Every single person I know that were sexually abused as a child became extremely fricked up adults. Their brains are nowhere developed to comprehend what happened to them. When it starts in their brains esp in their teenage years really start to mess up since the brain knows it's not a good thing and starts a bunch of neurodevelopmental changes to help protect itself from what it considers severe trauma. This results in severe mental problems for life.

    Just admit you are a pedo, take yourself down to the police station and get yourself locked up fir life.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >take yourself down to the police station and get yourself locked up fir life.
      Alternatively, evade capture while engaging in the highest possible levels of mischief.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Pedos are kind of like commies. It's way easier to kill them than engage them in any kind of "debate".

      >without excluding sociopaths and mentally ill people.
      So literally cut out everyone that suffered the negative aftereffects of what you are arguing for that proves you are wrong so you can prove yourself right. Lol look at this pedo coping.

      Where are your arguments?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Arguments are for people.

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Pedos are kind of like commies. It's way easier to kill them than engage them in any kind of "debate".

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *