Is this member of the US military correct that women soldiers are a tactical advantage on the battlefield?

Is this member of the US military correct that women soldiers are a tactical advantage on the battlefield?
https://streamable.com/fqhpsx

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. Unlike the men the American females can just spread their legs and the odor alone will kill the enemy and all plants and wildlife within 8000 yards.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How the hell do you know that information?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Is this member of the US military correct that women soldiers are a tactical advantage on the battlefield?
      YES !!!
      YES ! YES ! YES ! YES ! YES ! YES ! YES !

      hahaha, yes, everything will be infected and contaminated !

      lol women love to say things that make themselves feel better but have no real basis in reality.

      they are good in mine clearing tho !

      Also, I don't hate women but you have to ignore them when they say shit like that. It doesn't have any actual meaning, it's just ego fluffing, nothing more. Smile and be polite, but don't take it serious.

      >you have to ignore them
      not possible, too obnoxious.

      Also, I don't hate women but you have to ignore them when they say shit like that. It doesn't have any actual meaning, it's just ego fluffing, nothing more. Smile and be polite, but don't take it serious.

      >I don't hate women
      yet. or something wrong with you.

      This is true, I heard all women platoons are killing it on the battlefield. They should draft all women and put them on the front lines

      >They should draft all women and put them on the front lines
      correct. they are way smarter and all!

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Women on the battlefield should count as biological warfare.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    lol women love to say things that make themselves feel better but have no real basis in reality.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Also, I don't hate women but you have to ignore them when they say shit like that. It doesn't have any actual meaning, it's just ego fluffing, nothing more. Smile and be polite, but don't take it serious.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I wish boys didn't have to learn that the hard way.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There's an old boomer trope in Canada where if a woman asks you to go to an operah and you say yes without arguing, she will lose interest in you.
        >If you argue with her and still say yes, she will lose interest in you.
        Only a flat out 'no and that's the end of it' is the correct answer. No matter how much of a fuss she makes. It's the only correct answer, if your intention to stay with her that is.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          My trope is I say, let's stay home and watch this opera and if you dont' like it then FRICK YOU. Mozart wrote it when he was 14.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >women ruin everything just ignore it

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    in combat, no.
    in theater, yes. in afghanistan at least women soldiers and female interpreters granted access to communications with local women.
    they make competent spies and saboteurs as well, assassins even.
    basically snitching backstabbing and manipulation.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And psyop homosexualry.

      t. sucker who always fall for it

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I will be sending you another drug addicted prostitute for your psychological operation

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That was something else.

          https://www.fakebook.com/AleksandraCarolina

          (I'm not sure this is her current profile and she photoshops everything all the time)

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Maybe this is a profile she made but it seems to be full of lies.

            https://br.linkedin.com/in/aleksandra-carolina-m%C3%BCller-7a897047

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      on the battlefield no. but they can be useful in the hospital, medical tents, chow halls, and also what this anon says

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        In the battlefield they dont not just not have advantage. They would be actively a detriment, for all kinds of reasons. The power of rape being used as leverage against uncaptured forces for example. Imagine a western military saying no too the demands of the enemy and then they release videos of the women being raped. It wouldn't happen because we would fold too the demands but if it did the public femoid outcry would be so much we'd probably run away from the war completely.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The can also operate drones in modern combat

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        not well. stfu

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No they can’t. They have a mental breakdown after a week of watching children getting blown up, and people getting mutilated.

        Plenty of research on the subject.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Plenty of research on the subject.

          Link it

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        drones

        Not when they suddenly discover that their little joystick controller is emitting a massive radio beacon that enemy artillery can zoom in on in a matter of a minute or two to slam their exact position within half a meter and turn them into bloody hamburger meat.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I assume that all enemies are acutely aware of my exact position at any given time. It's actually easier this way. At first, this operation appears as cumbersome and unnecessary, though after some time one begins to function in a manner of which slowly removes opportunity from the enemy. I think the trick here would be to setup somewhere kinda stupid, to try and bait out the arty first, at least that way you've got the initiative and you can force them to engage you where you want them. High IQ operators will swoop in for the kill, dump their radio controller and bug out, they're tracking that controller, not your body. Sarge might be pissed about it but frick, rather a new controller then operator, amirite?

          If it works you could start coordinating by jukeing out artys with radio beacons. Or how about using a drone to carry a radio beacon behind enemy lines to try and trick them into firing on their own positions. You could keep spamming this, they would have no choice but to either ignore them (in which case you just start blowing things up) or scramble every time a beacon pops up. Chirst that would frickup their battlenet something proper. The cost effectiveness too, it's like what $600 bucks for one of those controllers, you could have an entire platoon shitting bricks for weeks with this tactic

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Just connect your remote control to a 500m cable and set up the antenna 500m away from you.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Normally we're like 20-30 miles from the FLOT in an active zone. The COTS drones that you see Ukraine fly are normally either IN the battlefield or like a few kilometers away.

          t. Shadow Operator (RIP RQ-7B Miss ya big man GBNF)

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Women are generally terrible at hand eye coordination.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          lmao yea they can barely follow instruction or interact with the physical world. like they're just so clumsy and prone to dysfunction.
          Have you ever tried to give a woman instructions, even after she knows the way she did something was wrong? All they hear is you judging them and they will say 'okay' but not because they actually understood what you said, but only to get you to stop talking. And you'll come back to the same results as last time.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The US occupation in Afghanistan got outplayed by guerillas with little formal training using primitive communications, to the point they had to burn the files they could and flee by helicopter on livestream when they marched on Kabul without a fight from the already infiltrated local forces.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >believes the mainstream understanding
        ok

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Trust the plan, just 80 more years of failed proxy wars and we got 'em!

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >in combat, no.
      >in theater, yes. in afghanistan at least women soldiers and female interpreters granted access to communications with local women.
      >they make competent spies and saboteurs as well, assassins even.
      >basically snitching backstabbing and manipulation.

      FBDBDBDBDBDBDBBBDBDBD

      A study almost 10 years ago concluded that they were a detriment. New studies should be viewed with suspicion because there's no doubt the authors will be more concerned with their careers than the truth

      IMPOSSIBLE, I AM SOCKED

      there is not any agenda ... EVER :p

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >communications with local women
      Rounding up the pretty ones as concubines and shooting the rest doesn’t take much “communication”

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >in combat, no.
      >in theater, yes. in afghanistan at least women soldiers and female interpreters granted access to communications with local women.
      >they make competent spies and saboteurs as well, assassins even.
      >basically snitching backstabbing and manipulation.

      True. However, women are useless the moment they're faced with any kind of physical adversity. They will surrender without hesitation or conflict the moment they think it will save their own hide. And they can't keep their fricking mouths shut, so any sensitive data in their posession is getting leaked.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is true, I heard all women platoons are killing it on the battlefield. They should draft all women and put them on the front lines

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No cap I made my wife join the navy and I’ve just been knocking her up

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I seriously hope they didn't put her on a boat or you're not the only one smashing those guts

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          All he has to do is get her pregnant again. If a woman has two babies in her four years she'll basically never have to do anything and she still gets the GI bill and a VA loan for a house.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I was gonna say something negative because this place is poisoning my brain but I'm really happy for him. Hope is wife isn't a prostitute and would actually make a good mother, if that's the case he's basically luckier than 90% of us.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this. they are fricking like super soldiers. never seen anything like it

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No. If anything they are a liability because they are physically weaker, are more prone to injury and have worse spatial awareness of men.
    >t. watched females fall out of ruck matches when they started integrating them into combat arms

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they're better at taking selfies

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Cooom Bogged

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No. A blood sniffing drone or bomb would always be able to identify at least one unit, company, or battalion sized group of infantry on any given day of the month. Put all the feminists into one company or battalion. The first bomb finding its menstruating targets would send the rest back to the kitchen where they belong. Problem solved.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >would send the rest back to the kitchen

      the nightclub you mean, the one where they will go home with you if you have some good cocaine.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    As long as they can pull the trigger, they re cannon fodder anyway.
    Maybe joining the army with get them a sense of discipline for their twisted minds... or a new daddy on uniform LOL

    Ah, and be sexist, b***hes hate that.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i mean... ''don't be sexist, b***hes hate that''

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Are you sure you didn't mean "be sexist, b***hes love that"

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >As long as they can pull the trigger
      this.
      there is literally no difference.
      even children can shoot guns.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't think it matters for the US military. The US is getting liberated the moment the US picks a fight with China and it's coming. So what happens to the zogbots is irrelevant. I, for one, will welcome my new overlords. They will hate me less than my current overlords.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      When the chinks crossed the Yalu River the US Army and the rest of the UN forces just evaporated into thin air in a complete rout with total disintegration of units. Only the Turks and the USMC held it together.

      I don't expect most of you to beleive that so go and read Soldier by Col Anthony Herbert the most decorated soldier of the Korean War.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        China had a favorable position when they entered in to North Korea. It was practically home territory. While I do appreciate the history, it's got no bearing on what a new war with China would look like.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          yeah now they could wipe us out with one or two EMP detonations 500km over N. America. The entire electrial/communications grid would blow out and we'd starve and freeze in the dark.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They are not food self sufficient.
            >Xi said 'food security' over 40 times in a single speech just a couple years ago
            And where do you think they get most of their food imported from? The US and Brazil.
            Idk you're a chink yourself and are just biased or you're just browse reddit too much, but China is not the adversary you think it is. They would turn on Russia if they had to choose between starving and not starving.
            It's also written in Chink law that once the government can no longer improve the lives of its citizens that it is no longer legitimate. & that's their current arrangement. They don't ask questions as long as life improves.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Also the same reasons why they are so hesitant to invade Taiwan. Quality of life would plummet and they risk mass starvation depending on how the US responds.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      China can barely feed its own population even when all the ships are landing on time. Give me a break anon.
      >inb4 muh factory production
      Factories don't work when people are starving. & I don't think you realize just how quickly we could get all that back. I don't want to hear another word about China.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        News for the israelites;

        the USA is not the country it was in the 50's. Not even close.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Wars are industrial production competition. The US loses against fricking Russia. China will liberate us from this regime. Not that I like the chinks regime, but anything is better than inbread morons running this shithole into the ground. I would leave a long time ago, but my fricking wife became a patriot. I'd take chinks over this, though.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          4 years of biden and you're just gonna call in it? lol
          >Morale status: subverted

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >China can barely feed its own population even when all the ships are landing on time. Give me a break anon.
        erm lol: no.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          even president xi thinks you're a moron

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >They will hate me less than my current overlords.
      THIS!

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No. Women are weaker, fragile and cannot fight. They're women. They don't belong on a battlefield. That's why this prostitute is going to a conference. She isn't a soldier. She's just a blonde prostitute who's there to undermine actual soldiers.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    She looks extremely infertile.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, women are so great honestly only women should have to sign up for the selected service.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This. It should be 100% women. Men have had their time and laughably failed. I fully support the BAN ALL MEN FROM THE MILITARY movement.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Yes, women are so great honestly only women should have to sign up for the selected service
      no question about that!

      This. It should be 100% women. Men have had their time and laughably failed. I fully support the BAN ALL MEN FROM THE MILITARY movement.

      >This. It should be 100% women. Men have had their time and laughably failed. I fully support the BAN ALL MEN FROM THE MILITARY movement.
      holy based !

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A study almost 10 years ago concluded that they were a detriment. New studies should be viewed with suspicion because there's no doubt the authors will be more concerned with their careers than the truth

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They help the men get off before a gunfight it keeps their minds clear and their heads on straight

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Hamas breaks into IDF base
    >Hamas encounters two female IDF "soldiers"
    >the "soldiers" scream, beg for their lives, and hide under a table
    >Hamas kills them both
    "Soldiers"

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    WOULDN'T

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >comes into contact
    >taking fire
    >drops weapon and screams

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    can pussies queef on the battlefield?

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They're a weakness. You know what enemy soldiers are going to see when they see a woman? They're either going to try killing her or capturing her and rape her.

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    women in the military are a joke they are basically just prostitutes

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A fact none has mentioned yet is the "bloody Mary" phenomena, essentially women in positions of military control will forego concepts like Art of War's rules for conquest.
    Hearts and minds quickly flies out of the window because women see "enemy" and just throw troops and bombs, in the short run it leads to casualties and loss of equipment, in the long run it leads to an experienced enemy that knows your patterns of behaviour better.
    At the same time much like the white feather movement the women show such callousness towards life that an enemy can quickly be transformed into something you cannot intimidate, meanwhile your forces become demoralised.
    Simply put, because they aren't combatants they perceive war no different from war game practice, you could replace them with AI helpers for warfare.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      So you are telling me Russia is run by women?

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    maybe op is right and women are your only hope lmao

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Its like those silly RTS games like total war and whatnot: you send the chaff/gobbos at the front (women) to eat the initial salvos, reveal enemy positions then you strike with the main force (men).
    Its advantageous.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      As a connoisseur of Total War, you're not wrong. But that's only advantageous if you're at a disadvantage at firepower and/or on the defensive. Ideally, you'd always have the firepower advantage and just entrench around those guns while the enemy is the one sending in the chaff.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      As a connoisseur of Total War, you're not wrong. But that's only advantageous if you're at a disadvantage at firepower and/or on the defensive. Ideally, you'd always have the firepower advantage and just entrench around those guns while the enemy is the one sending in the chaff.

      sry meant
      >But that's only advantageous if you're at a disadvantage at firepower and/or on the *offensive

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Plausible. I know if I were fighting a bunch of bonus holes, I'd go out of my way to capture a few for me and the boys to have fun with, and in doing so could possibly offer opportunities for the enemy a more conventional objective wouldn't.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      and their sons will be future Finnish bvlls

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nah I wouldn't sully my lineage with non-finnish blood. It's brutal only anal rape for them, like we're talking about prolapsed buttholes and ruptured colons here. Maybe punch in their teeth and make them choke on my shit and blood smeared smegma-encrusted wiener between the anal rape sessions for variety. My only hope is my boys aren't a bunch of soi guzzling simps who get queasy from a bit of fun so I don't have to shoot them and I can get them onboard on a bit of Dirlewagner Brigade re-enactment. Oh boy you better believe I'm all for women in armed forces, if shit hits the fan well enough I wouldn't even wait to encounter actual enemy combatants if there's bonus holes wearing the same uniform I do available.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous
  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I hope she dies in Iran

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    We're going to need to send all these 30 year old women who can't find a man to commit to them to Iran to die for Israel
    its vital that we rid the world of these women

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      jesus christ. there's no way they'd allow pregnant women to fly shit that can pull high g's. just imagine the deformed skulls and other medical deformities.

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >First lieutenant OOONTZ
    riiiiiiiiiight.
    The AI is just trolling at this point.

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I can smell her coontz.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You know.... on closer inspection that could be COONTZ.

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >streamable
    why do you even bother?

    yes, they can be a tactical advantage. the soldiers will go from kill everyone to we need to capture that woman so i can rape her

  31. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    whenever someone brooches the concept of female soldiers to actual professional soldiers, the reaction is just eye-rolls, some of them just throw up their arms and walk out of the room

    that said, there are women who make big impacts in other ways besides pretending to be a fighting man

    females just aren't males

  32. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They are going to have to because i'm going to refuse to fight for this shit heap.

  33. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No it has been demonstrated that women in combat negatively impacts the performance of male soldiers.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But that was for said males being simps and breaking cover to rescue muh lady and shit. I'm absolutely convinced you can train simpness out of a guy if you put your mind to it.

  34. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What would anybody in the US military know about winning wars? They don't do that. They know absolutely nothing at all about that subject.

  35. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Is this member of the US military correct that women soldiers are a tactical advantage on the battlefield?
    Pick one:
    A) Woman
    B) Correct

  36. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >bonus hole required
    I think not.

  37. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Theyre having retention issues so theyre letting everybody join to pretend theyre combat ready and effective. its not like they need to be in combat. They just need to hang out in Hawaii and drive a hellcat or something.

  38. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    coontz, yup

  39. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    women in the military

  40. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    women naval aviators.

  41. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    a tactical advantage for the enemy, yes.

  42. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    women doing a simple task.

  43. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    When it comes to TDT's, yes.

  44. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    women without men vs men without women

  45. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The bible is right about women.

  46. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the military needs more women because it is a tactical advantage to retain women because the military needs more women don't you get it already? thats why i went to training how to retain more women because the military needs more women because its an advantage for the military to retain women

  47. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    She's fat.

  48. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He name is Coontz.
    Lt. Coontz.

  49. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Would rape.
    You're not allowed to walk around filming yourself in uniform with your phone. I hope this roastie's chain of command sees this and reprimands her severely.

  50. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, you can use them as bait for a third world rape horde.

  51. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    bump

  52. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    come to think of it maybe onlyfans isn't that bad of a career choice

  53. 4 weeks ago
    Analnonamous

    "Coontz" . . .nice one op

  54. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Coontz

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *