Japan launches State-Sponsored dating app

Japan government is pumping billions of dollar into a Japan-Tinder because the birth rate in the country has dropped so low

holy shit boys, this is the path to government issued girlfriends

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    i really dont this is going to change the fact that im ugly

  2. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    why are governments so stupid and straightforward
    this won't change shit. bet
    if anything, the app will become controversial and more problems will rise

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      A dating app creating actual relationships rather than hookups is counter productive to any reasonable motonization scheme. If its subsidized they might actually make it work

  3. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    All they have to do is pay influencers to say "men good", women are literally a hivemind

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      The US literally did this up until the 60s. The vast majority of media portrayed monogamous married couples raising families, and they couldn't be shown in bed together unless the actors were married to each other irl. I'm too much of a conspiracy theorist but the government does have the power to influence culture if they want to.

      It's ridiculous. Tokyo (this app seems to be made by the metropolitan government) is maybe the best place on earth to meet women. They're all over the place. If you can't get one the simple conclusion is they just don't want you. The most desirable Japanese men also aren't dumb, they know women are after money. So the Japanese government is run by senile senior citizens completely out of touch with reality

      >If you can't get one the simple conclusion is they just don't want you.
      Most men in Japan are overworked (on average 70hrs / week) and paid shit (they only make the equivalent of about $3,300 USD per year). Of course women don't want to live in a tiny apartment with a miserable dude who works all the time.

  4. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    How about they just end feminism, and lower the age of consent back to 13. Its so fricking simple, how do they not see this?

    Why does it seem like every politician who's job it is to try and fix these things never see the writing on the wall. Its like they're incapable of analyzing why a trend started in the first place and instead go straight into trying to fix it.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Feminism and the age of consent isn't the issue for that country the issue japan has is that everyone is working so hard they don't have time or money to have families

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        The issue is feminism and age of consent which is just an extension of feminism.

        Japanese people on average work less then Americans.

        >everybody is working
        Even in such a scenario, gee wouldn't it be interesting if only half of the population was constantly working? I wonder how that would effect birth rates. Probably not at all right.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Why do you want 13 year old girls to be getting pregnant dude raising the age of consent won't solve birth rate issues you're just weird

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Lowering I meant

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            You are actually moronic. Explain to me how lowering the age of consent doesn't increase birth rates.
            Men would then have access to legal access to pursue younger women. Who do you think will have more children in their life time, the 16 year old girl who was just married or the the woman who just got married when she was 30 because she was raised to believe she should be a career focused girl boss?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            The age of consent is already 16 in a lot of US states and they still don't go for creepy autistic 30 year old manlets.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            The age of consent is 18 in most of the U.S.
            >eeew he likes young fertile women so creepy
            >wait why are birth rates declining?

            Again, so fricking moronic and incapable of analysis

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            homie I'm 20 and 16 year olds look like babies to me

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            I know you don't believe that my Black person.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            The national average is 16 with Arkansas being the lowest at 15 and Oregan 18

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            There is restricted and unrestricted age of consent. These places you claim have an age of consent of 16 are actually places in which only under 18's are allowed to frick 16 year olds. In other states if you have more money or a "position of authority" over them its still illegal.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Nta but why do you people want to frick kids so bad nothing about "muh fertility" because the leading cause of death in women under the age of 18 is child birth this is what I mean when I say all men are opportunistic pedophiles and abusers

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >nta
            Go back to whatever shithole you came from.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >the leading cause of death in women under the age of 18 is child birth
            No actually its unintentional injuries, then cancer, then suicide, then birth defects(not giving birth but being genetically defective from birth)

            Could you provide a source for that claim?

            The fact of is is human biology happened for a reason and 16 year old women are capable of having kids. Why?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Then why do you want it lowered to 13?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Because its naturalistic and good for a healthy society regardless of birth rates.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            13 year olds are at high risk of complications of birth and poor health of their newborns. Naturalistic is like 15-16 year olds marrying 20 year old men. Just because you missed your chance for teenage love and dicky doesn't mean you can lie to yourself and others to try and fulfil your perversions.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Personally I'm a fan of the 14 year old age of consent, my reference to 13 years old age of consent is because it was the age of consent in one Japanese prefecture around 2010 when you were still a 7 year old you fricking newbie Black person.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            I was 13 actually, and most of the newbies here were born in like 2006, time flies...

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Nah, you're just an uber homosexual newbie who talks like a Black person. You don't belong on this website at all. When did you even discover NSFFW? the last year? go away.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            You post like you're trying to convince me you're an oldgay.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Nah, I'm just posting all the dicky shit I can find. I'm not an oldgay but I'm far older than you.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            https://www.who.int/health-topics/adolescent-health/pregnancy-and-childbirth-complications-are-the-leading-cause-of-death-among-15-19-year-old-girls#tab=tab_1 Okay here's your source

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            LMFAO misleading title, here in the very article you sent me

            >An estimated 1.1 million adolescents die each year. The leading causes are road traffic injuries, suicide and interpersonal violence. Millions of adolescents also experience illness and injury. Causes of mortality and morbidity among adolescents differ by sex and age, and also by geographic region.

            you didn't even read it lol, you're so desperate to "win" a debate.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Not the same anon:

            https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4418963/

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >no ascii text allowde

            Different age groups have different risks for complications is essentially what is said.

            Summary
            Our findings underscore the need for pregnant women to be aware of the risks associated with extremes of age so that they can watch for signs and symptoms of such complications.

            Again, you're just frantically trying to find evidence in your favor when there really isn't any. You are incredibly biased and a homosexual.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Not any of those anons but your argument doesn't even matter because no 13 year old girl will date you sorry anon and society won't suddenly change one day and and think it's amazing for 14 year olds to frick 40 year old men

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >society won't change one day
            As birth rates decline it will continue to change into a more per-industralized society. One in which 15 year olds get married to 25 year olds. Cope newbie.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            You will be 50 by then and the 25 year olds will still be frowning at you for walking near enough to a cute teenage girl.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Why do you keep trying to make a sociology argument into an argument about my personally? Just admit you're wrong.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Wrong about what? I responded to a prediction you made of a time that hasn't come yet. You aren't as smart as you think you are.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Wrong that feminism and as an extension of that age of consent doesn't decrease the birth rate. You have been proven wrong and are now attempting to attack my character like a woman as if I'm not an anonymous person on the internet and suddenly a gang of chad are going to appear to beat me up for a chance at your pussy.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            You're confusing people replying to you because you're a fricking idiot. I never said that feminism had nothing to do with childbirth, all I said was 13 years old isn't the healthiest time to have a child. I linked something that directly contradicted your claims and you shut your eyes to it and posted the only snippet that didn't remotely hurt your case.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            When did I claim that 13 year olds are the healthiest age to have children. I said they were the most productive and I meant they are the most productive in a monogamous system.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            The low birth rates are just going to be offset with more immigration.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            2nd generation immigrants also have low birth rates. If the third world adopts feminism and enforces age of consent they will also have declining birth rates.

            Also don't even bring this discussion into race. You know you'd be losing again.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            You probably won't run out of third world populations to keep getting more immigrants from if the prior instances of immigrants don't have enough kids either.
            Anyway this is literally how the issue is being addressed: with more immigration. It isn't a hypothetical solution. It's already what's been happening.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, and its the reason western empires are currently in decline.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            You will be old/dead and no teen girl will want to frick you

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Pregnant women who were 15 - 19 years old had greater odds for severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, postpartum hemorrhage, poor fetal growth, and fetal distress.

            It's literally right there. You said I was frantically searching for something but you missed it when it was right in your face, you fricking idiot.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Not to mention our culture demonizing even large age gaps among couples.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            So why is it a bad thing that birth rates are declining? Tell me in your own words. This

            I don't understand why so many people are fretting about our overpopulated countries finally decreasing in population size. COVID proved to me and everyone else who was paying attention that a sizeable portion of the population is useless eaters who get by doing pointless jobs. I can't think of many downsides, other than maybe having less manpower in the event of war, but given that nukes are a thing for the first time in human history the odds of any large-scale warfare going on is very low. Wages for jobs would be more competitive with fewer workers in the pool, less competition for housing, resources, infrastructure wouldn't be as strained as it is now, less impact on the environment, etc. Plus the only Men I see who are impacted by modern social norms who can't find a gf or wife are usually chinless spergy manlets or other invalid social misfits who (thankfully) will never breed.

            guy makes a decent point. Modern society has fundamentally changed compared to any civilization we've ever had. That and the amount of seething meek inceloids it has generated is hilarious to witness.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            I never said it was a bad thing in particular. I just said why its occurring. Eventually when the population declines feminism will be eradicated and birth rates will increase until humanity finds a natural balance.

            However its awful in the current state. Every modern nation has elderly welfare programs. Our societies have been built on the assumption of constant population growth and without it our infrastructure will crumble and every single young persons economic ability will also crumble with it.

            A quick mass die off would be economically beneficial but that isn't whats happening. Its a slow steady die off of older populations and yet the population still grows because of immigrants so you won't even see the benefits of that. Basically you're getting completely fricked.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >Eventually when the population declines feminism will be eradicated and birth rates will increase until humanity finds a natural balance.
            Explain your reasoning.

            >However its awful in the current state. Every modern nation has elderly welfare programs. Our societies have been built on the assumption of constant population growth and without it our infrastructure will crumble and every single young persons economic ability will also crumble with it.
            That's due to overpopulation and misallocation of resources.

            >A quick mass die off would be economically beneficial but that isn't whats happening. Its a slow steady die off of older populations and yet the population still grows because of immigrants so you won't even see the benefits of that. Basically you're getting completely fricked.
            That's because corporations want cheap, expendable, mass labor.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >Explain your reasoning.
            women are useless and produce nothing of real value. When the population declines, so too will many of the amenities of modern society. When there are only 200 million people on the planet, getting a plan to Japan will be very difficult as well getting the raw minerals needed to produce things like iphones let alone the number of people needed to write and upkeep software for these devices.

            How are you going to maintain all of the roadways and production facilities with so few people. Society will revert to a more simple process, survival will become more difficult and women will seek men for protection and survival when it gets really bad.

            Feminism is not reality. In the same way a programmer would die without electricity,"empowered women" will not survive without modern society. Its is an ideology built entirely off the back of modern society.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >electricity,"empowered women" will not survive without modern society. Its is an ideology built entirely off the back of modern society.
            Let's go very far back, society today would not exist at all if women weren't there in cave times birthing new humans to populate the earth they were also hunting with the men too and weren't just sitting around

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >the were hunting with the men too

            LMFAO so this is the final result of zoomer brainwashing. I can't believe it. You're actually fully brainwashed and moronic. No women were not hunting. There are 0 matriarchal societies and thats because it simple does not work nor is it natural. Women are weak. Their bone structure itself is designed to birth children making athletic activities far more difficult. They are also less intelligent and less capable of tracking movement.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Literally just google it it's such a myth that women weren't doing that any modern day prehistoric scientist will tell you wrong kek

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Nobody said that they weren't doing anything. While men were hunting for 8 to 12 hours a day, women would forage and do equally time consuming tasks like crush wild grains into something edible and mantain tools.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Some did. When they did so, it was notable enough for them to receive special burials. Ergo, most of them did not hunt or do battle, or else the ones who did wouldn't be special or decorated.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            No, they didn't. They simply did not hunt and there is no evidence they did. Besides the argument that 0.0000001% of genetic freaks of women hunted is not proof women are mens equals.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Do we have evidence for one way or another? How would we know which gender used the tools that they left behind?

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >Do we have evidence for one way or another? How would we know which gender used the tools that they left behind?

            Otzi but also biology. If women were the athletics of the human race they would be athletic today and they're not.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >If women were the athletics of the human race they would be athletic today and they're not.
            The average size of the western man

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Gaslighting.
            Read the Iliad if you want a look at warfare was actually LIKE in the centuries before Christ.
            >frickhuge man just picks up a giant rock and yeets it down a hill to kill people
            >literally throwing javelins
            >literally shot-putting fricking rocks at each other like they're fastballs because frick you
            >"Hey, frickface the fleetfooted, go sprint half-naked across this field with a river in the middle and don't get tackled/stabbed/shot/drowned, go deliver this shit/message, btw if you get caught you totally die"
            >men just swinging pieces of fricking metal at each other
            >dudes who are already wearing metal wrestling in mud, to the death
            >basically planning rugby/football tactics in your tent and then acting them out on a LITERAL field, with ACTUAL objectives on the field
            It's fricking sports, dude. Of course it was mostly men.
            >but what if I want to be Katniss Everdeen
            Bowstrings are heavy, or at least the draw is. It's like a resistance band. Men.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >How would we know which gender used the tools that they left behind?
            Because they're usually buried with them. That's why he find graves of women with fishing hooks and other tools that they would have made while the men were away.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >Erm no they did not hunt! women can't can't do that..trust me bros I was there and their weak bone structures couldn't handle that..
            Also nobody is saying women are men's equals

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >feminism would work because women use to hunt just like men
            >uuh nobody is saying women are men's equals

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            By and large, you're right, and the one in a million woman who actually DID do otherwise is just the exception that proves the rule
            No society in history has had women filling that role at scale

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            I can't believe I used to say dumb shit like this when I was still in gradeschool and genuinely thought it was intelligent or well-informed, holy shit. Nostalgic cringe.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            And then? You spent too much time on the internet and got groomed into becoming a troony.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            It doesn't make sense for women to participate in large-scale conflicts prior to the invention of AT LEAST slings and arrows, and even after that warfare was largely a giant game of fricking rugby where athletic men in padding would smash into each other and sprint around fields trying to capture territory.
            Like I don't mean to be a dick but they're not as big so it doesn't make sense to have them on the front lines and even little dudes have higher muscle density on average so you'd probably want stout little men or wiry little boys for your runners and messengers and stuff too instead of women
            Like, again, not even trying to be an butthole, but look at sports

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >women are useless and produce nothing of real value.
            My wife works in a lab that serves several hospitals in the region and brings home six figures a year in addition to my salary working as an Engineer at a well-known car manufacturer. You on the other hand are probably a net drain to society.

            >When the population declines, so too will many of the amenities of modern society.
            And yet when COVID hit all of my services (electricity, water, internet, food, etc) continued to function. My only gripe was the mask mandates.

            >When there are only 200 million people on the planet
            We'll never get that low unless some cataclysmic event happens like a real pandemic or solar flair, unlikely to happen in our lifetimes.

            >getting a plan to Japan will be very difficult as well getting the raw minerals needed to produce things like iphones let alone the number of people needed to write and upkeep software for these devices.
            Welcome to the 4th Industrial Revolution. I remember this topic covered very well during my days at uni. AI and mass automation will continue well into this century until the only jobs left for humans are highly specialized niches.

            >How are you going to maintain all of the roadways and production facilities with so few people.
            By not using people, read above.

            >Society will revert to a more simple process, survival will become more difficult and women will seek men for protection and survival when it gets really bad.
            I can see that happening if it got really bad, but that's not going to happen and most inceloid bloodlines are destined to die out in the next ~50-100 years.

            >Feminism is not reality. In the same way a programmer would die without electricity,"empowered women" will not survive without modern society. Its is an ideology built entirely off the back of modern society.
            Most of these cope posts always have societal collapse as the main reason that somehow, someway some inceloid subhuman might manage to reproduce.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >My wife works in a lab that serves several hospitals in the region and brings home six figures a year
            Doing literally nothing of value.

            I love to see the cope. You're already trying to puff yourself up with fake or real income as if its going to change the course of the argument. Not even going to bother reading the rest of your normalgay drivel. You've already lost the argument.

            Oh and remind me again how many children do you have? Being so rich obviously you must have many children. That makes sense right, because your life is proof that feminism is not at fault for low birth rates.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >Doing literally nothing of value.
            She's the one who runs the tests that are ordered by doctors and tells the doctors what is wrong with the patients. Do you think the doctors take one look at a patient and tell them "You have cancer". Medicine isn't like the movies. She's instrumental in providing the doctors with everything they need to diagnose a patient. Plus the extra 6 figures per year isn't "nothing", a sizeable chunk of it is going into investments, savings, etc that will be passed onto our 5 children when we die.

            >Not even going to bother reading the rest of your normalgay drivel.
            You lost the argument about 3 posts ago. You've yet to even explain in detail your position or how it contradicts mine. Shitting on the chess board is not a legal move. But one thing you can look forward to is returning to whatever shithole you work for on Monday or drawing in whatever pittance in NEETbux society has deemed worthy of you to continue rotting away in your parents house or no doubt tiny ass apartment.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >Eventually when the population declines feminism will be eradicated and birth rates will increase until humanity finds a natural balance.
            they are purposefully killing off the population already, birth control, abortion, various pharma products, food products, encouragement of gender wars

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >So why is it a bad thing that birth rates are declining?
            Because our governments are run by traitors who use low birthrates as an excuse to import millions of violent subhuman shitskins who will inevitably destroy thousands of years of progress and culture because they're incapable of creating or maintaining complex societies.
            Either we have kids or it all goes down the drain. I have no delusions as to where we are heading, but I want there to be people capable of rebuilding after it all burns down.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Just travel to central america, i hear the age of consent is 10-12

            Then you can have a childwife you can teach about cooking and cleaning and keep her away from american colleges, maybe ven get her interested in some of your hobbies!

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            I'm an incel loser, I'm not going to do that plus I'd need a white woman. I have a family and other social obligations that would forever prevent me from doing such a thing as well. It would be social suicide even if I could pull it off.

            All I'm stating is the undeniable fact that the age of consent has lowered birth rates in society.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Children being born from teenagers aren't a good addition to society kek

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, thats why everyone born before the 60's was so unproductive and messed up. kek.

            meanwhile everyone is on drugs and going to psychologists now.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Teenage pregnancies have greater health risks for both the mother and child, though.
            >Adolescent mothers (aged 10-19 years) face higher risks of eclampsia, puerperal endometriosis and systemic infections than women aged 20-24 years, and babies of adolescent mothers face higher risks of low birth weight, preterm birth and severe neonatal condition.
            >https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/adolescent-pregnancy

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        They dude you're replying to is moronic however the "working hours" cope is straight up false because mexico, the hardest working country in the world, has a higher birthrate than japan

  5. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I don't understand why so many people are fretting about our overpopulated countries finally decreasing in population size. COVID proved to me and everyone else who was paying attention that a sizeable portion of the population is useless eaters who get by doing pointless jobs. I can't think of many downsides, other than maybe having less manpower in the event of war, but given that nukes are a thing for the first time in human history the odds of any large-scale warfare going on is very low. Wages for jobs would be more competitive with fewer workers in the pool, less competition for housing, resources, infrastructure wouldn't be as strained as it is now, less impact on the environment, etc. Plus the only Men I see who are impacted by modern social norms who can't find a gf or wife are usually chinless spergy manlets or other invalid social misfits who (thankfully) will never breed.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      The wealthy need number to go up forever, and especially people to buy their ridiculously inflated real estate.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >I don't understand why so many people are fretting about our overpopulated countries finally decreasing in population size.
      Do you not have a job, anon? In the US for example you have social security which gives you regular payouts after you start drawing from it (usually some time in your 60s).
      If you have way fewer young people in the future then there won't be enough money going into social security and you'll end up not getting paid as an old man even though you paid into it for other old men your entire working life.
      That's why we need to import lots of immigrants. Because no one's having kids and the immigrants make up the difference. Even the illegal immigrants help because they get fake social security numbers in order to get real jobs and then their employers will take social security taxes out of their pay.
      tl;dr we need more people one way or another or else you won't get old man benefits in the future and civilization will collapse.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        I had the foresight to invest into my future in the form of hard assets, 401k, a retirement plan, etc.
        If you're too fricking moronic to plan for what you're going to live off when you can't work anymore, or don't have any real skillsets or intelligence to get a decent paying job then you deserve whatever happens to you. Society isn't going to collapse if we have to cram a bunch of old codgers into hastily built public housing and pay a team of morons a pittance to wipe their asses.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >I had the foresight to invest into my future in the form of hard assets, 401k, a retirement plan, etc.
          Who do you think is making that shit grow? Value is created by young people working and spending their money not by grandpa shitting his diaper for the second time today

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            kek, Boomers are already getting a rough awakening to the fact that nobody is able to afford the properties they were hoping to sell and retire off. The generations that come after them are going to have it even worse, especially as the population declines, fewer men participate in "formal" work and the middle class disappears.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            If Covid was any indicator they would try to throw the elderly under the bus to keep the gears grinding.
            There is no such thing as retirement you will be milked to a hollow husk then promptly discarded to make way for the next generation ad nauseam.
            Any form of wealth you try to trickle down to subsequent generations through inheritance to make their lives easier would be taxed to oblivion.
            Nations don't give two shits about the well being of their citizens and preserving their heritage they are more concerned with profits as evidenced by a heavy reliance on immigration to suppress wages all the while propping up demand.
            Even the most tyrannical monarchs in history haven't sold their nations as they do now.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          That's a spicy opinion but in reality yes, civilization would collapse if the US government defaulted on social security payments. Benefits payments (social security and medicare primarily) are the majority of the national debt everyone is always on edge about. There's going to be 80 million people over age 65 as soon as 2040 and most of them aren't that well off financially. You can't cut off benefits and throw 80 million people into public housing because you personally wouldn't mind it lol. Are you 12? Get real.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          And yet you still pay into social security and will receive nothing for your wasted wealth.

  6. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I'm 100% confused how bumble and matchgroup haven't been sued for fraud.

  7. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    It's ridiculous. Tokyo (this app seems to be made by the metropolitan government) is maybe the best place on earth to meet women. They're all over the place. If you can't get one the simple conclusion is they just don't want you. The most desirable Japanese men also aren't dumb, they know women are after money. So the Japanese government is run by senile senior citizens completely out of touch with reality

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >So the Japanese government is run by senile senior citizens completely out of touch with reality
      That's the truth. The only thing that will actually raise birthrates in Japan is career stability and higher wages for men so that they're in a position to be providers or for Japanese women to understand that the Bubble has burst and that women can't expect men to provide for them, their kids and their parents without the woman also working just as hard.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >or for Japanese women to understand that the Bubble has burst and that women can't expect men to provide for them, their kids and their parents without the woman also working just as hard.
        But iirc women are still expected to quit after getting married/pregnant. Plus there are high expectations put on mothers' domestic work (women are still expected to do the majority of household chores, japan still hasn't yet started widely using some technologies that help speed up chores like dryers or dishwashers, moms are judged by their kids' bentos, etc.) so you can't expect women to start contributing equally to the household income until the expectations for them to be a homemaker lessen.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >But iirc women are still expected to quit after getting married/pregnant. Plus there are high expectations put on mothers' domestic work (women are still expected to do the majority of household chores, japan still hasn't yet started widely using some technologies that help speed up chores like dryers or dishwashers, moms are judged by their kids' bentos, etc.) so you can't expect women to start contributing equally to the household income until the expectations for them to be a homemaker lessen.
          Literally nothing you said is true in 2024. Why do you pretend your a Japanese expert because you watch anime or jvloggers 10 years ago?

  8. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >japan is combating drug addiction by spending billions of yen on giving away free drugs to addicts
    bold strategy cotton

  9. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    If they have to ban anime or vidya to raise their birth rate, so be it.

  10. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    As much as this is being memed online, it's not a dating app. It's specifically a matchmaking service for people who intend to actually reproduce.

  11. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Their birth rates are a result of the fact that women, when their basics needs are met, have little to no interest in most men. In fact, they are disgusted by the average man. This app won't do anything except help women have sex on birth control with the few Japanese chads they have. Ngl though, I have no clue how Japanese men distinguish themselves as better than each other, arr rook same and I guess it's why their population is going down even though Asian men seem handsome to me. If you imported bottom of the barrel white men to Japan, pregnancies would skyrocket. It's depressing how much Asian women worship White men on little to no virtue.

  12. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >state-sponsored dating app
    Most state sponsored apps are shit to begin with, never mind apps. Governments intentionally misdesign them.
    https://www.npr.org/2023/05/12/1175948642/migrants-are-frustrated-with-the-asylum-claim-app-even-after-the-latest-overhaul

  13. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    any way to use this as westerner? Is it linked on ID? I mean if I get tangible, credible results testing it out as whitu piggu, I'm gonna move to Japan and help their birthrate I don't give a frick

  14. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >Japanese Illuminati sitting on their feet in a circle around a dimly-lit floor table
    >I imagine that they're each wearing business suits but with a different stylized mask
    >Tengu: "HUWHY TSUTEY SUTIRU NOTTO FACKU"
    >Ninetails: "AKA-CHYAN NO TAME NI SUPAIxFAMIRY WO TSUKURIMASHITA, K-KEE-DO..."
    >Tengu: "SOU HUWHY NOT FACK?! WE INVITE SEXY GAIJIN, WE DO FREE HOUSE IN TOKYO, WE RITE GAINAX **ON FACKING FIRE**, STIRR NO AKACHYAN SO WHY NO FACK??"
    >Oni: "KONO BAAAAIII NI WAHHHH~, PAH-HAPPUSSUUU WE ROOK TO TECHNOROGY"

  15. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Why cant they just inseminatw themselves with Asian Chad sperm from the sperm bank? Why are women so animal brained that they need fricky fricky to have kids?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      When they use sperm banks they want Danish Chad instead. I remember a few years back reaading about some nip woman who's a tv presenter in Korea who did this. She went home to get the procedure done and it was with a Norfman Chad's sperm.

  16. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Meme entirely fricking related

  17. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    No one can afford anything there, why the frick would they think wasting even more money on useless dating propaganda would do anything? Chinkland has been doing the same thing. Most of the kids born will just end up starving to death then taking their mother with them at the rate shit's going over there. I hate lizard people so fricking much. Stop focusing on eternal growth and fix the broken fricking economy, first.

  18. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I hope I get a chance, I'm already planning on living there once I start building my networth. Hopefully ww3 doesn't end up causing revelation to start, that's if it has already started

  19. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Watasi ha nihon no ko ga suki ni natte kekkon simasu. Siawase tbh.

  20. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Where's the source, OP? I wanna read about this.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      https://apnews.com/article/dating-births-marriage-japan-technology-42b2685cb0bea35a69ca3318c3af48c7

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *