Lord of the Rings is Homosexual abomination

and should be banned everywhere. Tolkien was gay

Terry Davis: They Glow, You Shine Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Terry Davis: They Glow, You Shine Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wow, tolkien was an anti-semite!

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Wow, tolkien was an anti-semite!
        Fricking israelite.
        Of course he would be. The israelites were destroying the world.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      rangz of kangz: ug og

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >and then all the blacks became huge tolkien fans

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Looks good

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      AW LAWDY DEM RANGS

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Funny thing is that's not a real quote.

  2. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    N

  3. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    The only homosexual is op

  4. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Tokien understood brothership and camaraderie in a way that we are culturally incapable of appreciating. I think it is difficult for modern audiences to understand a platonic love for Smeagol despite his flaws because they do not love God nor themselves

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      they think any kind of brotherly love means taking it in the ass. they got israeliteed bit ime

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        The very premise of this argument is that romantic and/or sexual intimacy reduces potency of friendship, that two friends who were intimate in that way are less friends that those who weren't

        it's a very boring worldview and it always comes from people who are bad at sex so they constantly try to demonize and ruin it for everyone else

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          Sexual intimacy doesn't happen between friends. It can only happen between "friends". It absolutely and irrevocably cheapens the relationship. This isn't boring you homosexual, this is how the relationships developed before the israelites spread their gayfotry wide open and for everyone to see.
          There is no sex between friends and this is why they are FRIENDS. Not frick buddies not some horny colleagues or a myrriad other things. They are friends and friendship is platonic at its very basic and fundamental level.
          Stop trying to spread your homosexual talking points. They won't work.
          Go frick your buddies you forever alone, yet sex having homosexual.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Sex is awesome and deepens the friendship. Sex was always a part of human relationships because it's fun and enables you to make your friend feel nice

            Claiming otherwise is simply not true, sex wasn't present only when people were socially prevented from being friends or when they weren't true friends in the first place

            For example, a victorian man couldn't become a friend with a woman and therefore he couldn't have sex with a female friend. His male "friendships" were fake, he was never allowed to be who he is around his male "friends" so they never truly knew him or his soul

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            shut up gay

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's ironic how close male friendships are considered "gay" now when if you'd observe actual homosexuals, you'd notice they treat each other in a very impersonal manner. Like they're co-workers that sometimes see each other in the hallway instead of just getting done fricking each other's butts.

  5. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >orc objects to Tolkienism
    many such cases

  6. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Then why did you watch it?

  7. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Just finished the return of the king extended edition. The hobbit movies suck. You can see that they were miserable when they made them. That's what watching the hobbit movies feels like, it's line Danny Devito in twins. Original 3 movies extended cuts. It will never get better than that.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >You can see that they were miserable when they made them
      you might be right about that thinking of it. theres very little brightness in the movies at all

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Look at the behind the scenes. It's Martin Freeman (Bilbo) flicking off the camera, looking like an absolutely miserable c**t. After the 12th identical clip of him flicking off the camera you get the vibe the there was little joy to be had and that if there was he certainly was not contributing any. Ian Mckellan famously broke down in tears from all the green screen work.

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          why? what changed, or was it the same on LOTR?

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            The LOTR movies are some of the finest cinematography ever made and it was likely obvious while working on set. The Hobbit movies were cash-grab bullshit that nobody asked for.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            A decade of production hell. Gulliermo del Toro (Hellboy) was attached to the movie as director since forever then Peter Jackson had to step back in at the last moment. It was an unfaithful adaptation as well. Lord of the Rings is a 3 book adult fantasy series. The Hobbit is a single book with a much more straight forward narrative without the broader world playing into the events nearly as much. The Hobbit was turned into 3 movies and set up as some kind of epic prequel, likely because it was a cash grab as the other anon said. I'm sure the people on set were aware and God knows Peter Jackson didn't want to be there. That and the change in technology used meant that they moved away from practical effects to CGI which makes the acting worse because the actors are not immersed in their surroundings, they clearly stand apart from them, unaffected by them.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            its really too bad. hate to think of them not wanting to be on those sets.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            I think the only way it ever could have worked is if Peter Jackson made it a faithful single movie adaptation and released it before LOTR. There is no way for the story to live up to the epic scope of LOTR so to try is to fail in this case, simply by virtue of it being released after the first films, irrespective of the other issues it faced.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Objectively speaking the original LOTR trilogy is overrated. Too much is lost to cinematography, yet it still skips around wildly at times, then devotes half a movie to a single battle.
            They made some improvements to the base story as well, to make it more suitable for film, which are adequate changes, but it doesn't really do justice to the books. It might be impossible to translate the material any better into a Hollywood movie.
            Naturally The Hobbit is way worse, but so it the book, being a children's novel and predating the complexity LOTR later developed.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            They're not overrated. There aren't that many good movies to begin with, the trilogy easily mogs most if not all other movies. In the sense of comparing it to the books, it doesn't hold up because its structured entirely differently. But that wasn't the point anyways. It was as faithful as a hollywood movie could be. This is literally the best we can get.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Cinema is unable to capture linguistic subtlety. While the bandwidth of language is low, it is (to a degree) more free of the time dimension than a moving picture. A picture may be worth a thousand words, but a thousand words are worth 10,000 pictures.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            The Hobbit was a better story despite being “for children”, imo.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Sneed sells feed and seed, which is completely normal. Chuck, on the other hand, sells frick and suck.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            True but I think at a certain point the criticism is more against the medium than the product. Books will always be superior. I just finished reading dune and David Lynch did the best so far but the movie is essentially unfilmable. If you actually pay attention to Herberts writing you will realize that he doesn't describe a lot of what the characters are experiencing. He will simply state that they moved here or there and leave the action totally to ones imagination.
            The Road is probably the best example I can think of. Reading that book is like like doing acid in an arctic tundra. There is no way to capture Mccarthys prose on film, which is why the movie sucked.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            lol get a load of this nerd.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            How would you feel if you didn't have breakfast this morning?

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            I don't know because I don't read stupid nerd books about goblins and fairies and shit. Fricking Harry Potter losers. Real men read historical fiction about naval warfare in the Napoleonic era by Patrick O'Brien or C.S. Forester.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            So why are you in this thread if you don't read fiction?

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            shit homie, sometimes you gotta race

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            I didn't realize I was talking to a sixteen year old from 2003.

            To make fun of homosexuals like you, duh.
            >I juSt ReAd DuNe aNd FrAnK HeRbErT iS sOOoOOOo seXy OMG I WaNt HiS hOt StEaMy lOaD aLl oVer My LiPs

            Reading is Nice. It's way more enjoyable than viewing but it's hard to get the time and space to pay proper attention to a book. I'm sorry that you think it's bad. Your life is poorer for it.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            you know the reference, 35 year old

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Older than that.

            The first step in reading is actually knowing how to perceive and retain the information that is written. I never said reading was bad, just the nerd shit (you) read. I bet you jerk off while reading Douglas Adams, don't you. You can tell the truth. You're among friends.

            Funny that you're into historical non fiction and you call other people nerds. That shit it straight up boring and unreadable. Guys who are into non fiction military history are grade a humor less autists.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Still can't read
            Only the best movie ever made was based off a Patrick O'Brian book. And there was no feminist propaganda in it either. Nor hoblits or elves or hairy-mary made up fantasy creatures. Fricking nerd.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah but it was a famously shitty and unreadable novel. Sorry bud but you are the nerd here. Every author you mention is one that I haven't read. You have a very fanciful imagination for a non fiction dork.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >hasn't read
            >unreadable
            Just because it wasn't written for children doesn't mean you shouldn't give it a shot. Imagine being older than 35 and still obsessed with fairy tales.
            >the orgsnorks are attacking! Use your flim-flams to deflect their powers! Omg my magic rinkgs!

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's not written in an enjoyable way. I'm not enough of a nerd to enjoy obtuse prose. I'm glad that you are studious and dedicated enough to derive pleasure from older literature like that. It's admirable. I'm just not as big of a nerd as you are unfortunately. I wish I could say that I was.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            The first step in reading is actually knowing how to perceive and retain the information that is written. I never said reading was bad, just the nerd shit (you) read. I bet you jerk off while reading Douglas Adams, don't you. You can tell the truth. You're among friends.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            To make fun of homosexuals like you, duh.
            >I juSt ReAd DuNe aNd FrAnK HeRbErT iS sOOoOOOo seXy OMG I WaNt HiS hOt StEaMy lOaD aLl oVer My LiPs

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            they are going to try to make blood meridian again and i am not looking forward to it

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous
        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          flicking what? A booger? I don't get it.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            >flicking what?
            The bird

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            you're among friends. you can say Black person.

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's called "flipping the bird". Don't you ever come between me and some moron I'm making fun of ever again if you value all you hold dear. I will fricking end you, you upside-down, platypus fricking, weird-accent haver.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      > The hobbit movies suck. You can see that they were miserable when they made them.
      Watch the making of on youtube. Peter Jackson has a breakdown at one point and orders everyone off set. It was basically a massive clusterfrick as he was forced to take over the project because the publishing company stalled to force del Toro out.
      This vid summarises it: https://youtu.be/20vA9U7J2qQ

  8. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Everyone was an homosexual during those years at english universities. British people are all closet homosexuals.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      The Brits were never in the closet. Most people drank too much to remember shit back then.

  9. 4 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      What the frick lmao, isn't the golem guy the hobbit guys uncle or some shit like that too?

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        No.
        They are unrelated, they are also two different brand of hobbits

        • 4 months ago
          Anonymous

          How the frick are there different hobbits lol

          • 4 months ago
            Anonymous

            The same way there are different Men. You have Rohan, Gondor, the Haradim, etc. Similarly, you have different hobbits, the Harfoots, the Stoors and the Fallohides. The Hobbits you know from LotR are all Harfoots, Smeagol was a Stoor.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      So fricking gay but I still laughed

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >:-

  10. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Alot of people are gay.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      Far more are not.

      • 4 months ago
        Anonymous

        Facts.

  11. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >should be banned everywhere
    I'll make sure to remind my friends to watch the original trilogy again.

  12. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Tolkien stole rings from his fallen comrades during WWI. This inspired him to write Lord of the Rings.

  13. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Gandalf is gay
    >Aragorn kissed a Hobbit on set
    >One Hobbit kissed 5 dudes from the cast
    >Legolas kissed Aragorn during an interview

    They are all gay

  14. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    All the LOTR movies are cringe as frick. They ruined it for me before it ever came out, bragging about all their camera tricks and how they made elijah wood look small with perspective. After that I couldn't watch the movies because all I can see is camera tricks and green screen. Takes you right out of the immersion.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >reads behind the scenes of a movie
      >is mad when he finds out movies aren't real

  15. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    sweet a LOTR thread, heres a few memes.

  16. 4 months ago
    Anonymous
  17. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    LOTR pioneered the 2 weeks meme.

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Total Recall

    • 4 months ago
      Anonymous

      My favourite isengard scene is still the parts where they show the industry of the orcs and the uruk hai coming out of slime sacs in the mud. I know its an invention but it seems appropriately nasty.

  18. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Same with all the sci-fi crap.

  19. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Only italians and the spanish actually like Lord Of The Rings

  20. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    I hope the end pierogi you eat gives you worms.

  21. 4 months ago
    Anonymous

    Op trying to ruin one of the only decent epic adventures.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *