Sex and Gender

The distinction between sex and gender boils down to this:
sex is biology, and gender is culture.

This distinction holds value when examining different human societies, as we do in anthropology, but in practical terms sex and gender are synonymous.

Proponents of gender ideology insist that this distinction means a person from one sex should be able to assume the gender of the opposite sex. The rest of their misrepresented facts and labyrinthine logic are used solely to shore up this main assertion.

However, gender being the cultural expression of sex in no way justifies people moving between the two categories. The crux of gender within a culture is still sex, regardless of the various arbitrary cultural aspects associated with gender. Sex is an objective biological reality, and gender both describes and is defined by sex. The two are intrinsically linked.

To be a man one must first be male.
To be a woman one must first be female.

Gender didn't spring into existence out of nowhere, it evolved with us sociologically. It's a part of our cultural heritage that tells the story of the most fundamental aspect of our nature: the two sexually dimorphic forms that comprise our species.

Terry Davis: They Glow, You Shine Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Terry Davis: They Glow, You Shine Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You're overcomplicating it. Their basic argument is that, for instance, a male can have personality traits and a self-concept matching the archetype of a woman for his culture, therefore it is reasonable to regard him as a woman if he so desires. What's your counter?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I would say he's free to play out whatever fantasy he would like on his own time but to leave us out of it.

      A man with feminine traits is a feminine man, not a woman.

      Gender describes sex, they are bound. Gender is innate and immutable.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >I would say he's free to play out whatever fantasy he would like on his own time but to leave us out of it.
        And I concur but it doesn't refute anything.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          How so? I say the man can live whatever fantasy he likes but it isn't true. He can be and feel feminine but never be a female.

          The archetype of woman belongs to females, it's theirs to shape, it doesn't fit on a man.

          There's no advantage to be had from divorcing sex and gender, we lose yet more of ourselves by doing so.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The archetype of woman belongs to females, it's theirs to shape, it doesn't fit on a man.
            You can keep asserting this but it doesn't refute anything.

            >There's no advantage to be had from divorcing sex and gender, we lose yet more of ourselves by doing so.
            The "reasonable" variant of their argument, which I laid out for you, doesn't imply "divorcing" the two. The latter is still fundamentally derived from the former and this association isn't being denied.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The thing is, you keep making unsubstantiated claims that make no sense in reality, and you'll continue to believe in a lie. Men literally can not be women, nor vice versa. Maybe one day in the future when transhumanism comes you could do that. Idk why you'd want to, and not just be happy being male whatever you look like. Which is better than actually rejecting reality to cope with unrelated things that are now considered to be "Gender Dysphoria" in the DSM5. Which is funny there is literally medicine that they can give people to help with their "gender" delusions, but that would mean a loss of profit from forever patients. (those needing "gender affirming care") If all you can say to any of that and others have said is "I concur" or "I disagree" without actually making a counter point it kinda shows where you are intellectually, you need to think more outside the box, literally put your head outside the gender spectrum box.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ok, troony.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What does that even mean? Did you even read what I said? Do trannies now call others trannies to empower themselves and not make themselves feel bad? If you read anything I said it's obvious I don't like trans bullshit.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Biology causes the socially constructed. You cannot have the gender that does not correspond with your biology. No matter what gender behaviors you exhibit they are always a subset of biological sex.

            You're a gay little ankle-biter. A woman isn't an archetype, and fricking traps is gay. Cope harder.

            Three trannies on suicide watch.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You are just a homosexual and no one has to play out your fetish if they choose not to.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            How can you use troony as an insult when it's obvious you believe in gender ideology? I guess it's OK if you say it because that's now yalls word right and you get to use it as empowering

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's obvious that you're a hair's breadth away from trooning out and you're desperately overcompensating.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'd kick your ass if I met you IRL, btw. And I'm sure due to all the estrogen your bones are probably frail and you'll bruise easily. Shut up troon.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Post jaw and biceps, troon.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I love how the solution to us trans people being "forever patients" is to lock us up into sanatories like in the old times or give us antipsychotics/drug us into zombies.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They already do this to people to troon them out. The reality is the exact opposite of what you are implying, and that is actually happening here in the states. Also I didn't say that was the solution, and I don't believe it to be. Sounds like if anything, it is the most logical solution in your eyes if you don't "affirm" people then the only other logical course is like 1800's style asylum and lobotomization. Is that not a huge reach and or straw-man or is that your actual belief on how to solve trans people? Being one yourself?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >They already do this to people to troon them out.
            Not me at least lol
            >is that your actual belief
            I have seen both "solutions" being tauted here. Honestly I'm perfectly happy to live as a man on estrogen and I'm not sure why other trannies aren't, I would prefer to be lobotomized if I couldn't be on estrogen though.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            sounds good

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Now that I think of it, free lodging, food and mind-bending drugs sounds pretty great, lock me up please

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            My solution would be to end them at inception so that doesn't sound like the worst case for you.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Suicide by claiming you're a troony? What if it's a minor?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Oops? There's no saving them as is...maybe once the fear is deeply instilled enough it can be repressed beyond recognition.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Minors can't be trans by definition.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            But they can claim they are trans, so should they be killed too?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If someone claims to be something it doesn't make it so. If I called you a tree does that make you one or do you have to declare you're a tree? Children are groomed into being trans they wouldn't even be thinking about that deep sexual connotation if it weren't for grooming content and weirdos. Tell me are kids born with the concept and the word trans in their brains, or do they get taught that in school generally? And no I don't think anyone is seriously saying murder trans people. Your community is not at risk of "genocide" however much people claim it to be so. Say a lie enough times and it'll become true in people's eyes. I see exactly that happening here and worldwide.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It was a discussion of what could be done, I was just referring to what

            My solution would be to end them at inception so that doesn't sound like the worst case for you.

            said, but thank you for your rant. I don't believe in trans genocide either.
            Also I've wanted to be a girl since age 5 and found out about trans things at age 16, I don't really buy "they're all groomed".

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You were born in a culture that endorses this madness. 100 years ago and you'd just be a gay hairdresser, not take HRT and chop off your dick.

            You'd come to realize the futility of your desire, and move on.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I haven't had any surgery and don't live as openly trans. Estrogen feels inherently good though.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You can keep asserting this but it doesn't refute anything.

            What are you looking for then?

            Everything that comprises the notion of "woman" was derived from the fairer sex, their behaviour, their wants, their needs. Women are distinct entities from men, their life path is distinct. Females move throughout our society in a role shaped for them. Females own womanhood.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Everything that comprises the notion of "woman" was derived from the fairer sex, their behaviour, their wants, their needs.
            Right. But that just ends up making a notion of what a female "is like". If that's the gist of what people think of when they say "woman", it's not that much of a stretch to argue that if a male "is like" that, he could be considered a woman.

            > Women are distinct entities from men, their life path is distinct. Females move throughout our society in a role shaped for them.
            NOW you're getting somewhere. So tell me, what is the distinct path for women under the angloid capitaloon system? What is their distinct role in angloid capitaloon society?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            "Angloid Capaloon"

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It is too much of a stretch, yes. The objective reality is that the man is male, and as such "man" describes him and he describes "man."

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You just keep repeating your assertion. Looks like a concession to me.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I think the best thing we can do is just ignore these types of people, you can't argue with idiot troons. All these people want is attention, and it's better we don't give that to them because that's really sad and degenerate that they care that much about wasting people's time.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Post jaw and biceps. You won't because you're a troon waiting to happen.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You'd probably just flick your axe wound to it you seem very adamant on seeing pics of a dude. How about you post your face so we can laugh at it?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Trannies like you are always desperate for any kind of attention, but I'm just gonna add your ID to the filter now. You will demonstrate your craving for my manly presence and your intense homosexual urges by replying to me again.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            My assertion is that objective reality is objective reality, I don't know what else to tell you. What more do you want? Truth matters.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You just keep asserting and reasserting an opinion over and over, but what's really telling is the way you ignored this part:
            >NOW you're getting somewhere. So tell me, what is the distinct path for women under the angloid capitaloon system? What is their distinct role in angloid capitaloon society?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It isn't an opinion, it's objective reality. What part do you contend with?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Notice how once again you avoid addressing this:
            >NOW you're getting somewhere. So tell me, what is the distinct path for women under the angloid capitaloon system? What is their distinct role in angloid capitaloon society?
            That's ok, though. The more you ignore it, the more you demonstrate my point. Your un-society doesn't offer any solid basis to dismiss the people who defend troonery. Being a "woman" under the anglo capitaloon system doesn't really mean anything beyond displaying surface-level traits that your feminized men come to embody more and more with every passing year. In the past, the notion of a male woman would have been immediately self-refuting for the simple fact that a male does not spend his life bearing and nurturing children. Your females no longer have any distinct biological roles to fulfill. They are generic worker drones and consoomers just like the males. You can try to argue that a male with all the outward traits of a typical Western female just isn't a "real" woman in principle, but your objection rings hollow for the simple reason that your system has already long rejected the notion of "real". You've come to accept fake substitutes for nearly anything. The idea of things having some kind of innate essence beyond function and appearance is ridiculed and derided by most subjects of Western liberalism in most contexts. You really have nothing more going for you than pseudointellectualism and petty pedantry. Your arguments convince no one. Be thankful that your leftists are so apt at taking their own propositions to the most absurd extremes and alienating everyone.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Notice how once again you avoid addressing this:
            >NOW you're getting somewhere. So tell me, what is the distinct path for women under the angloid capitaloon system? What is their distinct role in angloid capitaloon society?
            That's ok, though. The more you ignore it, the more you demonstrate my point. Your un-society doesn't offer any solid basis to dismiss the people who defend troonery. Being a "woman" under the anglo capitaloon system doesn't really mean anything beyond displaying surface-level traits that your feminized men come to embody more and more with every passing year. In the past, the notion of a male woman would have been immediately self-refuting for the simple fact that a male does not spend his life bearing and nurturing children. Your females no longer have any distinct biological roles to fulfill. They are generic worker drones and consoomers just like the males. You can try to argue that a male with all the outward traits of a typical Western female just isn't a "real" woman in principle, but your objection rings hollow for the simple reason that your system has already long rejected the notion of "real". You've come to accept fake substitutes for nearly anything. The idea of things having some kind of innate essence beyond function and appearance is ridiculed and derided by most subjects of Western liberalism in most contexts. You really have nothing more going for you than pseudointellectualism and petty pedantry. Your arguments convince no one. Be thankful that your leftists are so apt at taking their own propositions to the most absurd extremes and alienating everyone.

            And by the way, this whole fantasy about women having these super-distinct behaviors and needs and desires, these exaggerated gender behaviors and traits -- it's mostly cultural and artificial. The troons are right about it. Your society is now conditioning males to be that way the same way it conditioned females to. In natural hunter-gatherer societies the differences between males and females are far less pronounced and indeed revolve primarily around the role of motherhood.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No, men and women are distinct with distinct needs and behaviours and this distinction is biological, not cultural.

            Consider the vastly different reproductive costs associated with the two sexes. A male can conceivably reproduce in a one-and-done interaction with a female, where a female must invest time and energy to gestate her offspring, putting herself at a physical disadvantage while doing so. This single mechanic reveals the vastly different selective pressures that exist between men and women.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I accept your full and direct concession of all my points, anglo troony.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You're not very good at this.

            >israelite sophistry
            gradually I began to hate them

            Reading is hard.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You're not very good at this.
            I destroyed you hard enough that your only resort now is to keep repeatedly pretending you didn't see it while spouting fully generic, regurgitated incelwiki talking points.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not interested in your anglo hate boner, I'm ignoring your side-tangent because it has nothing to do with the topic.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You can remove the word "anglo" completely and the point still stands completely undisputed.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >What is their distinct role in angloid capitaloon society?

            They produce large gametes.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >doesn't refute anything
          You think you are smarter than you are. There is nothing presented to refute. You said:
          >it is reasonable to regard him as a woman if he so desires
          The other guy said:
          >leave us out of it
          So you are either moronic or you are attempting to distract from the real meat of the issue here, which is that you/trannies want to compel others to indulge these fantasies, enforced by the violence of the state. That stance is obviously malicious, and seemingly downright evil. So which are you? Stupid or evil?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ok, troon. Thanks for your worthless input.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Marvelous hallucination you got there. I will happily accept this victory. YWNBAW

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >seething troon can't stop (You)ing me

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Anyone who unironically uses the word gender as a "personality/feeling" is a israelite, this is a bait thread

    • 4 weeks ago
      sage

      >What's your counter?
      you're a stupid homosexual

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Biology causes the socially constructed. You cannot have the gender that does not correspond with your biology. No matter what gender behaviors you exhibit they are always a subset of biological sex.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >What's your counter?
      A biological male who looks and acts like a stereotypical woman isn't a woman, he is just a feminine man.
      Especially when he fails miserably at it and doesn't look or act like a real woman at all.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >he is just a feminine man.
        *effeminate man

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's crazy that 80% of them have the same fat bloated face. Nobody points this out but a great deal of these things have the exact same face shape.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          "Estrogen has no side effects, you can't overdose on the chemicals women naturally produce in a balanced amount."

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Oh look it’s the aggressive gypsy who always ask anons to explain themselves. Didn’t realise you’d branched out from programming to anthropology.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Not an argument. See

        Notice how once again you avoid addressing this:
        >NOW you're getting somewhere. So tell me, what is the distinct path for women under the angloid capitaloon system? What is their distinct role in angloid capitaloon society?
        That's ok, though. The more you ignore it, the more you demonstrate my point. Your un-society doesn't offer any solid basis to dismiss the people who defend troonery. Being a "woman" under the anglo capitaloon system doesn't really mean anything beyond displaying surface-level traits that your feminized men come to embody more and more with every passing year. In the past, the notion of a male woman would have been immediately self-refuting for the simple fact that a male does not spend his life bearing and nurturing children. Your females no longer have any distinct biological roles to fulfill. They are generic worker drones and consoomers just like the males. You can try to argue that a male with all the outward traits of a typical Western female just isn't a "real" woman in principle, but your objection rings hollow for the simple reason that your system has already long rejected the notion of "real". You've come to accept fake substitutes for nearly anything. The idea of things having some kind of innate essence beyond function and appearance is ridiculed and derided by most subjects of Western liberalism in most contexts. You really have nothing more going for you than pseudointellectualism and petty pedantry. Your arguments convince no one. Be thankful that your leftists are so apt at taking their own propositions to the most absurd extremes and alienating everyone.

        for the definitive bottom line on this subject.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >What's your counter?
      it's a lie, his masculine traits will always be masculine. he will have no chance of having any experience in life akin to a woman because he wasn't born in a body that would allow him to do so. either edit their genitals during conception or call them what they are. mentally ill.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      so you're saying that transvestites are delusional perverts?
      ok

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      mentally ill

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You're clearly another seething troon in need of attention.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          diversion cope and seethe potatotrans

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >t. troon overwhelmed with homosexual urges
            ID goes to the filter.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Negative, friend. Either sex that eschews their culturally sanctioned gender roles falls into the third sex: "le castrat".
      Otherwise, I think that you've done a decent job of exploring this topic.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It is generally true that days are warmer than nights, though this differs from place to place. Some nights are warmer than other days. But temperature is a secondary characteristic of the time of day. Day and night are defined by the presence of sun, regardless of the temperature.

      It is reasonable to regard a picture on a screen of an apple as being an apple, for the purposes of illustrating an apple, but a picture of an apple on a screen is not an apple even if you regard it as one for some purpose or by mistake.

      There isn't much to counter here because you're not even trying to say a man becomes a woman, you're just saying a person could pretending a man becomes a woman if he wanted to. You've couched your argument so much it's basically already a tacit admission a man can't actually become a woman so what is left to counter?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      471601569

      I've given them the you they earned which you denied

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    471601466
    imagine replying to a low effort copy pasta

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ok, reddit.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    gender doesnt exist, only Biological sex
    if you are male, you are a man
    if you are female, you are a woman

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No.
      If you are male, you can become a man.
      If you are female, you can become a woman.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >pedolinguistic ramblings
      People don't have genders. Grammar does.
      People have sex (except OP).

      >hivebots can't distinguish between biology and archetype

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >he thinks woman is an archetype

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >gender doesnt exist
      It does.
      But only in some languages and only pertaining to words, like in French or Spanish where a table is feminin.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        yeah but linguistic gender is something else than thinking you are of a different sex than you actually are

        [...]
        >hivebots can't distinguish between biology and archetype

        there is no such thing as an archetype, you are either a man or a woman (the word you are looking for is personality)

        No.
        If you are male, you can become a man.
        If you are female, you can become a woman.

        obviously, man is an adult boy, but both boys and men are male

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Exactly. All men are male, not all males are men (yet*).
          *Arguably, a eunuch is a male, but not a man. But since we don't have rites of passage to become men anymore, this distinction is rather pointless until we once again do.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >he thinks woman is an archetype

          >being utterly incapable of abstract thought

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            what abstract thought lol?
            You can never "feel" like the opposite sex, because you have NEVER been the opposite sex, so all these gender distinctions are BS. Only Biology matters. If you "feel" as something else, you are mentally ill

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >what abstract thought
            The kind that allows sentient beings to understands concepts like archetypes instead of unironically shitting out a reply like "there is no such thing as archetypes".

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You can never "feel" like the opposite sex
            Exactly. No frame of reference can exists for this claim to be valid because no comparison between being a man and being a woman can ever be made since we all only have one experience.

            These claims are based on stereotypes, rooted firmly in the socially constructed gender roles they claim to subvert.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >These claims are based on stereotypes
            Yes, you dimwit. That's exactly what they are based on, because that's exactly what the concept of a woman is based on.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's interesting how "Gender is a social construct" which is a term that gets parroted all the time, and that phrase and understanding is social construct in of itself. Things are really inverted and backwards.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Not only there's no frame of reference for feeling like the other sex or gender, but there's also not a frame of reference for feeling like your own sex or gender.

            I do not feel like a man, like I may feel a pain in my stomach, or a gust of wind, or that the stove is making my hand warm. I just am a man. I'm a man even when I'm not experiencing any feelings, for instance, when I'm asleep. If being a man (masculine sex) demanded a conscious self-affirmation, I would then cease to be a man while not conscious to reafirm my manliness.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, "feeling" like any gender at all seems to be some kind of obsessive compulsion rooted in dissatisfaction with yourself, pining for some characteristic you don't possess. I simply am, I don't "feel" like anything but myself.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Yes, "feeling" like any gender at all seems to be some kind of obsessive compulsion rooted in dissatisfaction with yourself
            It has to be this. Noticed how from the pressuposition of being able to "feel" like something else and thus being something else, we've went from merely another kind of human (man/woman) to new types of human (agender, demigender, whatever) to...feeling like animals (otherkin morons)? And there's no limit to this once you've opened that Pandora's box.

            The only way out is to reject the premise that one can feel like some other thing different than what one is. He may exercise a mental capacity (empathy) to imagine how it would feel, but he can't actually feel anything of the sort. We can only experience the world as ourselves, and thus feel as ourselves, as "feeling" is a part of this experience.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You're a gay little ankle-biter. A woman isn't an archetype, and fricking traps is gay. Cope harder.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        wiener is feminine
        and c**t is masculine in spiccish.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >if you are male, you're a man
      Untrue. Black folk are quite pointedly not men. They are adult boys.
      Or male animals. Bulls? wieners, maybe? But not men. That is a term reserved for males who are at the very least, self sufficient and acting on a higher principle than muhdick
      This means transwomen are not women. They are not men. They are male.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I happen to be a male woman, bigot. I’m more feminine and prettier than cis women and have a husband who doesn’t even know

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >pedolinguistic ramblings
    People don't have genders. Grammar does.
    People have sex (except OP).

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You're getting drafted whether or not you have cut your dick off homosexual.
    Government doesn't care about your commie-speak when they need bodies in the fields.
    Trannies will be the first ones drafted to die in WW3.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sex is science.
    Gender is religion.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    sage

    only sexes exist
    gender is made up israeli nonsense
    didnt read any of your post btw eat shit homosexual

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's ok, this post is for people with reading comprehension and at least some understanding of this topic.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you have understanding of this israeli nuspeak? cool flex, about as worthless as your feminist arts degree

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, I want to destroy it. The first step is learning what they think so you know how to tell them they're wrong.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            then you're just playing along with their delusions you moron

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Not at all. Calling them dumb and walking away isn't going to solve anything, you need to take their hand and show them exactly how dumb they are.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Taking asinine, redundant concepts at face value doesn't indicate comprehension of any kind. You and the Moldovian larper mistake navel gazing for practical intelligence, then you wonder why your field is filled with maladjusted morons with no grasp on reality.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Do familiarize yourself with the objective truth about your troonogenic society:

          Notice how once again you avoid addressing this:
          >NOW you're getting somewhere. So tell me, what is the distinct path for women under the angloid capitaloon system? What is their distinct role in angloid capitaloon society?
          That's ok, though. The more you ignore it, the more you demonstrate my point. Your un-society doesn't offer any solid basis to dismiss the people who defend troonery. Being a "woman" under the anglo capitaloon system doesn't really mean anything beyond displaying surface-level traits that your feminized men come to embody more and more with every passing year. In the past, the notion of a male woman would have been immediately self-refuting for the simple fact that a male does not spend his life bearing and nurturing children. Your females no longer have any distinct biological roles to fulfill. They are generic worker drones and consoomers just like the males. You can try to argue that a male with all the outward traits of a typical Western female just isn't a "real" woman in principle, but your objection rings hollow for the simple reason that your system has already long rejected the notion of "real". You've come to accept fake substitutes for nearly anything. The idea of things having some kind of innate essence beyond function and appearance is ridiculed and derided by most subjects of Western liberalism in most contexts. You really have nothing more going for you than pseudointellectualism and petty pedantry. Your arguments convince no one. Be thankful that your leftists are so apt at taking their own propositions to the most absurd extremes and alienating everyone.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >socially constructed roles
    All of gender theory is written by autistic virgins who make it past college without realizing that women are turned off by effeminate men

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Don't care. I'm never gonna respect your bullshit ideology, troony. And as an individual you'll never gain my respect. Eat shit and dilate, freak.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The prophecies are their plans.

    Stop the Russia-Ukraine war. This conflict, along with others currently happening, is supposed to lead to Armageddon, where both sides destroy each other. Meanwhile, Zuckerberg is in the bunker he's currently constructing, which he envisions as a new 'Noah's ark'. They plan to emerge from their bunkers once the world has undergone full genocide, intending to inherit a world shaped by technology developed by the 'goyim', including AI.

    Extermination of Americans:
    https://x.com/Know_More_News/status/1624214859218034688

    Extermination of Europeans:
    https://x.com/Know_More_News/status/1625266003558150144

    Judaism wants to do all of this. They will sacrifice even Israel.

    ?si=uKrzxXaJM_dKVGVU&t=718

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >AKSHULLY these two things mean something different
    not they dont

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >gender
    they've re-defined this word, it has nothing to do with people. gender has always been a grammar concept. the gender of "lion" is male, the gender of "lioness" is female. the sex of a person is either male or female.

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Gender is an expression of biology. A tree without roots is not a tree

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    gender only exists for the purposes of gramar. There are 3 genders: male, female and neuter. That is it. If you want to be a neuter you must be de-gonaded the end.

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Today in /misc/'s mandatory troon bait thread Moldovian has a hissy fit after rightfully being called a moron

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Gender is caused by biological sex and there is no part of it that is arbitrary.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There are probably some things that are arbitrary. Blue and pink, that sort of thing.

      I'm sure a lot that seems arbitrary isn't though, take dresses and long hair:

      I suspect long hair is rooted in females carrying infants on their backs, possibly with braided hair. Infants have a strong gripping instinct and other primates carry their young on their back.

      Dresses make more sense for a woman over pants, given the female reproductive system and sanitary concerns.

      We'll likely never know exactly how everything fits together, but it seems clear that gender concepts are evolved external phenotypes and not truly arbitrary.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There is nothing in existence that is arbitrary. Everything happened for some reason like dominos falling striking each other. Its the reason people argue against free will. You are only the result of what shaped you. Some stuff may have been decided but even then it was decided that because of some reason. Even if its as pointless as someone felt like it. But it happened for a reason a series of cause and effect that starts at biology. Some part of gender are useless like an organ that used to have a purpose but no longer does. Some parts are a distinction without a meaning but that does not matter. Everything happened from some chain of cause and effect beginning with biology. Male and female large and small gametes. Absolutely nothing in the whole of existence is arbitrary.

        Every piece of gender was caused because humans live in a world of distinct sexual binary. There is no escaping it and they are bullshiting you when they pretend otherwise.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Truth.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Short hair was because it got in the way of work, whereas for females this didn't matter so much and it could be braided back anyway. For men just being pretty wasn't worth it so a lot of them cut it short, for females being pretty has always been extremely valuable. This is the same reason most men have short hair today, it's not a fashion one. It's because females value pretty things like that more.

        Everyone originally wore "skirts" or "dresses", pretty much tunic-looking things with open bottoms. They were simpler to manufacture and maintain, and there are still some old cultures that wear that same kind of clothing. Trousers / pants came about from nomadic tribes who rode horses, it offered protection on a horse. Eventually men altogether started wearing them as they became more widespread. It was barbaric for a woman to wear a man's clothes, and especially clothes some horseback barbarian would wear.

        There is nothing in existence that is arbitrary. Everything happened for some reason like dominos falling striking each other. Its the reason people argue against free will. You are only the result of what shaped you. Some stuff may have been decided but even then it was decided that because of some reason. Even if its as pointless as someone felt like it. But it happened for a reason a series of cause and effect that starts at biology. Some part of gender are useless like an organ that used to have a purpose but no longer does. Some parts are a distinction without a meaning but that does not matter. Everything happened from some chain of cause and effect beginning with biology. Male and female large and small gametes. Absolutely nothing in the whole of existence is arbitrary.

        Every piece of gender was caused because humans live in a world of distinct sexual binary. There is no escaping it and they are bullshiting you when they pretend otherwise.

        Yeah, pretty much. I mean, those things like "dresses and long hair" weren't arbitrary AT ALL but 99% of people have no idea of why they came about. We can't trust these people to understand why things need to be done or why they were done in the past, and they're normalBlack folk anyway so they'll just go along with whatever groupthink tells them.

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    no, homosexual, you are wrong.

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    New Zealanders would pronounce that as
    Six and jindah

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just stop using the word gender, it's not a real thing.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Are concepts real or not? Heavy philosophical discussion we're getting into here.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Hes right they are trying to define a part of sex into existence that fly's in the face of reality. Gender is bullshit. Every part of sex is caused by biology.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It is philosophical but it's not like actually high thought we're having here. When you break down the meanings of words and concepts it does get philosophical but you also have to try to follow logic. If you can claim to be a woman why can I not be a black man and everyone has to socially consider me that? Oh but it doesn't work THAT way, you see what I mean?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You're free to be a wigger if you want to, just like I can be a trans woman.

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you want to grow your hair long and put on makeup and wear a dress, fine, no one really gives a shit what you do with your own life.
    But you aren't a real woman and you never will be a real woman.
    Here's the reality. If any of you trannies actually passed for women, then you wouldn't have to insist on all of this stuff. If you successfully passed, then everyone would naturally think that you were a real woman and would call you she/her and all of that stuff.
    The cold, hard Truth is that you aren't a real woman, you will never be a real woman, and you don't even pass as a fake woman.

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    God I hate the American culture so much it's unreal. Literally every aspect of day to day life is fricked beyond belief. There's simply no other country on the face of this planet that is more moronic than the US.

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Gender is not real. What you are really seeing is human entropy. The path back to monkey.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This.
      Except baboons don't have trannies though.

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Look at animals if it’s so fricking hard to grasp. Stop wasting people time on israelite bullshit!

  25. 4 weeks ago
    sage

    Kys, ywnbaw

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The distinction is arbitrary nonsense made up leftist social engineers to replace personality with identity, making the most important thing about you what you are and not who you are.
    It's an insidious conspiracy to force people into group collectives that can be easily controlled by pitting them against each other.
    Anyone who indulges this nonsense is either being manipulated or seeking to manipulate others

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Two.
    That is all.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And this is why a homosexual told me once the Bible is propaganda and that's all.

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Thats like saying that tallness and measurements are different, and so you can identify as 6’3. You will never be a white man (it auto corrected a typo of woman to white man, so I will leave it)

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >The distinction between sex and gender boils down to this:

    >sex is real, gender is made up gaslighting bullshit that isn't real

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Gender is a social construct that doesn't even exist.

  31. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >The distinction between sex and gender
    There is none, never has been and never will be. Stop trying to change the meaning of words to suit your delusional homosexual fantasies and just have a nice day instead.

  32. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >The distinction between sex and gender boils down to this:

  33. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sex is everything, gender is imaginary. You will die as you were born, no amount of hormones or mutilation will change this.

  34. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Look at they venn diagrams, these things are barely touching.
    When they're literally covering the same area, one of top of the other.
    This is what you call a gaslighting c**t!

  35. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >sex
    >biological qualities

  36. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    gay

  37. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Culture is dumb and gay and ultra dumbgay. We should treat culture and society like religion: respect people who take it seriously, try to use it as a window to transcendental truth, but don't take any of it literally.
    >hurr it's a cultural thing so it's real
    ^words uttered by only the truly moronic

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Flags are just pieces of cloth. Language is just an arbitrary set of rules on how to communicate. Ancestors are dead and gone and old people will soon be gone lol

  38. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >culture
    means mental illness

  39. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fixed that image.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >phylosophical bullshit
      Nah, it's subversive israeli pilpul, you're giving it too much credit.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There's nothing philosophical about gender ideology.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nope.

      Sex/gender should be the left green circle. The right circle is a different word, perhaps "mode", "expression" etc.

      The "gen" in gender means "to birth", gender is reproductive function.

  40. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The just want reasons to gaslight everyone and so they make them up.
    They could have chosen any of these words and added their own definitions to them.
    >sex
    >gender
    >genre
    >kind
    >type
    >sort
    >version

  41. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    no, they're synonyms and mean the same thing. your homosexual pedo hero money made it different and you homosexuals chose to go with it to pervert society.

  42. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >israelite sophistry
    gradually I began to hate them

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Canaan and Shem.

  43. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sex and gender
    The same thing

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >in practical terms sex and gender are synonymous

      Literally the second sentence.

  44. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >sex is scientific, and gender is judaic.
    FTFY

  45. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Masculinity and feminity are objective reality not some social construct.

  46. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I just used gender instead of sex because it sounded like fricking. Pretty sure a lot of people did the same and now the Black person left manipulated the word to mean what it is now.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nah, gender in this context is an academic abstraction that's useful for analyzing human societies. It's like an extended phenotype.

      For all intents and purposes sex and gender are the same thing, though.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The usual example of the distinction is in social roles. It's not inherently female to wear a certain kind of clothing, but inside a specific culture, it's a social norm to use that clothing. That comes from the biological, but since it's not equal in all cultures, it has to be something distinct.
        The slippery slope is when you go from "cultures have different gender norms" to "gender norms are not necessarily tied to one's biological sex".

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, exactly. The crux of gender is still sex.

          Gender and sex are different the way a hand is different than an arm or a foot is different than a leg. Saying gender is not tied to its respective sex is like saying a foot can become a hand.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I like the roots and tree analogy more, as gender (I don't like this word, if it's the social/cultural aspect of a sex it shouldn't be what is basically greek for sexual origin, but I digress) comes from sex when it's allowed to grow within a certain culture. If it's cut short (like if you were to experiment with humans in total isolation), then gender would not emerge as there's no cultural aspects added to the biological, it's just the raw biological presentation of that sex. Arns and hands and legs and feet don't seem to fit as well as the root opposed to the grown thing.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            we use phylum when it comes to division of a category, in this case male and femals, genos can also be used but in a more specific context.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            But these tie it even more to the biological. It IS biological, but it's the biological under the influence of the cultural.
            I'd call it persona.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            there are physiological (in the literal sense of the word, as in rational and logical as per the nature or physis of the being) cultures and paraphysin ones, if the biological is under the influence of an ill culture then the cultivation will fail.

  47. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >sex: demonstrable, measurable, discovered by scientific method and observation of the natural world
    >gender: arbitrary, subjective, invented by a pedophile roleplaying as a scientist that drove a kid to suicide

  48. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sounds like gender is made up and the government has no right to psyop young people into using israeli therapists that will give you a mental illness.

  49. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I like flowers and hello kitty shit due to my daughter. That doesnt make me a homosexual like you, homosexual. I am a man, I plough my wife daily, Robocop is my favorite movie and I will fricking murder you if I ever see you one day. Frick you homosexual.

  50. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    there is no distinction between sex and gender to normal people.
    theres only made up imaginary ones by homosexuals

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's homosexuals and anthropologists, thank you very much. And I suppose psychiatrists too in this wayward era.

  51. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you're mentally ill

  52. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    gender doesn't exist, you are either male or female and I don't give a shit what holes you like to fill with dick

  53. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Gender derives from Greek and there are no lies there, it's your birth (genesis) genetic state according to your genome and genes, all sharing the same root, as long of course you choose to go with that etymology.

  54. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sex is what people are physically and gender is how they're treated in society. Passing trannies exist, and they're not treated as men, hence gender is a thing, a concept that exists in real life.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Passing trannies exist
      not really
      >b-but ladyboys can-
      and they are treated as prostitutes, at best. I'd say it's pretty insulting to insinuate that normal women should be treated like they're prostitutes

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >not really
        Load-bearing cope

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You're never going to pass. People will just pretend you do.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't pass and don't try, I live as a normal man on estrogen, but it's silly to pretend like it's impossible.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >normal men on estrogen
            Bro that's anything but normal.
            Even the most passing trannies look uncanny.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Even the most passing trannies look uncanny
            Cope, how would you know?
            I'm indistinguishable from a normal man, I just like being on estrogen.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >how would you know?
            >I'm indistinguishable from a normal man
            >even though I am on estrogen
            yeah it's a real mystery how people can clock a troony at like 200 yards

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Estrogen isn't magic but it's dumb to pretend that it's impossible for someone who started in their teens / early 20's to pass as a woman, especially if they had facial surgery.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            and shoulder surgery
            and hip surgery
            and hand surgery
            and feet surgery
            and this surgery
            and that surgery
            you are a grotesque embarrassment
            you will never be a woman

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            high chance that idiot is from helsinki as that place is full of weirdest shitters anyway.
            >https://hel-looks.com/

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Even the most passing trannies look uncanny
            Cope, how would you know?
            I'm indistinguishable from a normal man, I just like being on estrogen.

            https://hel-looks.com/20240529_06/
            I could NEVER tell this is a man. R-right?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >1 nonpassing troony means that trannies can't pass

            and shoulder surgery
            and hip surgery
            and hand surgery
            and feet surgery
            and this surgery
            and that surgery
            you are a grotesque embarrassment
            you will never be a woman

            I know this is /misc/, but could you at least read more than 1 post before replying to a thread/series of posts?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            you don't pass
            they don't pass
            the end

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Cope & seethe

  55. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Except the two sets practically overlap completely

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thank you for your contribution! Not that you care, but this has been posted tens of times in this thread. I'm always reminded why this is the lowest IQ board.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Remind me how many sex chromosomes are there?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Please refer to my previous posts regarding my views on sex and gender!

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            you're a lunatic and danger to children you should be put in the bog

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Read
            my
            posts

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You didn't answer my question. How many are there? I can count only 2.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You didn't read my posts because if you had, you'd know that I agree with you!

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I believe in genetic determinism which is more grounded in science than your "gender isn't sex" bullshit. You may cut off your genitals but every single one of your cells says you're the sex and gender you were born as.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why is science only cool when you can pretend to own the trannies with it, without reading any of their previous posts?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why would you identify as a man but take female hormones? Don't you see the problem in that? This world isn't ready for transhumanism.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Because the effects of female hormones are nice.
            Softer and squishier skin is nice.
            Body hair growing back slower is nice.
            Having B-cup breasts is nice.
            Having a wider spectrum of emotions is nice.
            Not going bald is nice.
            Looking youthful is nice.
            Having no sexual urges is nice.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You forget long term effects.
            So you're not trans? Your gender is male?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Long-term effects are comparable to smoking, I'm fine with them if I can be on estrogen.
            I'm trans I guess, but I don't present as a woman or as trans, but still take hormones.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            So you admit that gender thing is bullshit? It'll all make more sense if you say you're just an effiminate man who takes estrogen.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I think this about gender and sex:

            Sex is what people are physically and gender is how they're treated in society. Passing trannies exist, and they're not treated as men, hence gender is a thing, a concept that exists in real life.

            >It'll all make more sense if you say you're just an effiminate man who takes estrogen.
            I am that, yes.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I disagree with that definition, gender comes more from how one sees himself and how he thinks.
            I have no problem with you, you do you, but as I said this isn't the right time for transhumanism.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >gender comes more from how one sees himself and how he thinks.
            But isn’t that logic a bit baseless? At least for the creation of self-replicating social interactions? What if I came to see myself as an ethnic italian person and claimed to think like an italian, would it be fair for me to expect other people to treat me like that, even though I didn’t grew up on the culture?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Then it becomes a mental illness like gender dysphoria.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Then you have an unique concept of gender, mine is the one that's also on the OP picture.
            >this isn't the right time for transhumanism
            Don't worry, I can keep doing it without anyone knowing.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Gender is synonymous with sex.

            https://archive.org/details/americandictiona01websrich/page/816/mode/1up

            If people could actually change their gender redefining the word wouldnt be necessary.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Because pro-troony side is feelings and philosophical bullshit with shit all long term good quality studies. Meanwhile there are lot of science starting from how long term estrogen use destroys male body. Same thing applies to females using testosterone. So pro side is nothing but psychology and low quality studies and other side is good quality studies and you wonder why its only good when its on other side.

            And honestly i don't give frick how you shit your life up, but you will start to have physical problems eventually. And if you think that you won't have any problems then that is some hard snowflake complex.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >there are lot of science starting from how long term estrogen use destroys male body
            Show me, I know that it has similar effects to smoking.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0021968163900924
            https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/treatment/hormone-therapy/side-effects-men
            https://hillman.upmc.com/cancer-care/medical-oncology/hormone-therapy/side-effects

            and before you go "but those are cancer/ patients of some other disease", yes but that is also reason why there are long term hormone use studies as hormones have been tried as treatment for other diseases before troony boom started and by searching for those studies you can find consistent side effect appearance no matter for what it was tried as treatment for. Bone problems are what i have mostly seen trannies who try to go back whine about.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The first one seems vaguely positive? Besides the water retention and feeling bad about being on estrogen.
            The last two are not about estrogen therapy for men, they are about treatment with antiandrogens which block testosterone, which is used to treat prostate cancer, without added estrogen. The effects of having no sex hormones aren't the effects of being on estrogen as a male.
            >Bone problems are what i have mostly seen trannies who try to go back whine about.
            Any hormone treatment (just like steroids) disrupts your natural hormone treatment, and lack of sex hormones is what typically causes osteoporosis, like in post-menopausal women.
            Any more studies? This is interesting.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Here is one about blood clots https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7341440/
            That one is generic study about extra estrogen effects so its not troony only study but overall effect when taking extra estrogens as female pill contraceptive is basically high dose of estrogen. That is also one route to find hormone effect studies when looking for e-pill studies, but those don't fully translate into troony side as its female body and estrogen combo.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I knew about that, that's what I referred to in

            >there are lot of science starting from how long term estrogen use destroys male body
            Show me, I know that it has similar effects to smoking.

            as "similar effects to smoking". I once autismed enough to look up the exact rates for picrel. VTE is what your link is about and IS is ischemic stroke.
            So similar risks of VTE from my method of taking estrogen (injections, as opposed to pills, like in your link) and similar rates of getting a stroke and of a smoker dying from "excess mortality".

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            And one of biggest challenges with hormone use is mimicking natural rhythm https://www.webmd.com/women/normal-testosterone-and-estrogen-levels-in-women
            >"The amount and levels of hormones change daily. The sex hormones, estrogen and testosterone, are secreted in short bursts -- pulses -- which vary from hour to hour and even minute to minute. Hormone release varies between night and day and from one stage of the menstrual cycle to another."

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Mimicking natural rhythms isn't necessary for optimal feminization from estrogen. Here are my approximate levels from my dose and the median normal woman's cycle.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            And here is the link that the first quote in my pic is from:
            https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37527367/

  56. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There is no debate to be had. You are either a man or a woman at birth. Gender roles have been determined over thousands of years of trial and error. If you don't like your gender role tough tittys no one cares except you. You are not oppressed or a victim your an idiot and need to accept yourself and your limitations.

  57. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bullshit. Sex and gender are synonyms. What you're descrining is behaviour. Anyone can behave in any way, there's nothing stopping you, people have the weirdest and most different motivations to act a certain way.
    If you leave people be they will always behave according to their sex/gender. Except when they have genetic or biological defects.

  58. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that there's not a single scientific evidence for this gender crap LMAO.
    >muh single primitive tribe out of 62347 tribes makes men dress as women
    Okay israelite.

  59. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    0.2% of people are not XX or XY
    Your definitions are not sufficient. If humans aren't just XX and XY, then you are not referring to XX and XY when you say "sex." That's all there is to it.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's 0.018% actually, and they simply suffer from a birth defect.
      Our bodies are "designed" into two sexual dimorphic forms, just how they are "designed" with two legs. A person being born with a missing leg in no way undermines this fact. That's all there is to it.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >0.2% of people are not XX or XY
      Nothing to do with "trans" "gender" brah

  60. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Gender comes from the latin “gen” meaning “to birth”. Gender describes your reproductive function, it is synonymous with sex. It has been used this way since the 1500s. The earliest dictionaries list the words as being synonymous and it is only very recently, begining around 1963, that crossdressers have lobbied for this word to mean something different, to desribe aspects of their personality.

    This is an anathema to the historical and etymological meaning of the word. Put simply, since they cannot actually change their gender, their reproductive function, they instead attempt to change the language to make it seem as if they have. The change of language would not be necessary if changing your gender were actually possible.

    There have always been feminine men and masculine women, just as some days are colder than some nights, and some nights are warmer than some days. Days are generally warm, men are generally masculine, but these are secondary characteristics that do not define your gender or the tike of day.

    A man pretending to be a woman is a pseudo gender. They have not changed their gender and cannot do so. Even calling them transgender is playing into their delusion, their propaganda and their utter homosexualry.

  61. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not reading
    Go with your israelitepsychological shit elsewhere

  62. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    TL/DR
    YOU CANNOT CHANGE YOUR SEX/EVERY troony IS A PEDO

  63. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    But culture is imposed to people by society. No one gets to choose which culture they are a part of. They just are. And all people who are males are assigned the masculine gender role by society. A person will only end up being a troony according to this theory if they are exposed to cultural cues that confuse their identity with the opposite gender.
    It also completely fails to explain how people who live in a society with very strong gender roles and no niche cultures end up identifying with the opposite gender (ex: Iran).
    I think there are some serious doctrinal issues with gender theory. Maybe some people have addressed them but I will realistically never bother to look into the topic.

  64. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sex is fricking.
    Gender is biological XX vs XY.

  65. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  66. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    In polish language there is only a word "płeć" (means gender - male or female), and sex means copulation. Just to let you know all haha.

  67. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    male and female, everything else is a disgusting fetish
    u disgusting israelites

  68. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Daily reminder that most shills on this site are professional Israeli.
    https://pastebin.com/edUqQV1e

    ===[ Current alert ]===
    Sweet Baby Inc. and Department of Defense

    [...]

    [...]

    [...]

    Some guy self-immolated and the israelites keep kvetching:

    [...]

    In a twist of divine humor, israelites became CHUD:

    [...]

    [...]

    =====[ /vault/ ]=====

    1. It's the israelites [ 6 million cookies, Anne Frank ballpoint, holocoaster, Chabad tunnel, Saturn black cube, GoyimTV ]
    2. COVID plandemic | ID2020 [ 1dsghi.pdf, c19ivm, hereistheevidence, SCOTUS DNA patent, Deagle, VAIDS, Bluetooth MAC, Terrain theory, Etymology ]
    3. Pornography is a weapon [ Mindgeek, McGill: MK-ULTRA, CERN: Chapleau, /misc/457656749 ]
    4. Pizzagate [ Pentagram map, John, Riekermann, ComfyGate ]
    5. School shootings are glowop [ Sandyhook laugh ]
    6. Fungus and Parasitepill [ q4agf7.pdf ]
    7. Mememagick [ chaos magic, Egregore ]
    8. Cancer and AIDS have cure
    9. God gene [ VMAT2, Signature in the Cell, spw5nmUrpWA ]
    10. Pharmakeia, Stem cell [ Foreskin in cosmetics, Finkelstein: human DNA in hotdog, HEK293: fetus cells in vaccine and products like Pepsi (tumorigenic) ]
    11. Meat is incredibly important for your diet, avoid seed oil and corn syrup poison [ Dr. Chris Knobbe - Diseases of Civilization ]
    12. Hunter bidens Finger Lakes tattoo [ Silent hill, Oz, Mormon origin, pedo symbol, missing people, military bunkers, anomalies research buoy, Ghislaine Maxwell submersible: tunnel to canada ]
    13. CERN ritual and tunnel ceremony
    14. Encryption | Hardware backdoor [ IntelME, AMD PSP, ARM Trustzone, rsabd.py, NSA SELinux, iOS pegasus ]
    15. Antarctica [ Fitbit leak, Antarctic treaty, Admiral Byrd, 15th century map, /x/32364917 ]
    16. Moon [ Lost footage, 1962 laser beam, Nixon phone call, AMERICAN MOON(2007), lux ]
    17. Psionic [ Gateway, RV, AP, CIA-RDP96, Edward Riordan 2017 ]

  69. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If gender is distinct from sex, as this diagram suggests, then you should be able to describe gender without referencing sex.
    You can easily describe sex without referencing gender.

  70. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the idea that sex and gender are anything but synonyms is israeli pilpul bullshit

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I keep trying to say this. Open the earliest dictionaries and read through every one you can find until very recently and they're listed as synonymous. "Gen" is birth (as in "genesis), "gender" is reproductive function ie sex.

      If people wanted to talk about masculinity/feminity and used a word like mode (as in, style) to describe this spectrum, there'd be no issue. No one denies that some men are more or less feminine than others and vice versa for women. But they had to attach this different concept to an existing terminology because they hate that they can't actually change their gender so they're attempting to change the words instead.

      Even using "gender" by their definitions is giving them too much of a win.

  71. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sex is biology and gender is linguistics

  72. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  73. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I reject the culture, as is my right
    Frick off

  74. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >The distinction between sex and gender
    Does not exist outside the English speaking realm.
    Non English speaking SJWs are losing their minds over this.
    The meaning of sex in German is exclusively for the act. Something the translator is unable to pick up since it doesn't understand stand alone context unlike in the terms below.

  75. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Gender doesn't exist. Much like the pipe of the painting. Only sex.

  76. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    guaranteed homosexual troony israelite Black person posted this, post a pic of yourself

  77. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Guys that pretend to be girls are degenerates.

  78. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    eat shit, leaf.
    >observe primary sexual characteristics: Penis, vegana.
    >observe correlation between primary sexual characteristics, and secondary sexual characteristics: penises mostly enjoy sportsball, veganas mostly like babies.
    >try to reverse correlate secondary characteristics with primary ones.
    >fail to find strong correlation.
    >claim that this means primary sexual characteristics are unimportant.
    if you ignore the vitally important parts, the unimportant parts become the most important parts.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *