There are no standards set for what constitutes success for women now. A man is successful if he makes money.

There are no standards set for what constitutes success for women now.

A man is successful if he makes money.

But a woman is successful if she's pretty - an attribute that's mostly out of her control and declines with age.

This is why women are so miserable.

Additionally, nobody's willing to tell women when they suck at things.
Female friendships don't involve shit talk. They always have to suck up to each other and compliment each other.
It's not in their nature to be brutally honest with each other.

This is why women don't develop skills as well as men, and therefore become miserable.

Women are less stable than men and it's because they're not held to any decent standards.
Then they turn out as losers with nothing to show, and they're emotionally unstable as a result.

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >This is why women
    Yes and im sure you, the NSFFW /NSFFW/ poster who hasnt talked to a woman in years and shares 2008 trollface memes, are the real expert on what women are.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I am a woman, and 2008 was a great year.

      Really just couldn't find anything super significant to use as the image and searched boys vs girls memes.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Ywnbaw. Trying to copy the autistically skewed idea of femalehood that you have in your head andforcing your identity crisis on everyone else wont change anything.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >women are so miserable
    confirmation bias
    theyre miserable when they interact with you

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Watch videos of women. They're just miserable in general.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It would be measured by whether they are married or not and have off spring or not. A woman failed in life if she's married but has no children, or if she has children but is unmarried, or if she is 30+ with neither.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah but thats such a low bar. Anyone can be married and pump out a crotch goblin.
      Not to mention it sounds fricking awful. Id sooner neck myself than ruin my body to have some moids offspring. Idk.

      Its not an achievement that takes effort. Making money takes effort.
      If we cant hold women to standards that actually take effort to achieve, theyll forever be losers.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >But a woman is successful if she's pretty - an attribute that's mostly out of her control
    not so much these days

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A man finds success in work because it means he can provide. On the other hand a woman's true measure of success has all to do with birthing and raising children. Being a good mother isn't "out of her control" either, and is probably the most underappreciated job out there despite being so invaluable to society as a whole. Women are miserable now because they are trying to be men and holding themselves up to men's standards, all the while also making life worse for men due to being in direct competition with them. I'm all for professional women and what not, but the sad reality is that there are consequences

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Im just not passionate about becoming a mother and I think its lame and theres no glory in it. Id rather kms.
      I choose to follow the mens path because the womens path sucks ballsack.
      I do think we need stay at home parents in families but Im not self sacrificing enough to want to do it myself.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    congrats, you just found out why being a woman sucks. We have been telling you for years

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I havent been on this site for years, I rarely come here. Glad someone agrees though.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I said it generally as to "men"
        I am new to this site

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >A man is successful if he makes money.
    >But a woman is successful if she's pretty

    No. A woman is also successful if she makes money. That's what they said they wanted to do, that's what they fought to do over multiple generations, and now they have it.

    A female doctor or lawyer or a woman with a successful business gets to have money and spend money in exactly the same way a man does. Her money is just as green as his. Women don't get given a special currency that doesn't count.

    The only difference is that a woman can't get someone more attractive than her to FRICK her because she has money. At least not in most cases. There's some Jamaica sex tourism for women now, and things like that, but in most cases in her own country and culture a woman's money can buy her anything but Chad dick.

    And this has revealed that women were ABSOLUTELY FULL OF SHIT when they said that they wanted the chance for monetary success. Because now that (some of them) have it, they stamp their feet and continue to insist that "society doesn't value" women with career or monetary success. And that's because their definition of value, and the only thing they really care about in the end, is Chad's dick. And if they can't get it, that means they "aren't valued".

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >No. A woman is also successful if she makes money.
      according to who?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >>No. A woman is also successful if she makes money.
        >according to who?

        I continued the post and explained that.

        Money is a self-contained metric. If a man works at a job and makes $500k, and a woman works at the same job and makes $500k, they are equally "successful" - because there is nothing outside the dollars metric that we can reference that has any objective validity.

        The woman doesn't FEEL as successful as the man, for the reason I outlined - because her money doesn't buy her Chad's dick, and the man's money might buy him Stacy's snatch, if he leverages it correctly. But her feelings don't matter. It's a second-order metric that says nothing about what "society values" or what constitutes "success" unless and until all women attest and affirm that their definition of success is Chad's dick and Chad's dick ONLY. If they ever admit that, I might then concede OP's point that the only way for a woman to be successful is to be pretty. But they haven't conceded that, and I can tell you right now that they never will. And as long as they don't, I'm entitled to use money as a direct measurement of their success.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Im personally really glad to be born in this time and have the option to go make money and have a career instead of my lifes purpose being breeding with some moid and pumping out crotch fruit like a baby factory.

      Honestly dont give a frick about chad or his dick so no idea about the rest of it.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        OK, great. In that case, I assume that you will now turn to OP and tell him that he's completely wrong when he says:

        https://i.imgur.com/uMzjBNb.jpeg

        There are no standards set for what constitutes success for women now.

        A man is successful if he makes money.

        But a woman is successful if she's pretty - an attribute that's mostly out of her control and declines with age.

        This is why women are so miserable.

        Additionally, nobody's willing to tell women when they suck at things.
        Female friendships don't involve shit talk. They always have to suck up to each other and compliment each other.
        It's not in their nature to be brutally honest with each other.

        This is why women don't develop skills as well as men, and therefore become miserable.

        Women are less stable than men and it's because they're not held to any decent standards.
        Then they turn out as losers with nothing to show, and they're emotionally unstable as a result.

        >a woman is successful if she's pretty

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I am OP. Youre replying to OP right now.

          I just know that what women aspire to is beauty, and what men aspire to is money. Im defining success as what society thinks is admirable and what individuals aspire to.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Im defining success as what society thinks is admirable

            We have an excellent metric that objectively defines what "society" values, and that metric is money. People will give you money if you do things that they value. If people give you a lot of money for what you do, that is "society" granting you success.

            >and what individuals aspire to.

            Well then on this point we're on the same page. Women "aspire" to Chad's dick, and because of that nothing else feels like success to them. But that is not the same as "society" not giving them success. That's their own obsession ruining the rest of life for them. Even after they collectively lied and built an entire political and social movement around the claim that they wanted something else out of life in order to feel "successful". And that means that if they are miserable and don't feel "successful", they fricking deserve it.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >I just know that what women aspire to is beauty, and what men aspire to is money

            I wouldn't say purely money, its the mens capacity to generate money, to support the woman and her children. That's her only priority.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anakin Thot Patrolling

      >No. A woman is also successful if she makes money.
      A woman making money is as successful as a male janitor. No healthy, well-adjusted male, will find her attractive enough to love her for real (lust aside, cause all w*men are qualified for pump'n'dump)
      That woman would be successful by female criteria and should probably find herself an abusive toxic lesbian relationship, cause she chose to forsake her femininity for real world tangible success. She made her Faustian bargain.

      >And this has revealed that women were ABSOLUTELY FULL OF SHIT when they said that they wanted the chance for monetary success.
      Unironically, not all w*men are like that. Just the majority of them. It doesn't help that they are raised on sewer culture. Weak men raised them that way.
      Wanna lay the blame onto someone else?
      Go ahead, /misc/ is that way >>>>>

      [...]

      It won't change a single damn thing. W*men don't have enough testosterone in them to make real tangible changes to the real world. They only do get enough testosterone when they're old and insufferable miserable narcissistic pieces of shits who lived an entire life full of regret and maybe even wiener caurouselling.

      So, Less complaining more self improving.

      You, yourself, have a choice. You can grovel and eat shit and climb the Sigma Grindset like a manly man or you can make a Faustian deal and tap into your feminine energy and live a hedonistic live complaining about w*men on a Chinese cartoon forum.

      Reminder, that while you're here Chad is grooming tight virgin pussy at the Church with a shit eating smug grin on his face. That Motherfricker hurt me while shaking my hand today and gripping too tightly. Mofo is literally 6'2 and thinks it's a good idea to use full force handshake with a scrawny 5'7 nerd.
      Chad doesn't care about weak men's societal expectations. While you're here complaining about the troons on 4chin, he's out there doing political activism to outlaw that israeli degeneracy.

      Edgelord out.

      https://i.imgur.com/uMzjBNb.jpeg

      There are no standards set for what constitutes success for women now.

      A man is successful if he makes money.

      But a woman is successful if she's pretty - an attribute that's mostly out of her control and declines with age.

      This is why women are so miserable.

      Additionally, nobody's willing to tell women when they suck at things.
      Female friendships don't involve shit talk. They always have to suck up to each other and compliment each other.
      It's not in their nature to be brutally honest with each other.

      This is why women don't develop skills as well as men, and therefore become miserable.

      Women are less stable than men and it's because they're not held to any decent standards.
      Then they turn out as losers with nothing to show, and they're emotionally unstable as a result.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Female friendships don't involve shit talk. They always have to suck up to each other and compliment each other.
    >It's not in their nature to be brutally honest with each other.
    It's a bit funny to form such a blunt opinion based on something you can't know because you're not part of it
    You can have a middle point, and it depends on the personality of your friends too, but I've surrounded myself with girls that are honest but not unnecessarily cruel. Whether a boy is good for me or not, if my outfit is pretty, if I said something wrong

    >This is why women don't develop skills as well as men, and therefore become miserable.
    And why would my career and academic success rely on my circle? My personal and professional life are totally separated. I graduated on top of my class because of the way my father raised me, and because my friends kept me motivated, don't be silly. You don't need constant competition to act, and the people that seek that are tiring

    >Women are less stable than men and it's because they're not held to any decent standards.
    This is also a funny one. You do know anger issues imply emotional investability too, right? Men's outbursts come from society's repression of male feelings, while women are allowed to feel freely
    And what do you even mean by "decent standards"?

    This is such a shitty thread op ngl lmao

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Men's outbursts come from society's repression of male feelings, while women are allowed to feel freely

      Literally all empirical data we have demonstrates that freely expressing emotion trains you to feel that emotion more. The entire concepts of repression leading to "outbursts", and catharsis being emotionally healthy, have no empirical support whatsoever. It's the type of theory that SOUNDS like it should be true, and so midwits like you walk around spouting it because you think it makes you sound profound.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The entire concepts of repression leading to "outbursts", and catharsis being emotionally healthy, have no empirical support whatsoever.
        I'm not saying that catharsis is healthy. I'm saying men can be as prone to mental instability as women, but they go through it more quietly and in shame
        It is a fact that repression of emotions can lead to physiological problems, and because they're repressed they can be harder to treat as an underlying cause
        >Uses midwit unironically
        Ur so smart nonny

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I have been saying this for a while but western women need to be MORE emotionally repressed. It shouldn't be considered socially acceptable for adult women to cry, throw tantrums, or have b***h fits. It doesn't happen in non-western women specifically because they also after a certain age get chastised for acting like spoiled children. It used to be that way in the west but at some point western men lost the plot and infantilized their women thinking it was cute when they had emotional outbursts. We have lived with that sin of our ancestors ever since.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          guys just slapped women back in the day when that happened

          you can't do that anymore or you go to jail forever

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Agreed. Theres a difference between overly emotionally repressed and basic emotional regulation.

          Emotions should be expressed in private. Then youre not repressing them but youre not exposing the world to your instability. Its a healthy balance.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And
        >Empirical data
        >Empirical support
        How empirical can you get with psychology? Are you sure I'm the one that's trying to sound smart? Which German idealist is the one that got your panties in a twist, be honest

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    aging sucks im not a woman but how do i avoid aging as much as possible anons

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *