what causes women to become Iike this?

what causes women to become Iike this?

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    women are inherently evil

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What the frick? You can get an Abortion at 22 weeks?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      in Colorado all 9months are legal.
      But one must be seriously moronic to wait that long, at that point you can't even use the fetus to harvest stem cells, it's inherently moronic.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, but abortions at this stage are typically because the life of the mother is in danger or there's severe birth defects in the fetus that make it unlikely to survive long after birth.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Oh ok then, that makes sense I guess. In the case of OP's picture, I don't think I could call the baby a brat after aborting it, even if it was life threatening.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Yes, but abortions at this stage are typically because the life of the mother is in danger or there's severe birth defects in the fetus that make it unlikely to survive long after birth.

        It's more accurate to say that is OCCASIONALLY the reason. It's much more common that the woman was just too stupid, or in denial, to realize she was pregnant for the first few months. Or she was lying to others about her sexual activity or history, and couldn't arrange an abortion without the lie becoming known until some time had passed.

        I really doubt that the woman in OP's picture faced a medical emergency. Frankly in her case it's more likely she deliberately waited so that she could spitefully push her late abortion into other people's faces.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    mental illness and straight up evil people
    Some people calll the fetus parasites, there is obviously no love in the heart of those beings

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      would you rather that she was a mother?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I get the feeling "planned abortions" means they have the pregnancy with the goal of aborting the kid

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        NTA, but I'd rather the kid wasn't murdered, yes.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I would rather be murdered before I can think of anything then grow up like that. Kid would have severe issues and probably just commit crimes themselves

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'd rather she not use psychopathic hate and sadism as a crutch for this emotional and painful experience, doesn't seem mentally healthy, I would rather she not be like that to begin with

        >DONT TELL HER WHAT TO DO
        lol, she is not happy like this, when I see a homeless drug addict I can safely say they are not happy and it is the same when I see OP, these people and society in general is sick

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You stupid mother fricker.
        Little girls pretend to be mothers when they play with baby dolls. They wait their whole life for it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Just like your oshi!

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    think about it, these are the women who not only have sex, they have it regularly, so regularly in fact that it has become banal to the point they get pregnant by sheer accident.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Seeing redditors pretend to be against this is funny as frick to me. If you're a "progressive" you literally have no reason to be against fetishes/sexual degeneracy

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why did u block the name u fricking gay

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i hope she gets raped after abortion becomes illegal

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    99% of the content on the internet is ragebait at this point. Some people feel extremely demoralized and depressed about the state of the world and do silly ragebait hoaxes like this to get a rise out of people. React accordingly fren

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Women have killed more babies through abortion then men have killed in every war in history, so remember that when some moronic b***h goes on about "moids are soo violent"

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The difference is on one side, you have genocide, mass rape, destruction, and countless sentient human beings suffering the worst conditions imaginable. On the other side you have an outpatient procedure that takes a couple of hours at most, affects no one, and the only thing being destroyed is an unthinking blob of flesh.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        A fetus develops consciousness somewhere at 20-24 weeks of gestation. Abortion of a healthy fetus at 22 weeks is the same as murdering an infant, the only difference is that the former has no legal protections.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          no one knows how consciousness works to make this claim

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No cognitive functions are going on at that stage of development. At best the lizard brain is just telling the heart to beat and the organs to function. Quite literally a smooth brain.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If the baby's behavior is different when awake than when asleep, that's "conscious".

            When lizards are awake, guess what, bro? They're "conscious". I think you might have a better shot of being right if you use "sapient" instead of "conscious".

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            even utilitarians realize the importance of sanctities.
            some actions should be so forbidden and taboo that even the mere thought of them is terrifying even if in some special cases no harm is done. that's the only way to resolve dilemmas like necrophilia, murder for fun, safe incest, etc
            taking a human life is one of those things

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Holy shit this is the most moronic reddit roastie cope I've ever seen.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >consciousness
          isn't real, moron

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Women ruin millions more kids as single mothers, who they are directly responsible for raising right but fail to in ways which include but aren't limited to unnecessary beatings and letting literal pedos/rapists around their kids so they can get some dick for themselves. You could kill someone painlessly and you're still killing them, cope like this is just more proof of women's inferiority and them being allergic to responsibility. Suffering doesn't really matter to women unless it's women suffering, that's why they inflict so much on others while trying and failing to lie about it.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Women ruin millions more kids as single mothers
          Yes. And by screeching about abortion you now get to deal with even more single mothers. Good job.

          >You could kill someone painlessly and you're still killing them
          Kill =/= Murder.

          >proof of women's inferiority and them being allergic to responsibility.
          I doubt you're as good as you think you are, and humanity has for countless years now try to strip away responsibilities and hardships. Why do you think the Industrial Revolution happened?

          >Suffering doesn't really matter to women unless it's women suffering, that's why they inflict so much on others while trying and failing to lie about it.
          Such as what? Not fricking fugly spergs just because they asked nicely?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >the solution to women abusing and ruining kids is to kill kids but cope about how it doesn't count because they weren't 18 yet
            Yet women cry about just a few of them dying
            >developments in technology are the same as a woman failing to use the available technology to instead abuse and kill her kids
            Lol
            >Such as what?
            I mean besides killing, beating, raping and mentally abusing kids women also beat on and mental abuse their male partners funny enough. Women initiate more physical fights in relationships or at home than the men and that's while men are still under reporting out of embarrassment. Women are deranged lying cry bullies.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >the solution to women abusing and ruining kids is to kill kids but cope about how it doesn't count because they weren't 18 yet
            Ok so now you're shifting your argument towards kids and not fetuses with no conscious. You can't abuse that which cannot experience.

            >developments in technology are the same as a woman failing to use the available technology to instead abuse and kill her kids
            They were using modern technology to abort unwanted fetuses.

            >I mean besides killing, beating, raping and mentally abusing kids women also beat on and mental abuse their male partners funny enough.
            Gonna need a source for this one.

            >Women initiate more physical fights in relationships or at home than the men and that's while men are still under reporting out of embarrassment.
            Self-reported studies should never be used as a source, but rather as an indicator at best. Sample size, geographic location, and those surveyed are also important.

            >Women are deranged lying cry bullies.
            Somebody has mommy issues.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's not shifting the argument, you coping with muh conscious doesn't change that these are human children unique from a sperm egg or skin cell who the women have had killed by the millions. And it doesn't change all the many kids many years out the womb women also abuse and kill. Women have had birth control for years, more types than men have available too, but still rather kill their kids.
            >Gonna need a source for this one
            https://aliesq.medium.com/extensive-research-women-initiate-domestic-violence-more-than-men-men-under-report-it-3bbaa4fbec9d

            >self reports don't count
            But you would say to believe women and cry misogyny if it was their experience being dismissed lol

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >muh conscious doesn't change that these are human children unique from a sperm egg or skin cell
            The uniqueness of the genetic code doesn't even factor into this. In fact, irrelevant.

            >And it doesn't change all the many kids many years out the womb women also abuse and kill.
            We're talking about abortion, not child abuse.

            >Women have had birth control for years, more types than men have available too, but still rather kill their kids.
            Only if they can afford it or don't react negatively to them. Of course, birth control is the way to go because an abortion is far more expensive and risky compared to just taking a pill.

            >https://aliesq.medium.com/extensive-research-women-initiate-domestic-violence-more-than-men-men-under-report-it-3bbaa4fbec9d
            >"Results. Almost 24% of all relationships had some violence, and half (49.7%) of those were reciprocally violent. In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases."
            So about a quarter of all relationships have some form of violence in them and about half of that quarter, or 1/8th, or about 12.5% of all relationships had reciprocated violence, and the other 1/8th or 12.5% was one way (or non-reciprocated), with women initiating the violence in 70% of cases, or about 8.75% of all relationships sampled. Keep in mind this study is from 2007 and a lot more boomers were alive back then, who seemed to have higher rates of abuse compared to millennials or zoomers. Are you mathematically illiterate?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The uniqueness of the genetic code doesn't even factor into this. In fact, irrelevant
            It actually is relevant though that if left alone the fetus will have a heartbeat within the first month and grow into an adult if left alone, which is completely different from any other clump of cells like you people like to mention.
            >We're talking about abortion, not child abuse
            Actually we were talking about general suffering caused

            The difference is on one side, you have genocide, mass rape, destruction, and countless sentient human beings suffering the worst conditions imaginable. On the other side you have an outpatient procedure that takes a couple of hours at most, affects no one, and the only thing being destroyed is an unthinking blob of flesh.

            Women ruin millions more kids as single mothers, who they are directly responsible for raising right but fail to in ways which include but aren't limited to unnecessary beatings and letting literal pedos/rapists around their kids so they can get some dick for themselves. You could kill someone painlessly and you're still killing them, cope like this is just more proof of women's inferiority and them being allergic to responsibility. Suffering doesn't really matter to women unless it's women suffering, that's why they inflict so much on others while trying and failing to lie about it.

            have a nice day liar
            >Only if they can afford it or don't react negatively to them
            Money is thrown at women constantly from both the government and desperate men, this isn't just about not having money it's about failure to use the money for what's important.
            >Are you mathematically illiterate?
            Are you? That clearly shows women are more often violent even though that's not the full number of men dealing with it being reported, and you're coping by mentioning boomers but the stereotype or what's expected then is the man beating the wife for slightly burnt food, not the women being as violent and more violent than the men.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >So about a quarter of all relationships have some form of violence in them and about half of that quarter, or 1/8th, or about 12.5% of all relationships had reciprocated violence, and the other 1/8th or 12.5% was one way (or non-reciprocated), with women initiating the violence in 70% of cases

            Those statistics taken together indicate that women are more likely to be domestic abusers than men.

            The reciprocal cases cancel out. We're left with the one-way cases, and women instigate 70% of those.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It doesn't matter if they're being more abusive you're mathematically illiterate because I can't accept it mkay

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It does not state that. It states that 24% of all relationships sampled have some form of abuse, with about half of that 24% being single-sided, and 70% of all single-sided abusive relationships being initiated by the woman.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You can't abuse that which cannot experience.
            This is the singular most moronic point I have seen on the internet.
            Humans
            >abuse drugs
            >abuse the environment
            >abuse the animals in it
            Its really not all that much of a stretch to consider this, and a lot of abortion now, a simple form of abuse that women and hedonists are using to exert power/control over society. Are you fricking moronic?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            drugs
            No one is going to be mad if you flush your drugs down the toilet.

            the environment
            The environment is incapable of cognition.

            >abuse the animals in it
            Animals are capable of experience, therefore they can experience abuse.

            >Its really not all that much of a stretch to consider this, and a lot of abortion now, a simple form of abuse that women and hedonists are using to exert power/control over society.
            So people who would like to enjoy their lives without unnecessary responsibilities or restrictions?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >So people who would like to enjoy their lives without unnecessary responsibilities or restrictions
            That can be done without killing like you're advocating for. Unless the women were raped pregnancy is a restriction they put on themselves.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Really while women cry about how oppressed and uniquely mistreated they are they're getting away with absolutely terrorizing everyone of course including other women. Textbook crybully behavior.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          So what do we do then? Sex dolls and robots? Artificial wombs? Don't make me laugh with this cringe worthy incel shit. Its creepy as hell. Do you really want to live in such a scary artificial world where its only men around with their fake women and wombs? That sounds like a strange hell I don't want to be a part of.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >So what do we do then?
            Stop breeding as if you can offer your kids better than a creepy hell anyway

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's already creepy fake and miserable with bio women around or because they're around

            >I am angry with real women so instead I want to support a world that has artificial women so that I can use them how I see fit and they can never reject me ever again
            Hilarious how you incel virgin losers hate women so much but yet even your cyborg Orwellian nightmare dystopias that you claim would be a paradise for your kind still has you guys obsessing over females anyways. You homosexuals just want mind control over women. Cut straight to the point already and stop being such whiny pathetic losers.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Even women hate other women because they're loathsome by choice and despite having better choices available. They also can't be taught better or even protected anymore to improve the overall situation because they'll cry incel or misogyny much like you're doing now. I don't even believe in ai, sex bots, artificial wombs etc because not breeding is clearly better. It's just funny that your reasons for a cyborg world being hell are already present now and provided to you by these women you're trying to defend. Not just fake in terms of appearances but in personality as well. And as for creepy a lot of these women fit that as well with the unstable behavior they blame on periods/menopause, the bad surgeries they have done, and the bad makeup tattoos piercings etc. Let's definitely cut right to the point here, this isn't about you being afraid of a strange fake hell because the precious women you defend ensure you already live in one, this is about your blind love for those same women who wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire. Now that's really pathetic.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's already creepy fake and miserable with bio women around or because they're around

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Having their trendiness questioned by their political tribe

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If I'm not a cucked Jesus freak why should I give two shits about some prostitute aborting a kid that isn't mine?

    >OH NO!!!! Chad an Stacy aborted their baby! I care so much! I care so fricking much about people aborting babies that aren't mine!

    I hope the dumb b***h gets 10 more abortions and some homosexual Chad Godgay kills her and gets the death penalty for it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That would be the best outcome. Militant anti abortion/pro abortion people are both annoying virtue signaling c**ts

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >virtue signaling c**ts
        I'd love to see how you would fare in a world where you can legally kill for convenience, you wouldn't last long.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I'd outlast you considering I don't interfere in people's business pretending I give a frick about another person's child

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If you could kill kids you forced into existence and who couldn't do anything to anybody if they tried what makes you think acting like a timid b***h would save you? You'd get killed just for being ugly and twitchy.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            So not interfering with random people in a world where killing for convenience is allowed is considered timid? You're literally proving my point by being more concerned with other people's lives rather than your own, in your gay little fake scenario. Thanks for the laugh though

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >So not interfering with random people in a world where killing for convenience is allowed is considered timid?
            Thinking you would be spared for simply constantly keeping your head down out of fear of death does out you as timid and stupid. You're proving you're a stupid pussy. You would not be spared in a world where you could kill for any reason and people's own kids were fair game, how special do you think you are? Main character syndrome.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Thinking you would be spared for simply constantly keeping your head down out of fear of death does out you as timid and stupid.

            Except instead of pretending I'm some anti abortion Messiah like you, I'd be too busy keeping my family and people safe. I know you have no friends, and your parents cut you off years ago for being a disappointment, but normal people have friends and family they'd rather see live in a challenging time than grandstand about a stupid political issue.

            And I'm the one with main character syndrome lol lmao

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Except instead of pretending I'm some anti abortion Messiah like you, I'd be too busy keeping my family and people safe
            Except you wouldn't do shit if you simply minded your own business because again besides other people constantly getting in your business for resources and whims anyway, you wouldn't even care to have your family in a good or safer established community because you honestly think it's enough to leave whatever kind of people alone and they'll act right in return. You and your family, if they even exist, would be screwed. But hey you really showed it to those pro lifers and showed how real you are.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Your reaction when they kill you for resources or because they just suspected you did something
            >b-b-but I left you fine upstanding people alone how could you do this! Heh well at least I was real not one of those virtue signaling-ACK

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Except instead of pretending I'm some anti abortion Messiah like you, I'd be too busy keeping my family and people safe
            Except you wouldn't do shit if you simply minded your own business because again besides other people constantly getting in your business for resources and whims anyway, you wouldn't even care to have your family in a good or safer established community because you honestly think it's enough to leave whatever kind of people alone and they'll act right in return. You and your family, if they even exist, would be screwed. But hey you really showed it to those pro lifers and showed how real you are.

            So not just being blindly anti abortion and acknowledging there's nuance means total virtue and belief is dead as a whole and people will kill you and your family to get ahead whenever the opportunity strikes. You guys are actually moronic

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If it was legal to kill you and me like it was legal for women to kill their kids you would be dead in no time, yes. Not getting in people's business wouldn't change the potential benefits of offing you, and you're moronic if you think you're so special it would work different.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If it was legal to kill you and me like it was legal for women to kill their kids you would be dead in no time, yes.

            Except this is yet another "what if" because it's not like that. I've just now became aware you think I'm pro abortion which is probably why you've been desperately defending that side tooth and nail. Reasons why someone might get an abortion is far different then why someone would commit murder.

            >like it was legal for women to kill their kids

            That's why there needs to be limits and a criteria for why someone would get an abortion. As stated before, Christ cucks are annoying, and I hate thots, but ultimately I have no say in the matter so again I ask, why should I care? And no what ifs this time.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Reasons why someone might get an abortion is far different then why someone would commit murder
            The person being in their way or holding them back from whatever they want is enough. In the case of most abortions it's the parents bringing their kids into the world and into their business and then killing them anyway because they interfere with other things in their life that they want. In that scenario there's no way a fetus is floating into a b***hes stomach to get in her business, but it doesn't matter they still kill them despite starting the problem in the first place. Again if you could kill kids like that no one would really be off limits if current restrictions were removed. I can't make you care about the type of people you're surrounded by but if there's enough of them chances are it won't be enough to just ignore whatever they do. They'll probably be interacting with you and whoever you're close with, and if they're twisted enough they could be a bad influence at best and do serious damage at worst.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Fluent reasoning finally. Not much I haven't heard and considered before but appreciate the coherent input instead of the hypotheticals

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      because you live in a society and when it malfunctions you'll be exposed to violence and starvation

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    is this subreddit active?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      allegedIy

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Its some psycho moid who wrote this on his gf as humiliation ritual

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bro. If this is real, and the baby did not have some kind of condition that would cause it to develop consciousness, then this is just murder. The kind of murder that any woman in many places in North America can get away with.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Killing? Sure. Murder? No. No conscious being was snuffed out. The lights were on but no one was home.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I define murder as unjustified killing. And in my view the thing that makes humans be worthy of moral consideration is the conscious experience. A fetus develops consciousness at 20-24 weeks of gestation. So tell me, what exactly do you base your assertion on?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          And I define murder as the unjustified ending of a consciousness. A fetus doesn't develop consciousness until the final stages of development. At 5 months at most, it's involuntary movement, sleep/wake, and keeping the organs functioning. There's a reason you don't remember your birth or even the first year or two of your own life. Neural pathways for rational thought, sense of self, etc. don't develop until you get to experience the world.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >No conscious being was snuffed out. The lights were on but no one was home.

        Babies are born at 24 weeks have a 70% chance of surviving. Is it your position that they aren't conscious at birth?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes. No higher thought processes are going on at that time. The brain at that point is little more than a pacemaker and organ supervisor. Even then, they need to spend the next few months in an incubator with close attention and care. 70% is not that great of a success rate, which means about 1/3rd will die.

          >The uniqueness of the genetic code doesn't even factor into this. In fact, irrelevant
          It actually is relevant though that if left alone the fetus will have a heartbeat within the first month and grow into an adult if left alone, which is completely different from any other clump of cells like you people like to mention.
          >We're talking about abortion, not child abuse
          Actually we were talking about general suffering caused
          [...]
          [...]
          have a nice day liar
          >Only if they can afford it or don't react negatively to them
          Money is thrown at women constantly from both the government and desperate men, this isn't just about not having money it's about failure to use the money for what's important.
          >Are you mathematically illiterate?
          Are you? That clearly shows women are more often violent even though that's not the full number of men dealing with it being reported, and you're coping by mentioning boomers but the stereotype or what's expected then is the man beating the wife for slightly burnt food, not the women being as violent and more violent than the men.

          >It actually is relevant though that if left alone the fetus will have a heartbeat within the first month and grow into an adult if left alone, which is completely different from any other clump of cells like you people like to mention.
          But we're not talking about "leaving it alone". We're talking about a small slice of time or an instance. Killing a fetus is not the same thing as killing a 3-year-old, an adult, a senior, etc.

          >Money is thrown at women constantly from both the government and desperate men, this isn't just about not having money it's about failure to use the money for what's important.
          Like aborting unwanted fetuses?

          >Are you? That clearly shows women are more often violent even though that's not the full number of men dealing with it being reported, and you're coping by mentioning boomers but the stereotype or what's expected then is the man beating the wife for slightly burnt food, not the women being as violent and more violent than the men.
          From what I gather from the article, about ~8.75% of all relationships sampled were single-sided with the woman being abusive. I don't deny abusive women exist, but you really ought to pay attention to the wording. Many researchers will hide their findings behind percentages because many people don't know how to work with them.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Hello. I'm this guy

            I have a question to the people in this thread. Could you provide me any studies on the development of fetal/infant sentience/consciousness? Something that would state "it's impossible at this stage" or "the physical pathways between the thalamus and the prefrontal cortex are established somewhere in these weeks of gestation". Thank you!

            Could you give me any sources you base your claims on? Also, what do you think about the ethics of killing newborns?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >But we're not talking about "leaving it alone". We're talking about a small slice of time or an instance. Killing a fetus is not the same thing as killing a 3-year-old, an adult, a senior, etc.
            Ok but that wasn't all that was being talked about, but even then a 3 year old isn't the same as an adult either. They don't have any real complicated thoughts and can't even take care of themselves. If you're arguing it's fine to kill as long as it's undeveloped you can easily argue the same with anyone moronic or under 18.
            >Like aborting unwanted fetuses
            Euphemism for killing their kids which they think counts as taking responsibility for forcing them into their womb by mostly being irresponsible prostitutes in the first place, which again isn't necessary when they have like 12 forms of birth control and the funds for it despite you trying to pretend otherwise.
            >From what I gather from the article, about ~8.75% of all relationships sampled were single-sided with the woman being abusive
            And it shows not only women being abusive like I mentioned before posting it but it shows them being MORE abusive again despite the common stereotype and lack of men speaking up, you projecting homosexual.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Hi. This guy

            I have a question to the people in this thread. Could you provide me any studies on the development of fetal/infant sentience/consciousness? Something that would state "it's impossible at this stage" or "the physical pathways between the thalamus and the prefrontal cortex are established somewhere in these weeks of gestation". Thank you!

            again. What kind of brain processing ability/-ies or brain activity would you consider to be worth moral consideration? Also, do you know at which point during fetal/infant/childhood stage it occurs? If so, what do you base it on?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Ok but that wasn't all that was being talked about, but even then a 3 year old isn't the same as an adult either. They don't have any real complicated thoughts and can't even take care of themselves. If you're arguing it's fine to kill as long as it's undeveloped you can easily argue the same with anyone moronic or under 18.
            Complexity of neural activity. A 3-year-old, while still needing care, unless mentally disabled is going to still have a favorite color, show love and affection to their parents, be fascinated by dinosaurs or dolls, ask a lot of questions, etc.

            >Euphemism for killing their kids which they think counts as taking responsibility for forcing them into their womb by mostly being irresponsible prostitutes in the first place, which again isn't necessary when they have like 12 forms of birth control and the funds for it despite you trying to pretend otherwise.
            Kids =/= Fetus. Unless we're talking about rape, nothing has been forced, and even then a fetus until the very last few weeks cannot be considered a conscious being.

            >And it shows not only women being abusive like I mentioned before posting it but it shows them being MORE abusive again despite the common stereotype and lack of men speaking up, you projecting homosexual.
            It clearly states that women initiate 70% of non-reciprocal abusive relationships, which isn't all relationships. Do you seriously believe that 70% of all relationships are abusive and initiated by the woman?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Kids =/= Fetus
            Kids =/=teens=/=adults
            >A 3-year-old, while still needing care, unless mentally disabled is going to still have a favorite color, show love and affection to their parents, be fascinated by dinosaurs or dolls, ask a lot of questions, etc.
            So like an animal can do
            >It clearly states that women initiate 70% of non-reciprocal abusive relationships, which isn't all relationships
            No one said all women, you are definitely projecting your illiteracy at this point. It doesn't have to be all women to show many more women not only hit their men but hit their man when he's not starting the fight or hitting back than the opposite.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Kids =/=teens=/=adults
            Yes?

            >So like an animal can do
            Yes? An animal is a multicellular organism. Can range from as small as a tardigrade to an elephant. What do you think you classify as?

            >No one said all women, ... It doesn't have to be all women to show many more women not only hit their men but hit their man when he's not starting the fight or hitting back than the opposite.
            Precisely. Which is about ~12.5% of all relationships that have single-sided violence. But I think you're forgetting about the reciprocally violent relationships.

            >Unless we're talking about rape, nothing has been forced
            The baby is always forced into the womb by the parents because it has no choice, unlike the women mostly do since the vast majority of abortions aren't because of rape.
            >a fetus until the very last few weeks cannot be considered a conscious being
            Anyone asleep isn't a conscious being, so for you it's fine to kill any stage of human as long as they're sleeping.

            >The baby is always forced into the womb by the parents because it has no choice, unlike the women mostly do since the vast majority of abortions aren't because of rape.
            And the baby, until the last few weeks of development is unthinking and incapable of understanding, or having a sense of self.

            >Anyone asleep isn't a conscious being, so for you it's fine to kill any stage of human as long as they're sleeping.
            Sleep is not the same thing as an inability for cognition.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Yes? An animal is a multicellular organism
            But you don't treat a dog the same as a human do you? I mean you probably are that type.
            >Precisely. Which is about ~12.5% of all relationships that have single-sided violence. But I think you're forgetting about the reciprocally violent relationships.
            No one's forgetting anything you're just pretending the data doesn't show exactly what it was posted to show and projecting your illiteracy.
            >And the baby, until the last few weeks of development is unthinking and incapable of understanding, or having a sense of self
            The baby is still clearly human just undeveloped, someone can kill a sleeping human or child outside the womb unaware and painlessly but it wouldn't change what was done.
            >Sleep is not the same thing as an inability for cognition
            But sleep is the opposite of being conscious which was what you were talking about.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >But you don't treat a dog the same as a human do you? I mean you probably are that type.
            No, but I wouldn't cause undue harm to a dog, or mistreat it. What does killing a dog or degrading it do for me? Nothing.

            >No one's forgetting anything you're just pretending the data doesn't show exactly what it was posted to show and projecting your illiteracy.
            Still waiting for your proof. As in mathematical proof. You keep making statements, I've already walked you through the article multiple times now, and yet you just ignore it.

            >The baby is still clearly human just undeveloped, someone can kill a sleeping human or child outside the womb unaware and painlessly but it wouldn't change what was done.
            I find it interesting you keep trying to work sleeping people into the same category as children or fetuses. No one is going to weep if a sapling gets cut down.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >No, but I wouldn't cause undue harm to a dog, or mistreat it. What does killing a dog or degrading it do for me? Nothing
            Despite a toddler being less capable and intelligent than a dog you don't consider treating them the same as a dog, even though you're all in favor of killing kids in the womb because they're currently lacking in development compared to older humans. Dogs can be and are killed and abused much more easily than humans because they're seen as lesser animals. But what's the issue we're all animals amirite *tips fedora*.
            >Still waiting for your proof
            You were given evidence and denied it
            >I find it interesting you keep trying to work sleeping people into the same category as children or fetuses. No one is going to weep if a sapling gets cut down.
            Hardly anyone cares about full grown trees, it's interesting you think bringing that up means anything. You were the one who mentioned being conscious mattered.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Despite a toddler being less capable and intelligent than a dog you don't consider treating them the same as a dog,
            Dogs typically don't have obsessions with dinosaurs or ask a lot of questions. Even then it depends on the breed of the dog.

            >Dogs can be and are killed and abused much more easily than humans because they're seen as lesser animals.
            Dogs are abused and killed because there are a lot of sick fricks out there that should have been aborted, often the product of would-be incels but sadly we're about 1/3rd of the way towards total incel bloodline death.

            >You were given evidence and denied it
            Mathematically disproved. It's not my problem you can't read an article without becoming emotionally involved.

            >Hardly anyone cares about full grown trees, it's interesting you think bringing that up means anything.
            Because a sapling is not a tree.

            >You were the one who mentioned being conscious mattered.
            Complexity of neural activity.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Dogs typically don't have obsessions with dinosaurs or ask a lot of questions
            Toddlers especially in the 1-3 year range aren't asking a lot of questions either because the number of words they know is typically limited. Dogs can be obsessed with certain toys or objects. Unreal you even said this. So I guess those toddler are fair game for sub dog treatment or late abortion huh.
            >Dogs are abused and killed because there are a lot of sick fricks out there that should have been aborted, often the product of would-be incels but sadly we're about 1/3rd of the way towards total incel bloodline death.
            Dogs are treated worse because they're mentally and physically inferior to most humans.
            >Mathematically disproved
            Where? You're projecting again.
            >Because a sapling is not a
            But no one cries over grown trees or saplings and they're completely different from animals or humans. Something must be wrong with you.
            >Complexity of neural activity
            So not the same intelligence

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Kids don't even speak their first word until a year after being born so that anon might actually be ready to kill a newborn

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >sick fricks out there that should have been aborted, often the product of would-be incels but sadly we're about 1/3rd of the way towards total incel bloodline death
            >you can't read an article without becoming emotionally involved
            Kek

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >So like an animal can do
            Specifically a dog can learn around the same number of words as a 3 year old, guess they should start putting them on leashes or electric colors and letting them sleep outside since they're basically an animal at that point and won't possibly develop further with age.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Unless we're talking about rape, nothing has been forced
            The baby is always forced into the womb by the parents because it has no choice, unlike the women mostly do since the vast majority of abortions aren't because of rape.
            >a fetus until the very last few weeks cannot be considered a conscious being
            Anyone asleep isn't a conscious being, so for you it's fine to kill any stage of human as long as they're sleeping.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Did nobody look into reddit before they went on the stock exchange.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    OY MY GODDDDDDDDDDDDDD

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why are roasties like this?

      Hey foid, *flap flap flap*

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Theoretically speaking someone could get access to the subreddit and leak any identifiable information or usernames, which would be a tragedy, of course

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Abortion is human sacrifice, but this passes over into ritual sacrifice. This is no different from what ancient Baal worshipers were doing.

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Women don't have object permanence. They can be told there is a living fricking being growing inside of them and still want to kill it because it hasn't jettisoned out their c**t yet.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Women don't have object permanence.
      Based autist women

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Moids manipulating 80 IQ women to do deranged vile shit to satisfy disgusting fetishes of said moids.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's not men's fault women are mostly 80 iq, or that you cut your penis off to do this.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Women are incapable of feeling and perception to the same extent as men. They are cats to dogs. Apples to bananas.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't care if it's murder or not honestly. women should be able to kill the kid inside them if they want to, I'm not going to sit here and moralgay and act like I don't think life is unfathomably worse than being dead. Being real.

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I have a question to the people in this thread. Could you provide me any studies on the development of fetal/infant sentience/consciousness? Something that would state "it's impossible at this stage" or "the physical pathways between the thalamus and the prefrontal cortex are established somewhere in these weeks of gestation". Thank you!

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the eeee ickeeer

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Any argument about when it's "correct" or "ok" to abort already starts off on the wrong foot. Fact of the matter is sex and conception us 99.99% of cases, a choice. So the argument is really when does it start becoming "human" or "alive" enough to justify killing it beforehand, EVEN THOUGH YOU CHOSE TO HAVE SEX. And then the audacity of these sick fricks to use cases of rape victims or defects, real tragedies, to justify this debauchery. As always though, even if we do consider arguments about when someone is valid to kill, they are completely subjective and depend on what you consider "life" to be. In my eyes it's simple really, life happens when the every decent couple that wants kids thinks that it happens, at conception. Why? Because it's logically consistent, if a couple wants a baby they consider it alive at conception, and a tragedy when the baby dies (even if i-its not even conscious at x amount of weeks bro), it's only when people don't want it they make up all these sorts of copes to justify killing what is their responsibility and the result of their choices and actions, thinking their right to coom is above another humans right to live.

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I let people kill their own children. They wouldn't make good parents

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      (Kill their children in the womb)

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      (Kill their children in the womb)

      Why not out the womb? What's the morally significant difference?

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    evil landwhale deserves to die alone

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    too many rights

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Even women hate other women because they're loathsome by choice and despite having better choices available. They also can't be taught better or even protected anymore to improve the overall situation because they'll cry incel or misogyny much like you're doing now. I don't even believe in ai, sex bots, artificial wombs etc because not breeding is clearly better. It's just funny that your reasons for a cyborg world being hell are already present now and provided to you by these women you're trying to defend. Not just fake in terms of appearances but in personality as well. And as for creepy a lot of these women fit that as well with the unstable behavior they blame on periods/menopause, the bad surgeries they have done, and the bad makeup tattoos piercings etc. Let's definitely cut right to the point here, this isn't about you being afraid of a strange fake hell because the precious women you defend ensure you already live in one, this is about your blind love for those same women who wouldn't piss on you if you were on fire. Now that's really pathetic.

    Way to project a whole lot of absolute garbage with assumptions about me you don't even know to be true at all. I know that women are insufferable. I absolutely agree with that. I know that they like to blame their behaviors on external factors or at the very least they are in far more control of their negative behavior than they ever let men realize.

    This does not change the fact guys like you are creepy weirdo incel losers that have failed at life and are so miserable you simply want to see the physically weaker sex suffer simply because you do not like how they behave. You also do not like that they do not want to deal with you in any romantic or sexual way. You can tell me you don't believe in AI, sex bots and artificial wombs all you want but the fact is not only do many sexless moronic men do believe in them but many here aren't joking when they unironically say they want such a world to come to fruition.

    It cannot be any clearer to me how pathetic you types are. I lump you guys into the same category as other men in the manosphere community including even MGTOW men that have had sexual success. Incel men are just the lowest of the low on this spectrum of angry pathetic loser males.

    As for me? I'm going to go by irl experiences from now on. More importantly, I am going to have a good character and conduct myself in a proper manner no matter where I am from now on. My interactions with women over the past years has been nothing but positive ever since dropping the whole "I hate women, they must suffer, I want sex, ahhh" attitude.

    Not surprised a homosexual like you has nothing but talking points you are regurgitating from other men you learned from on the internet. Because again, you are a pathetic loser who fails at life and doesn't want to be a good human being anyways. You want an excuse to not be.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I agree women are absolute shit but women suffering for their bad actions and any men saying they find it satisfying or deserved are bad human beans who make me heckin angry
      Go die in a fire you stupid coping homosexual

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And there it is. The angry incel rage coming out like a cancerous foul smelling demon. You just had to bring it out didn't you? What don't you fricking understand you homosexual? Women are physically weak compared to men. Of course they are going to have insecurity and lots of anxiety that will manifest itself in sometimes appalling types of behaviors. Its because they don't have the same internal security that we as men should have. Key words being should have. Go lift weights and become a much better you you fricking homosexual. Then maybe you won't have to be as whiny and b***hy as these women you obsessively hate on 24/7 on a comedy image board such as /NSFFW/.

        >You can tell me you don't believe in AI, sex bots and artificial wombs all you want but the fact is not only do many sexless moronic men do believe in them but many here aren't joking when they unironically say they want such a world to come to fruition
        So you supposedly acknowledge how bad women are but you screech at men for wanting better and you don't see that the world you fear is already here thanks to women, probably because you started simping and acting like a eunuch/gay friend. You really are pathetic.

        How the frick is providing dipshits such as yourself with a goddamn sex doll supposed to improve matters? Why not just admit you cannot control your dick instead? At least just watch porn and use your own hand ffs jesus fricking christ you guys are insane. Want solutions from me? Same I told previous anon. Work out, improve yourself as much as you can. Deal with women in an intelligent manner. If you keep meeting bad ones, just move on and try with others. To let physically weak people get this much into your head is beyond sad. Women want the safety and comfort a strong man can provide for them as well as society because they naturally have insecurity problems due to how we are built by nature as people moron. Yes the dolls and wombs thing creeps me out. Just like how mad scienists creating hybrid mosquitos that can even carry diseases is creepy. Just like how them creating hybrids right now is creepy. As well as them pushing vegan meats, and it goes on and on. Guys like you want to live in a completely artificial hell planet. If I had two choices one being your hellish utopia and the other being we are back to living in tribes and huts, I'll take the later any day. Women may have been shit to you but they sure aren't to all men.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          So in your mind; if you are anxious because you are weaker than the opposite gender it justifies murdering your children? What ever helps you sleep I guess...

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Women are physically weak compared to men
          See

          >YOU CAN'T HATE THEM FOR MAKING EVERYTHING WORSE CUZ THEY'RE PHYSICALLY WEAKER

          >How the frick is providing dipshits such as yourself with a goddamn sex doll supposed to improve matters?
          Men are better off with a sex doll or jerking off to porn than paying some or multiple b***hes not to frick them or giving themselves a rotten dick cycling through countless slags until they find a unicorn. Women are shit for the majority of men it's just to varying levels which usually get worse with age, something else that makes porn/dolls better.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No moron these men should be encouraged to do better. To do nofap, stop watching the porn, and improve in all areas of their lives, you idiot.

            >I'm such a loser I can't control my horny level so I need dolls for sex because those evil women won't give it to me and they totally deserve to be beaten for denying me
            That is you guys itt.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Improving and not touching your dick won't magically improve women or make them stop acting like c**ts you delusional homosexual, and the men fricking women still watch porn.
            >>I'm such a loser I can't control my horny level so I need dolls for sex because those evil women won't give it to me and they totally deserve to be beaten for denying me
            See

            >It isn't them who made things worse homosexual
            It absolutely is homosexual, these women don't have to listen and so haven't listened to or obeyed men unless it's convenient for them in many years. So when they frick up or do evil it's their own fault. Women constantly lie to and manipulate and weaponize men using their pussy, the simps (probably someone like you) who attack other men on behalf of prostitutes being an enemy to men doesn't change that those women are also an enemy who's actively making things worse for her own profit. Funny enough these men who attack other men for women would actually repeat the shit you're saying that "the women are physically weaker how dare you". You're one of those homosexuals who swarm the guy for slapping a b***h who slapped him first again because "they're physically weaker bro". You are one of those men that makes things worse.

            And stop coping. The men who would use porn or dolls ARE controlling their own sex drives and not bothering your queens by themselves. You're just mad YOU can't control those men's dicks because you're a worthless moron who has zero say in it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >You can tell me you don't believe in AI, sex bots and artificial wombs all you want but the fact is not only do many sexless moronic men do believe in them but many here aren't joking when they unironically say they want such a world to come to fruition
      So you supposedly acknowledge how bad women are but you screech at men for wanting better and you don't see that the world you fear is already here thanks to women, probably because you started simping and acting like a eunuch/gay friend. You really are pathetic.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >YOU CAN'T HATE THEM FOR MAKING EVERYTHING WORSE CUZ THEY'RE PHYSICALLY WEAKER

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It isn't them who made things worse homosexual. It is men who did you moronic loser. Who is going to knock on your door and haul you off to the camps huh? Is it going to be women? Or men in uniform doing it? Men have always been the actual villains and always will be. No woman is going to try committing mass genocides and violence on men. They want men too much to ever want to do that. They just hate weak men. Such as you. It will be men pushing your fricking shit in as you type your next cringe posts on this image board while wearing your undies hugging your stupid anime pillow and fapping to the latest troony porn you love so much you dumb ass. Keep thinking this is a mother fricking game incel. Keep being a whiny little b***h as your mind breaks to the point of no return and life itself never gives you favors anymore. The universe is as mental as it is physical. I'd rather be on the good side of people who know how to win at life than be like you. Some of you wiener suckers even claim to have never had a woman hug you. Insane, absolutely insane you are so wretched a woman wouldn't even want to hug your stink ass.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >It isn't them who made things worse homosexual
          It absolutely is homosexual, these women don't have to listen and so haven't listened to or obeyed men unless it's convenient for them in many years. So when they frick up or do evil it's their own fault. Women constantly lie to and manipulate and weaponize men using their pussy, the simps (probably someone like you) who attack other men on behalf of prostitutes being an enemy to men doesn't change that those women are also an enemy who's actively making things worse for her own profit. Funny enough these men who attack other men for women would actually repeat the shit you're saying that "the women are physically weaker how dare you". You're one of those homosexuals who swarm the guy for slapping a b***h who slapped him first again because "they're physically weaker bro". You are one of those men that makes things worse.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Improving and not touching your dick won't magically improve women or make them stop acting like c**ts you delusional homosexual, and the men fricking women still watch porn.
            >>I'm such a loser I can't control my horny level so I need dolls for sex because those evil women won't give it to me and they totally deserve to be beaten for denying me
            See[...]
            And stop coping. The men who would use porn or dolls ARE controlling their own sex drives and not bothering your queens by themselves. You're just mad YOU can't control those men's dicks because you're a worthless moron who has zero say in it.

            Keep crying, keep whining, keep staying effeminate while women continue to laugh at your misery tard. You truly do have no clue how pathetic you are in the eyes of most of society nor do you seem to care. A truly failed man in every sense of the word. He just has to have his stupid ass dolls and fake wombs lmao. You act like these men are such helpless victims to female mind control as well like the idiot you are. They aren't that helpless. In fact they know sometimes. They just want a punching bag queer such as yourself to punch on or execute so that they can get their version of a dopamine hit all while further pleasing their woman and having a passionate sex session right after she gets to see how strong her man is for dealing with that pesky incel vermin.

            Mark my words you gays. You guys are mentally broken and on the verge of no point of return. Men are not helpless innocent victims. They are far scummier than females ever will be. If it pleases a woman and gets her wet to see them run through a sorry ass like you, men will do it. Doesn't mean some woman has succubus type mind powers dummy.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You're a prime example of the men who enable all of women's bad behavior by using their physical weakness as an excuse for it. You already live in the world you're scared of happening but you don't care because you are a hopeless simp too easy to manipulate. I hope you get shot trying to defend a roastie from a cop or thug she started shit with like the subhuman you are.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            lol yeah you continue to hate females with every ounce of no strength you have. Seems though like I finally got you to admit that yeah, men are in fact villains. If men enable women then how are these men not far more dangerous to your stink ass? Nah screw you I am done here.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Seems though like I finally got you to admit that yeah, men are in fact villains
            Well you wouldn't call deluded simps like you heroes that's for sure. I never denied there were bad men, you're just a really stupid b***h.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >A truly failed man in every sense of the word
            Coming from someone who prides themselves on defending women even when it doesn't make sense, that doesn't mean much.

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if i got pregnant i'd abort it
    22 weeks is extremely long though, why the frick would you wait that long?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >if i got-ACK

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Does anyone have a way to view that sub, or a link to something similar?
    I wanna fap and am in the mood for some abortion fetish stuff

  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    100% of people pro abortion were not aborted.
    Really activates the almonds.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *