Why do women want the right to abort babies living in artificial wombs?

Why do women want the right to abort babies living in artificial wombs?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Well you know women just love killing babies.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Good. As the saying goes: "sleep is good, death is better, but best is never having been born".

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    they can do a genetic screening to determine if the baby will be tall and have chad facial features. if not, abortion time for the future incel.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You should probably have some level of control if your genetic material is being used to produce another human, but at the same time, I don't see how it can come to that without the woman explicitly asking for it, so I'm not sure why they need abortion rights.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Dr.

    she's just trying to maintain the constant human sacrifice that is abortion. Also companies use aborted fetus tissue for things.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Checked and true, there is a very profitable market for aborted fetuses and it is one of the reasons abortion is so heavely pushed as good and absolutely necessary in paid media

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        well they shouldn't do that. they should bury them and treat them properly

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          that would imply that they were human and not 'just a clump of cells' which is a common argument for abortion.

          also if you kill a pregnant woman you get charged with two counts of murder, if you're doctor preforming an abortion you don't get charged at all.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            well no like they aren't humans yet but you still shouldn't make money off of them
            and that makes sense that it's two murders because if she wasn't going to get an abortion then it would be born so he killed the mother and stopped the baby from being born

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            a woman could be on her way to the clinic to get one only to be killed and the killer would still be charged for two counts of murder. Why the fetus afforded legal protections in one sense but not the other?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            okay I think it's because the fetus has the right to live but the woman has the right to her body. and so for the woman the fetus is breaking her right to control her body like if someone trespassed in your house and so that's why you can abort it
            honestly I can't really remember so you should just look it up

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            roastie cope. bodily autonomy, why does the baby not have any? it has a right not to be murdered before it can even know life.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            how is it cope? would you like it if someone came and stabbed you? or is that cope because bodily autonomy is cope?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            my body my choice is an argument frequently given by roasts for abortion. except it isn't their body that's being harmed, it's the child's. It has a right to not be cut into pieces and sucked out with a vacuum.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            no the child is harming her body. do you even know what pregnancy does to the mother's body?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            if pregnancy is so harmful then why do women willingly carry babies to term now that they have abortion access? why aren't ALL babies aborted?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Because some women aren't quite as evil as other women.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            because some women want to have kids and that's the sacrifice that they CHOOSE to make

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            then it isn't that harmful and should be no issue with modern medicine in having a baby. I could maybe see abortion in limited cases where the mother's life is in actual danger.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            literally every pregnancy puts the mother's life in danger

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Modern medicine is practically unchanged compared to medicine 200 years ago or even 2000 years ago.
            Most advances are in peripheral areas. For example we have cheaper anesthetics, but not better ones. We have more plentiful antibiotics, but not better ones. etc.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Modern medicine is practically unchanged compared to medicine 200 years ago or even 2000 years ago.

            um what? Medicince even a hundred years ago was way different, but before even germ theroy? Come on, it was more prayer and blood letting than anything else.

            In the past dying from childbirth was a real threat, now it's almost unheard of in the west.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >someone said it on a forum somewhere so it must be true!
            read a book, cletus.
            In short, you don't need to know what a germ is to learn cause and effect. "germs" were known about since at least 5k years ago and the exact same protocols were used then as are now to fight them, the only difference is we know what they are now.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            in the past doctors never washed their hands or their tools, they would go from dissecting corpses to delivering babies and then wonder why so many of them died. tell me they had an understanding of germ theory.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Literally wrong on all counts. Stop believing forum posts and read books.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >mr corporation please stop making big money by doing nasty shit and gaslighting people to agree with you doing this please please

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    because having a kid is literally a life changing thing. nobody should be forced to be a parent if they aren't able to provide for the kid

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      anyone able to use an artificial womb is going to be fricking loaded. Poor trailer trash and ghetto prostitutes aren't going to be able to afford them.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Artifical wombs are the most planned out shit there is. You can't force someone to have an artifical womb baby.
      The only reason you'd want to abort it is literally because you dont want someone else to reproduce

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i think people should be aware of that risk when having sex and accept the responsibilities. let alone when you're going out of your way to make a baby in an artificial womb.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No one should have sex if they aren't ready to be a parent

        If you believe these women are so irresponsible and short-sighted, why do you want them to raise children?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No one should have sex if they aren't ready to be a parent

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No it's not. People are the exact same before and after they have kids

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Then don't have sex.
      Simple as dumb prostitute

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wouldn't the men be the ones using an artificial womb though? How do women even come into play here?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        A man's purpose is to provide for veganas, whether through monetary means, labour, or entertainment value of his suffering.
        AWT goes against man's divinely ordained place in life and is thus anathema. Every based&trad Straight White Man agrees with this.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >woman sells her eggs as a 20 year old for more money to party with
    >finds out later a non-chad has bought them and plans to make his children with them
    >reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee I should be able to abort it!

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How does the embryo get into the artificial womb without the woman agreeing?
    Also, this isn't really new, the Japs were doing it with sheep or goats nearly 30 years ago.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I assume its in case of severe defects and shit like downs syndrome.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      but that's ableist! downies have rights too!

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Awesome. This would facilitate great fertility clinics in my hypothetical queer city

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How is this going to work? Do men just get to have kids without a woman now?
    As much as I dislike women, a mother and a father are both essential to healthy development of a child. Yes, even if the mother and father are mentally fricked it's probably(?) still better than having none

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      likely this

      >find woman willing to sell her eggs
      >mix in father's sperm until egg is fertilized
      >transfer to artificial womb

      no different than current rent a womb suuragte mothers, except now there's no need for a physical woman. Also this lets women still have children and keep their looks, and most importantly still work 100% of the time.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But women don't want to play anymore. What else is there? Men will go their own way.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    adjusted murder rates including abortion put women as the most prolific killers in mankind's history, greatly outnumbering even deaths caused by all wars, combined. women LOVE killing babies OP. not just their own babies, but all babies in general.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Men should have the right to abort women to even out the dispute

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i'm from an artificial wound though i was born from a vegana - i feel that shit anon

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The only reason women have a right to abortion now is because of bodily autonomy, if its not in their body anymore then they get no say. weird af

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Oh noes!1!1 How will the wimminz conduct their satanic rituals now??!?!!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *