Women fail at simple test

What are the implications of this and why are they so moronic?

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    sage

    >bonus hole thread
    sneed

    Complete and total WORK BOYCOTT

    With the recent events in *insert random globohomosexual psyop location here* we are seeing that somebody is desperate for you to react without thinking, but let me suggest, that this time we should think without acting.

    We should not give in to their provocation, instead we should do something very simple but also effective:
    - stop complying
    - stop working

    They rely on you to get up everyday and give your ENERGY and ATTENTION to THEM

    What would happen if you took it away from them?

    What would happen if people would say "no more" tomorrow and instead of going to work, just stayed home?

    What would happen if tomorrow, people would, instead of caring about another false flag, another psyop, MSM sensationalism and horror stories, say "you know what, today I'm doing something that benefits me and family only. Something for me, for us, something I WANT."?

    SINCE YOU WERE A CHILD THEY CONDITIONED YOU IN "EDUCATION" TO SIT DOWN, SHUT UP AND DO WHAT YOU ARE TOLD.

    WHAT WOULD HAPPEN IF EVERYONE JUST STOPPED WORKING, LAID DOWN THEIR TOOLS, SHUT DOWN THE MACHINES AND WENT HOME TODAY?

    think of all the good stuff you could do if you didn't go to work! tell your friends and family!
    - read a book
    - exercise
    - cook a nice meal
    - take a walk in the forest
    - work on your car, bike, etc.
    - Get tools and fix your house
    - Get tools and build something if you have space
    - Clean the house more thoroughly
    - play dakar rally sim mode
    - Learn self sufficency skills. Fishing, hunting/butchering, plant identification, firearm proficency, farming.
    - Make my own clothes
    - Make little things to make gifts freely

    please anons give a suggestion what you would do on your well deserved free day, or week if you want!

    it's very simple friends. don't riot, don't go to work, just stay at home because you're "sick". just for a week or two. and don't forget to tell your friends and family!!!

    >More info
    archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/449717456

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Sure. Are you going to give me the money to cook meals or rent a house?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah for few days. Until u need a tank of gas or food. Suddenly, having a job and getting paid seems like a damned good idea once you’ve correctly assessed the situation.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's because women haven't had access to education until recently.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You don't even need education to solve this, fricking moron.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You can estimate. While the surface is going to be horizontal, the level will be dependent on the volume and the angle of the bottle. Will the surface be above or below the left side base corner? You’ll have to calculate the area of the liquid- assuming there are no variations in thickness of the glass and that all vertical lines are parallel to each other.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >That's because women haven't had access to education until recently.
      >women historically have never poured anything out of a bottle
      that's how dumb you sound

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Modern women don't pour you bigot.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >That's because women haven't had access to education until recently.
      homie are you moronic? A 5 year old BOY could figure this shit out.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        counter point, what if its a niglet?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Humans didn't exist until recently. A woman only needs a vegana to survive. They aren't selected for intelligence.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      education doesnt teach you how to think, you stupid redditor Black.

      It is IN-TUITIVE - aka it is already within you and you use it because your brain/mind gives you answers. It is called innate intelligence.

      And this, in a (diz)nut-shell the difference between education and intelligence. You and most women are educated, but not intelligent. There are also intelligent but uneducated men who still have more "knows" due to them correctly applying their intelligence.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous
        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          no

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            you clearly fell for the obvious bait post and your intuition didn't help you.
            It is a reference to how the liberals are coping with the Black stupidity

    • 3 weeks ago
      White Knight

      This... and yet chuds will deny that misogyny is harmful...

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Stuff like this is the kind of thing that very briefly brings out the “awww they’re a little bit dim, I should protect them” instinct in me, until I remember what women choose to do with sex and relationships and then I remember that women should be raised as breeding cattle on ranches without language or education.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Sage and report incel threads

        You sound bitter

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The woman super organism that requires several generations of education before it collectively remembers it (not unlike the holocaust)

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Kitchens are full of bottle with liquids in them, you idiot. If anything women should be more likely to understand this problem than men.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      nice bait abbo meth/12

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Get off your VPN you stupid fricking monkey

      You don't even need education to solve this, fricking moron.

      Trips of truth

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It’s been over 100 years

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'd ask, what women and at what colleges? Because women, in theory, still have an average IQ of 100, and even a 70 should be able to figure this out, provided they are literate enough to understand the directions. That's the only thing keeping me from concluding that everyone who's ever drank out of a glass or a bottle should be able to figure this out.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      In theory, but in practice, women are completely moronic and incompetent. We have different brains.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        White women are still more competent than ethnic men.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >90% accuracy
        >10% for the trans community
        Proof that transgender is real

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        All the shit we have to pretend is real like diversity being a strength or men and women being equal in capabilities is just a forced social dogma because women get offended by the reality and men capitulate to their fickle hormone brains because pussy.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        why only 90%. this would mean that 10% of the brains in men and women can not be identified as male or female. hm.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      IQ tests actually did used to favor men heavily, but in the name of "equality", the tests were remade and retooled in a way so that both sexes would have the same score on average, mainly by increasing/weighing linguistics more. When it comes to visual-spacial reasoning, men are better. You see this in all target-related sports like shooting and darts.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        they cant even throw. they delusionally think they can though for some reason. then fling it backwards to land just behind them

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      A 70 IQ person would be like "But there is no water in the second bottle. I doan unnerstan"

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nonwhite prostitutes who failed at high school then went on to DeVry trade school after their GED program who cannot process real questions because they're still morons.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The truth of the matter is that a woman can learn complex and intricate skills or vocations.
      But it doesn't matter how high her IQ is or if she's a doctor, women in general are moronic when it comes to common sense.
      So it doesn't matter if they are in the top percentage of intelligent or successful women there's a certain moron factor that is inherently in their biology

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >even a 70 should be able to figure this out

      nope... 70 is too low for that

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah 70 iq people eat poop and shit in the street some are even known to be bloody bastards

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >women, in theory, still have an average IQ of 100
      women, BY DEFINITION, still have an average IQ of 100
      It's not based on empirical evidence that was gathered from an objective test. It was literally simply defined to be equal.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Because women, in theory, still have an average IQ of 100
      all but 2 are moronic. consensus seeking, lying to each other, blaming society and men the entire time despite the activity being a competition among THEMSELVES

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But there are different aspects of general intelligence, and spatial intelligence is only one of them. I wouldn't be too surprised if very good spatial orientation is not a part of the genetic package of most women. What use did they have for it, in their evolutionary past of berry-picking and childbearing? Whereas for men, when the tribe of Bog comes over the hilltop and starts clubbing your people, the tribe of Og, you had damn better be able to aim a rock or a spear, and make a very accurate swing of your stone axe into the head of a Bogian.

      It's also the case that israelites are below average in spatial ability, despite otherwise high IQ. And women are the israelites of gender, so...

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this is literally the sign that theyre unable to see reality as is. it doesnt matter if they had evolutional use for it or not. this is actually pretty big. women are fricking morons.
        were doomed.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you can figure that out, good luck.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >women, in theory, still have an average IQ of 100
      women, BY DEFINITION, still have an average IQ of 100
      It's not based on empirical evidence that was gathered from an objective test. It was literally simply defined to be equal.

      There are two bell curves for IQ. The one for males is shifted to the right and is broader, while the one for females is shifted to the left and taller.
      Women are literally a midwit hivemind. But every published paper "adjusts" female IQ to be equal to male IQ because anything else would be "problematic"
      Pretty much the same for racial IQ... you're literally not allowed to acknowledge any differences

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    counterfactual thinking does not come naturally to npcs

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Women have little to no spatial reasoning. Essentially they were drug from cave to cave by they’re hair hence the need for a fat ass. The ability to navigate from cave to cave exists solely in the male brain.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dragged, not dug.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Dagged, not gug.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Women are emotion-brained, and on every question they take in every test they take they're constantly thinking about "what does the quiz giver want me to answer," rather than "what is reality."
    This problem is like a litmus test for them, and makes their brains short out. The ones who get it wrong think "they want me to show what happens when I pour out the water." And so they draw a nonsensical waterline going up towards the mouth of the bottle and pouring out. They know it's not spatially reasonable, but chalk it up to you, the test giver, drawing the bottle wrong.
    Man almost always answer spacial tests like this with what they think would happen if they observed it, your intentions be damned, they are going to draw or answer what happens.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Men have straight forward thinking
      Women are scatter brains

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Women are scatter brains
        Their corpus callosum is 30% larger than a man's, giving greater processing power but spreading it across both halves. They're literal scatterbrains and there's physical proof to back it up.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >giving greater processing power
          It isn't greater processing power so much as more cross hemisphere neuron activity. Men have more single hemisphere neuron activity than women. The same amount of processing power used in two different ways.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yep, correct. It's equivalent just spread around seemingly haphazardly. Know that and a lot of female behavior starts making a lot more sense.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            So true. Especially their awful stories that go nowhere.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Look up the theory of the bicameral mind. Women are basically lesser schizos

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Very well said

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That’s a pretty interesting hypothesis

      15 minutes / 7 km = 2.14km/hr

      Wrong. They want km/h not km/m

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      why do women call us stupid for that. our civilization literally got destroyed because of this.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    most people get the picrel question wrong including white men
    I don't want morons reproducing in general

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thats easy, Its 35 mph

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I would argue that you are way more moronic if you get op's test wrong.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      28.333 km/h

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        how did you get the .333

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >ou get the .333

          trip to 26.66 km/h
          +
          trip back 30 km/h
          =
          (56.66 km/h) /2

          you get 28.33 km/h
          im bad at math am i moronic?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes my brain works like yours and we are moronic (but I’m not as moronic as you).
            However let’s say you did a 100km trip @ 100kms/hr + a 1km trip at 20kms/hr, the answer wouldn’t be (100+20)/2.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Oh I see. I calculated it differently, I went for 7 km in 15 minutes -> 28kmh
            Is it a rounding error am I moronic

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I’m sure you’re good at other things

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You can't do it like that. Either do total distance divided by total time or if you want to do the math with km/h you'll have to do a harmonic mean

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >am i moronic?

            Mildly. Just add up the total distance traveled, and divide by the total time spent.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Oh I see. I calculated it differently, I went for 7 km in 15 minutes -> 28kmh
        Is it a rounding error am I moronic

        The 0.33 is a rounding error. The answer is 28km/hr.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Oh I see. I calculated it differently, I went for 7 km in 15 minutes -> 28kmh
          Is it a rounding error am I moronic

          It isn't a rounding error, you get 28.33 if you calculate the average speed of the trips instead of the average speed of the trip. One takes into account the difference in time traveled at the speed relative to the total time traveling and the other doesn't.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            This, you have to take into account the distance AND time were shorter on the second route. For total average speed

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What? So if you are correct, at 28.33 km/h and riding for the total 15 min, she would have travelled 7.0825 km. Where did the extra 0.0825 km com from?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If you average the trips, the speed is 28.33, but the trip durations aren't the same, so you have to weight each one by how much of the total time spent traveling they account for. Doing this produces the same result as combining the distances and dividing by the total time.

            4/9*9/15 + 3/6*6/15= 7/15

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      7 McDouble per pedal pushed

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Total distance divided by total time. There's nothing you need to know here except the definition of "average speed".

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      28km/h

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I hate this shit that seems easy at first glance, there is always something that fricks me

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      um ... 6 minutes plus 9 minutes is 15 minutes

      that's only a quarter of an hour

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      why doesn't she just check the speedometer? isn't that why she got the damn thing?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      speedy granny
      I'd give her a kudos on strava

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      17.398 mph

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Are you seriously telling me npcs don't know d=vt?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      since the problem states her home is 4km away from the river, her finding a 3km route means she must have found some kind of warp in spacetime that would allow her to path to her house from the river in only 3km. however, this would also have time dilation effects, meaning the answer to this problem is going to depend on relativity, which you could calculate but I don't feel like it. also the answer doesn't states who's time we are measuring here, hers or an external observer - so you would probably need to give 2 answers here to cover those 2 solutions.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >bike paths go as the crow flies

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you fail at reading comprehension

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          it says the destination is 4km away not that path is 4km long

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah wow, whoever wrote the problem is actually moronic. They changed from distance between to two points to the distance of the path taken.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Based autistic moron

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      26.25

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      15 minutes / 7 km = 2.14km/hr

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        how much distance does a person cover in an hour at that speed, how much distance would they cover in 15 minutes instead?

        26.25

        crazy response

        17.398 mph

        funny

        28.333 km/h

        crazy that youre so close to the answer despite being insane

        Thats easy, Its 35 mph

        amazing response

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I did it two different ways because I thought there might be a trick with the two differing trips, but nope it really is as simple as total distance over time traveled multiplied by whatever you need to get to 60 minutes.

      >ou get the .333

      trip to 26.66 km/h
      +
      trip back 30 km/h
      =
      (56.66 km/h) /2

      you get 28.33 km/h
      im bad at math am i moronic?

      The error was that you forgot to account for the fact that the trip back only took up 2/5 of the time on the trip.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I think it's 28 by doing 7/0.25
      However I know the right answer for these situations is to take the harmonic mean but I'm too lazy right now to see if the result would be the same because I really think it would be

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The right answer is to divide total distance by total time.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You can do harmonic mean of km/h as well

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, if you don't know the definition of "average velocity", I guess you could do that...

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            There you fricking Black person

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      travelled 7km in 15 minutes.
      7x 4 = 28?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      position was the same at the start and end
      d=Δp
      d=0

      v=d/t
      v=0/t
      v=0

      she averaged 0km/h

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Total distance divided by total time. There's nothing you need to know here except the definition of "average speed".

        That's velocity, not speed, morons.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      28.33 km/h

      fight me

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If the river is 4 km away, she can’t take a 3 km route without quantum tunneling, which she can’t do with her bicycle.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You can take a more meandering scenic route one way, or a more direct route that would be faster.
        15 mins to go 7km, so in 60 mins she'd go 28km using that same average speed.
        So the answer is 28km/h, and if you can't sort this out you might be kinda dumb.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The answer is that Helen should be beaten for leaving the house without a male chaperone and for operating complex machinery meant for men.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      She rode 7 km per quarter hour, so 28 km/h

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >travels 7 km in 15 minutes
      >60min / 15min = 4
      >7km * 4 = 28km/h

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      28 kph

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Be honest, did you get this question right?
    If not, you have no business trying to clown on "midwits"

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The answer is 28, right? Basic math

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        thats what I got, 26+30=56/2

        Be honest, did you get this question right?
        If not, you have no business trying to clown on "midwits"

        A

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      D

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      A? I didn't bother trying to vizualise all pieces, but at least the ones I was thinking about would fit A (the easiest pieces i guess)

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      can't be B, the shape at the top of leftmost is missing entirely
      can't be C, the triangle in leftmost is not the same dimensions
      A and D are mirrored copies of each other
      so since the largest shape in leftmost is the back, and we are looking at the shape from the front, then the shape at the top of leftmost is always fat on the right side
      assuming mirroring isn't allowed (which means A and D are both correct), the answer is D

      wait i'm wrong.
      the answer is not B.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        A and D are not the same. Look at the highest point of A in the figure, it comes to a point. If you rotate D to be in the same position, a flat plane is the highest point.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It has to be a
      All other choice done Line up

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I wanna say B. My cope is the scale is weird from the shape to the 2d pic.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      depends on which way you fold it, a/d

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        nvm its d
        the landing for the ramp, the thin part of the fat L shape that touches the triangle is too thin/out of proportion

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        D

        Question, wouldn't d be incorrect since that 5-sided yous shape doesn't fit on that one?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Ignore me I'm dumb and didn't look close enough

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this
        If A and D are mirror of each other, then you can fold up to form one and fold down to form the other

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          almost.... but i realized after they're slightly different in

          nvm its d
          the landing for the ramp, the thin part of the fat L shape that touches the triangle is too thin/out of proportion

          the ramp in a or the width of the pentagon is too thick so the proportion of that little ledge is off on A
          shapewise they're basically the same so the difference is really subtle

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      D

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's D, use the top of the shape, the L-ish shaped piece to start. The only part that is misleading is the abnormally shaped bit next to the triangle, but it isn't actually connected directly to it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The Answer is A, facing the rest of the shape from the pentagram we can see the indentation for the ramp is on the left rather than the right.
      If you want to cheat it, you can just see that B is obviously wrong while the only difference between C and D is the ramp's length, which the testmakers wouldn't have intended to be the deciding factor.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Pic for clarity. The red area, which is to the right when viewing from the arrow's direction, should be larger.

        [...]
        By drawing the waterline at the same level you are infarct being exact and also wrong. The test is whether you can correctly figure out that the water level changes and roughly by how much.

        The test was actually if you realized it would be level relative to the Earth.
        Women tended to draw the waterline parallel to the bottom of the glass instead.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Pic for clarity. The red area, which is to the right when viewing from the arrow's direction, should be larger.
        [...]
        The test was actually if you realized it would be level relative to the Earth.
        Women tended to draw the waterline parallel to the bottom of the glass instead.

        Heh.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          [...]
          I probably should have posted this instead.

          wtf lol

          paper autist, what else can you make?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      Heh.

      I probably should have posted this instead.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        your efforts have not gone unnoticed

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        holy shit

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        where did the main arrow/barn part go?
        the nearest to the bottom left in your cut out. looks too sharp to be the mangled D.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        [...]
        Heh.

        go bac to /po/

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Going with D

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm gearing into A. D is the only other possibility but in my mind's eye putting the base rectangle flat down doesn't result in the fat L piece being in the correct position.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this is the most moronic test question I've ever seen

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      too easy frick off

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      A and D. Both are just mirrors of each other. You can go from one to the other by reversing every fold.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you are in a position of hiring, make a simple entrance exqm test including several such questions

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >moronic
    They are not. They are like children or Black folk, they really don't know right from wrong and that is where it was supposed to be the mans job to lead, to teach them. Should I get mad at you or your dog if your dog digs a hole in my yard?
    See what I mean?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      found the simp

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    women are supposed to be moronic. their only use is their holes.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    New INCEL thread just dropped!

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wait, so the answer to this is basically any horizontal line, and not one that perfectly shows the volume in the right spot?

    lmao

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I tried this with my wife the other day, the last time this thread was posted. She actually got it right, albeit after maybe 15s of thinking. Considering how bad she is with spacial skills, it speaks volumes for how bad women actually are.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    easy, next

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Show hitlussy

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      breasts or GTFO you know the fricking rules.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Show boobs.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      t. female

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I too was browsing 9gag last night.
    I asked my wife to do this with the bottom cropped out.
    Happy she's not in the 40%

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How close am I?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You might be a woman..

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So hear me out
        The bottle itself has only been tilted, they haven't moved it up or down in the image, so would the water not line up on both planes?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          How close am I?

          The water level rises.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Sorry forgot my crude visual proof.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >implying people who don't intuitively understand that the water level will rise can understand your proof

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            THEY EXPECT ONE OF US IN THE WRECKAGE, SISTER!!

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        moron

        How close am I?

        100%

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You're going to troon out at some point.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Silence moron

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            AI generated

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Debunked: This image has been doctored by flat earthers to not show curvature

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            unmercartor the curve, this is 210 iq tier, when you can figure out that earth is...yea well. i can not talk about this.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It’s not going to be the same elevation.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And if the bottle was on its side, do you figure it'd have the same water level?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      correct. except the line on the right bottle would be higher.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      THE BOTTLE COOKS THE WATER
      t: co/ck/

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      water still being leveled is an iq90 test... getting the volume to be the same is 110 IQ test.
      Since the bottle is tilted the height of the new line will be higher

      not even 100, maybe 95

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Work backwards from the right image. Do you expect the water level to be nearly half full in an upright bottle?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >line
      You are a college girl, show breasts.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      post breasts

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      homie srsly

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      every responder is an autist. you're close enough for this test. women are shockingly off

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I got this also

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Yeahh I see it's D now after other anons answered. The size of the L's fatness was messing me up. I think you can actually get better at this, since (at least it felt like) I was better when I was making cosplay.

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    women don't have good visual spatial brains
    why they shouldn't be pilots, surgeons and it's why they get paid so poorly as sportsball players

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Easy. Am I going to graduate now?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Class

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Bravo Motherfricker
      BRAVO

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      under8d

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is way more fricked up than you think!!
    Its not about getting the waterline at the correct height, its about understanding that the water is still horizontal when the bottle is tilted!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      water still being leveled is an iq90 test... getting the volume to be the same is 110 IQ test.
      Since the bottle is tilted the height of the new line will be higher

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Since the bottle is tilted the height of the new line will be higher
        How do you know? Tilt it enough and it will be lower.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Tilt it enough and it will be lower.
          Yes but you have an example of the bottle being tilted as a specific angle so you can draw you water line based on that. Its irrelevant what the waterline would be in other examples.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >but you have an example of the bottle being tilted as a specific angle so you can draw you water line based on that
            You know the water level should be higher at a glance, but how do you justify it? How did you know? You can do some geometry and actually prove it, but that's not how you knew.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >but how do you justify it?
            The answer is self-evident. I can simply see that there's less water in B if I draw the waterline at the same level and raise it a bit until it feels correct.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            And I can simply see that if you put a mark at the original water level and in the horizontal middle of the bottle, then tilt the bottle so that this mark is right above the corner that touches the table, water level will be as high as it can go. I'm not 100% sure I see correctly, but I can see it. Isn't it odd, simply seeing things? Why can't women simply see?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you pulled that out of your ass

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Draw a line
      >draws 6 lines
      you are a college girl, show breasts

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >can't follow basic directions
      OOF my dude

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The high IQ genius answer is that fluids don't work in 2 dimensional spaces according to the Navier-Stokes equations, which renders this test just as gay and moronic as the college women supposedly failing it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's a solid 115 IQ answer that will win you many updoots on reddit.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        My IQ is 180 though and I have a Master's in computational engineering. Would you like to discuss differentiable manifolds?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Engineer yourself out of permanent virginity, nurd.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      hey super genius, the answer for this particular problem is very simple

      [...]
      not even 100, maybe 95

      you are nowhere near as smart as you say you are

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This test was originally devised by Piaget, for CHILDREN. Also the questions specifically states that the representation in question is a bottle with water in it.

      And yet adult undergraduate women fail this same test, at substantial rates.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Bullshit.
      t. actual engineer

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not an engineer and I don't know what "2D water" is supposed to mean, but I'm pretty sure that if your container's internal volume is only one water molecule thin, your water won't water properly.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >What is "circling around each other"?
          I'm pretty sure you're a woman or of color.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Oh, I see. You dumb fricking ape. I'm talking about the way the molecules would interact with the surface of the container.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's not 2D if it's "one molecule thin", moron.

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    By drawing the waterline at the same level you are infarct being exact and also wrong. The test is whether you can correctly figure out that the water level changes and roughly by how much.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the correct answer is a horizontal line relative to the earth
      As long as they can just do that it is marked as correct

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    screencap, no effort, woman bait

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Easy. Women have less of a concept of abstract thought than men. It's why they require constant, point-blank explanations for things that men just inherently know. "Why are you being quiet? Why didn't you ask his friend about his divorce? Why do men love digging holes?" It's just shit dudes do. Meanwhile women won't do anything without a valid explanation or excuse. "We're drinking because it's a baby shower. I slept with him because I was drunk. I bought these shoes because they're cute."
    The same applies to minorities versus whites. You see all the time blacks say "Why the white man always climbing mountains and shit? There's nothing up there." Because they don't possess the abstract thought required to understanding doing things that don't directly benefit you.

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >40% of college age women got it wrong
    This is worse than it sounds - because there are effectively only 3 possible answers!
    Remember to vote goyim

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Question is sexist and Racist, women don't drink cologne or whiskey

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What women often do for this test is draw the water pouring out.
    This is because their brain is considering the social utility of turning a container sideways. They're thinking of "why would this happen when it comes to the people around me."

    Although, the fact they don't realize it's a spatial reasoning test and can't discern the context of the actual test shows how carelessly they think.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Blue-pilled take. What women actually do most often is visualize Chad tilting the bottle to drink from it, but they are too focused on imaginary Chad's jaw to visualize the water level correctly.

  31. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Listen, chud, they did eat breakfast so what’s the point of your stupid question?

  32. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I performed this test on my mom and she easily passed it without hesitation.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      menopause turns prostitutes into boys

  33. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What this tells me is that female brains are not taking that extra step in reasoning necessary to solve the problem. This has very serious implications in everything, but especially politics. Women are gullible.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >What this tells me is that female brains are not taking that extra step in reasoning necessary to solve the problem.
      What "reasoning" did you use?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      97 % of all ppl alive today are literally morons, you should know by now

  34. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The phase state of the water has not been defined. Question cannot be answered with certainty.

  35. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm not sure I believe this. Yeah, women tend to be mechanically moronic, but failing this would indicate a complete and utter lack of common sense and basic reasoning skills.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >lack of commence sense and basic reasoning skills
      You just explained a woman

      Kitchens are full of bottle with liquids in them, you idiot. If anything women should be more likely to understand this problem than men.

      >kitchen
      The saddest part about that is the fact that almost all famous, top and Michelin chefs are men kek

  36. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you wanted to do the autistic answer, how would you do it? After calculating the area for "A", how you you transfer that to "B"? A triangle doesn't work.

  37. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So many smooth brains. The water level will not rise. Someone showed you this prior and you are still saying the level rises.

    AV=D/t

  38. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I was able to turn a leftist woman into a israelite hater. All I did was explain why things are the way they are and why there are all the problems in the world. She went down a rabbit hole and ended up going far ahead of what I was telling her, looking things up on her own and arguing with friends and people online. It *really* upset her and she'd constantly tell me how much she hates israelites.

    She also called herself a feminist and one day we were talking about women and I said womens' hormones really affect them and they can't handle shit because of it. Society made their lives easier because of it but they really fricked themselves over by fighting to get it just as hard as men. Men have harder lives because they can handle it. Women can't handle shit and will stress for years about minor annoyances men don't even think about.

    She could believe everything I told her about israelites- and she was starting to believe the truth about Black folk on her own- but she couldn't believe what I told her about women and after that she never talked to me again.

  39. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is a joke right? One of those tricks questions?
    When it's talking about the level of the water it should be relative to the bottle...

  40. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What do i win?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      underrated

  41. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, good mocking, they don't say how much time has to pass before the water state is captured for how it would look like.

  42. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    do it in your head polack!!!

  43. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Question to all mathanons.
    If the shape of the bottle in the third dimension would be kind square instead of round, would the horizontal level of water (when it's tilted) change?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      its liquid so no it takes the optimal form to fill it
      it would change the level of the liquid depending on the area

  44. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    try asking them about speed and distance.
    >if we were travelling at 100mph, how long would it take to travel 75 miles?

  45. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'll literally ask an 11 yo. Hold on guys

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I also asked my girlfriend.
      My girlfriend might be a man, she got it right

  46. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What's even the supposed source of this info? Reverse image only gets you ifunny and twitter threads from sexists using it as 'proof' of muh superiority.

  47. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just screenshotted and gave it to my gf. Here’s her answer

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Had to get his "g/f" to solve it
      How embarrassment

  48. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So what the frick do they draw the water line as? How would you get this wrong?

  49. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    a=2(1/2 h * b) = b*h

    I get that women are functionally-moronic, but at this point even the densest of normies can't help but notice that there's a serious fricking problem at hand.
    Oh, well, let's ~~*racemix our way out of this competency crisis*~~, my fellow goyim.

  50. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They don't pour enough beer.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *