Women led German political talk show asks:

Can Ukraine still win the war?

Answer: Only if Ukraine commits to the totaler Krieg (TM) (total war) and fight bis zum letzten Mann (TM) (fights to the last man).

Why are Germans hellbend to win the war and win every km2 back including Crimea by military means? That is virtually imposdible absent millions of dead.

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    revoke women's rights. NOW!

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why do women who don't fight in wars are talking about sending men to fight and die in wars?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I think it is a Chad thing. They know Chads survive, betas die.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Artillery fire is fairly indiscriminory in that regard

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Chads survive shells, beta just duck and cover

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It’s implied Chad is smart enough to avoid doing something dumb like going to war for a society that spits on him

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >hurrrburrdurrr Chad-Beta Alpha-Omega
        stfu women have no place and no say on such matters. A man very much understands this. An evolutionary internet monkey does not. And it's not killing off "the Betas", whatever tf that even is in your mind, war is just simply killing all men left right and center, artilleries don't care about how Chad you feel. And all that is for no reason whatsoever, a piece of clay in Ukraine, Russia was provoked into this situation. As if Russia is ever going to lose those territories now. These women have no understanding of war and can only escalate the situation.

  3. 1 month ago
    the leaf of concordia

    y do german woman look like trannies

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    One in the middle is pretty cute, would take as war bride

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Anna Zaitseva has a hilariously large nose

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        that is not human

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You now know why women have no place in politics.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because Germany is a vassal state of the American empire and we are hell bent on throwing everyone we possibly can at Russia to maintain control over the money laundering pit known as Ukraine.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    ~~*They*~~ want to buy up the Ukrainian farmland which Ukraine will be forced to sell off after all the loans it took to fund the war. WW3 will be fought over food more than anything else.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If they throw every male they have at Russia then who will be left to help repopulate their nation?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I will selflessly volunteer my time and my seed while only asking compensation for living expenses.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I unironically think they believe „the good German man“ will move to Ukraine to take care of the poor young Ukrainian women and make the land Germanic.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    you euro's better fricking pray no women are involved in any meaningful way in the planning and implementation of military tactics

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    2,3,1

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why don't Germans just speak in English like a normal person?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Why don't Americans just speak English like a normal person?

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I assume the average "current thing" npc doesn't know German and American companies cohencidentally struck a deal for 20-30% of Ukraines cropfields after their israelite puppet was installed via IMF loans

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >totaler Krieg
    The cheapest option was to provide everything that was needed in the 1 year of war, and not create a circus of bureaucracy, and time for poo-teen to recover

    So far, the collective West has not been able to provide even 1/3 of what it declared. If there were 5 times more soldiers, this would not solve the problem.

    As Zaluzhny said - this is a technological war, and it is precisely the technology that the West is holding back

    So I feel like this could drag on for another 5 years, easily.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      > So I feel like this could drag on for another 5 years, easily.

      More like 20yrs

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      thats nice, back to the trenches with you

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >aiieee where are my free gibs
      >you need to support our war but also have no say in how long we fight it

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Not quite so, my friend, the problem is that the West declares its support at official level - and declares certain goals, but does not take the actions that imply the fulfillment of these goals.

        Timely and sufficient supplies of weapons are the measure of the West’s desire to end this war as quickly as possible - this has been the case from the very beginning.

        In general, it would be much more convenient for the West if we lost QUICKLY and they would then express condemnation. But our resistance to the invader showed that there would be no “quick” here. From that moment on, the only way out was quick deliveries of everything we needed - but it turned out to be too difficult

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Zaluzhny said
      >traitor who fled to London

      Fricking kek

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Precisely this. Besides, if Ukraine falls, Russians will not stop there, so this is basically the war for Europe's survival.

      We are all actively trying to overthrow any and all political forces that try to make peace with Russia in any way, shape or form, but the glowBlack folk are tricky, they pretend to be on your side, only to avoid taking decisive steps when it counts.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Russia can have every country where I can't distinguish the average citizen from a Russian by sight or sound. That's practically all of Eastern Europe.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        > Hey guys can you please stop ethnically cleansing these 2 95% Russian areas of your country or else we'll just take them
        > Ok we've taken them can we do peace please
        > THE MADMAN WANTS TO MARCH ON FRANCE
        Why are zogbots like this?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Anon, I....

      Have a look at Libya, Iraq and Syria. They did exactly to you what they did to them. Prop up insurgencies, ferment civil insurgency, stage coup.

      They did the same thing with you, with the same outcome.
      >prop up azov (mccain, nuland, et al.)
      >NGO's along with kolomoysky media network prop up anti russian sentiment
      >euromaidan coup 2014

      It was never about winning, it was about testing the waters at the outskirts of it's empire. This one backfired bad though.

      Again, if the West (the US) had any interest in the wellbeing of Ukraine and its people, they would've befriended Russia as it emerged after collapse of the USSR, for the good of Europe, Russia, USA, and most importantly Ukraine.
      Ukraine could have been a top-tier country as a trade hub between the main powers, but cooperation, diplomacy and compromise was never on the table for the US. It was all or nothing, and Ukraine just happened to be caught in the middle.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Have a look at Libya, Iraq and Syria. They did exactly to you what they did to them. Prop up insurgencies, ferment civil insurgency, stage coup.
        Sorry anon, I can't read this kind of narratives seriously anymore.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Then you must be really lost. I doubt you're Ukrainian, but do you not see yourself in a similar situation as the middle eastern quagmire? How do you differ from Syria or Libya, apart from geography and demography?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Then you must be really lost. I doubt you're Ukrainian, but do you not see yourself in a similar situation as the middle eastern quagmire? How do you differ from Syria or Libya, apart from geography and demography?

          i.e., a failed state that's become a hot potato no one's really willing to catch. I wish it wasn't so, but it is.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          you are human capital. countries use taxpayer money to pay our military complex and then in return via ringtausch move milequipment to your country. we do everything to "technically" not be a warparty to not trigger NATO bündnisfall, because realtalk nobody wants to have war in their fricking country and in the end everybody hopes, that whatever goes on around your area, ends in your area. cruel world, but thats what it is. btw. since you are not NATO we "technically" dont owe you anything.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      5 years? Can Ukraine's manpower hold out for even 2 years?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      NATO war machines are expensive, Ukrainians are cheap

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      If you aren't just shitposting, you are completely delusional. This was never going to end any other way.
      >this could drag on for another 5 years, easily.
      5 months more like. And the longer it takes, the more irreversibly fricked Ukraine is going to be.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Why do you you these people care about you, although the same people despise their own country and people

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >the technology that the West is holding back
      The West doesn't have any technology.
      It started deindustrializing in 1968 and ironically enough NATO helped start this policy when they were responsible for helping create the environmental group The Club of Rome.
      After the fall of the USSR in 1991 Western and NATO defence policy was built around the idea that there was no threat to the West and no chance of conventional wars but if there was, nuclear weapons would prevent them.
      Otherwise they only needed small militaries to deal with insurgencies so out went the ability to make things like artillery shells.
      What conventional weapons the West has are just enough for training, existing allies in the developing world, and a stockpile for emergencies.
      Did anyone in Ukrainian intelligence or NATO actually try to work out how much materiel would be required each day for a conventional war, how much was available, and how much could be manufactured?
      This information was all readily available.
      Britain has a grand total of 150 tanks and they would take months to get them all ready if needed.
      They don't have the capacity to built new tanks. The new Challenger 3 will take years to be ready and will consist of not even building a new tank but refurbishing the old challenger. Some of that work will be done in Germany.
      Britain can't even build a new infantry fighting vehicle.
      The Ajax IFV has been in prototype stage for nearly ten years and they still don't have a working version.
      Britain built 28,000 tanks during World War Two.
      Those days are long over.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They need to send in the Germans. Germany is still too white and has a high risk of turning into the Nazi party once more. Only until millions of German men are sent to the front lines can the minorities in Germany gain a foothold and turn the white tide in Germany.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Send 2 million Germans against Russia and this time we end up with Lebensraum.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Lol at Germoids with no sense of irony. No wonder they’re so brainwashed. The most hamfisted political puppet show scripted to the T with bad acting will come off in their eyes as a spirited discussions.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      These political talk shows are big in Germany. They are now very Nazi—like, for instance they praised the Nazi Asov brigades yesterday.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Who cares about shlick material for wannabe lonely wannabe intellectual wamen and basedboys lol

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Women shouldn't have opinions on war

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Why not? If their opinions are correct, why wouldn't they have a right to voice them?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >If their opinions are correct
        not possible. Only someone who's fought on the ground can have an opinion on war, let alone be "correct". whatever being correct even means

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Kek, how long until they start handing out white feathers

      This

      Why not? If their opinions are correct, why wouldn't they have a right to voice them?

      have a nice day simp

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    German TV is the most moronic shitshow imaginable. Driven to a level of dumbness beyond believe. They oppress the whole country to earn billions a year wich is consumed by pensions and management. What you see is the cheap rest. The vomit of .ass parasites consumed by nursing cases of every kind (usually above the age where to to die honorable).

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      > German TV is the most moronic shitshow imaginable.
      yes
      >Driven to a level of dumbness beyond believe.
      yes

      >They oppress the whole country to earn billions a year wich is consumed by pensions and management.
      yes

      >What you see is the cheap rest. The vomit of .ass parasites consumed by nursing cases of every kind (usually above the age where to to die honorable).
      you don‘t understand, the funny thing about these Maischberger like talk shows, is that even Göbbels was less radical than these people now. Their mantra is der totale Krieg all the time.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    why the frick are women even allowed to talk about war?

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Why are Germans hellbend to win the war and win every km2 back including Crimea by military means? That is virtually imposdible absent millions of dead.
    Because they are not germans, they're all israelites

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It shows how utterly stupid women are, and to be fair, many men too.
    Ukraine will not win if they commit to total war against Russia because their industry has been annihilated and a lot of their population has fled the country and anyway is only a fraction of Russia.
    Russia has escalation dominance over Ukraine and even much of NATO.

    Russia is now out-producing not only the pitiful Ukraine but the entirety of NATO in terms of military materiel. Ammo, guns, arty, tanks, missiles, etc.

    NATO would have to commit itself to war in Russia with respect to actual soldiers. We would also have to commit to a military economy and industry.
    But even in this fantasy analysis there are serious problems.
    A military industry would take many years to be built up/revived in the West.
    We are a faint shadow of WW2-era USA.
    We would also have to train and commit troops.
    Even if all of this was done, such a conventional war would rapidly then escalate to nuclear.

    I wish people would stop being stupid and try to think objectively and rationally about this conflict. Which never should have happened, no thanks to us, but that's a whole other can of worms.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Russia is now out-producing not only the pitiful Ukraine but the entirety of NATO in terms of military materiel.
      >according to the russian Ministry of Defense

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        According to CNN, citing NATO country officials
        https://edition.cnn.com/2024/03/10/politics/russia-artillery-shell-production-us-europe-ukraine/index.html

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Conclusion of this thread, we must exterminate german woman, that would solve a lot of problems.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Wait, first I have to bring her freedom

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous
  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Azov Batallion, an ethno-nationalist militant group that has been propped up by CIA since at least 2013, perhaps earlier, was at the core of the CIA facilitated coup of Euromaidan 2014.

    Their ethno-nationalist aspiration is admirable, but I'm curious as what they think a victory over Russia would achieve.

    Let's assume Ukraine wins the war and Azov earns their place as legendary warriors who solidified Ukrainian independence. What follows?

    This is what I suspect would follow, regardless of the wish of the Ukrainian people:

    Ukraine would have to
    >become at a minimum 50% black within a decade
    >pay denbts forever, think versaille treaty times a gorillion, for starting the war (which we obviously recklessly lead them into)
    >land is owned by blackrock or whatever other benevolent shekelholder that has your best interest at heart
    >Azov, suddenly realizing they're getting blacked, Malmö and Paris tier levels, suddenly start to revolt against muh western allies of liberation
    >Azov get's declared a terrorist organization
    >The country turns into civil war once again

    Mark my words, whether Ukraine wins or loses,
    they'll meet the same fate as
    >iraq
    >libya
    >syria
    >afghanistan
    That's the Middle Eastern chapter of "US Foreign Policy of the 21th century",

    We're now entering the European chapter,
    >Ukraine...

    Who's next?

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The current world order is based on the concept that the established political borders are final and must be respected.
    Russia thinks it's special and gets to break the rules.
    Russia is fricking around and needs to find out.

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >t.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *