Women should be designated as

>prefertiles
>fertiles
>postfertiles
>infertiles
This is political.
To do this would shift perception of women such that reproduction would be glorified.
>A side bonus is that men attracted to prefertiles and postfertiles would be roundly mocked as evolutionary dead-ends.
Because, why would you be attracted to something that can't gurantee you posterity.

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Cetus8𖦹

    How do you envision convincing normal, sane people to believe and adopt your classification?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Take hold of the govenment and information apparatus and you can convince people that men can become women, and chemical castration of children is humane and should be celebrated, people are lemmings.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ideally, it would be printed onto government issued IDs by age.

      This small step would inspire a gradual cultural shift.
      >how?
      It gives women a powerful weapon against each other.

      Women are vicious.

      Competition, shame, sabotage; these IDs would trick them into glorifying reproductivity.

      >Oh? Wwll let's see your ID then..
      >postfertile!? Lmao.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Makes sense to me

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >fat stupid or ugly
    category: infertile

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    they would like it even tho they would say they don't

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Couldn’t slide a piece of paper between her and the wall, and already getting disgusting lip-filler. Its so over

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Oops I accidentally did a heckin memeflaggarino

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Women live rent free in my house

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >wants to be a bad b***h forever
    >is already ugly
    Imagine being a woman.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why would you need classifications? You can look at a woman and know around how old they are. Any woman in their 20's is perfect. early 30's at latest.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Cultural enforcment aperatus

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They already are, its just called something else
    >Young(sub30)
    >Married with kids
    >Wine aunt cat moron
    >Fat and disguisting/lesbian/cares at all about identity politics

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    All the morons on /misc/ desiring prefertiles, makes it clear that castrating them would be fine.
    >nooo my balls!
    You only like prefertiles. Thus you couldn't even use your balls if you wanted to. SNIP.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >only

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Women are currently destroying the fabric of society and ruining centuries of civilization.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    sigh...
    ok anon, from a scale of 1 to 10
    how big is her wiener ?

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I agree, women should get married at peak fertility, or just before it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >prefertiles
      Lol. Evolutionary dead weight homosexual.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Can I get one of your girls that never age? thanks

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Wtf are you talking about?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Obviously better to marry them early guaranteeing the greatest amount of time in the fertile window, it's just common sense. Nobody wants an old used up hag.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    that's a man?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *