Would it be hypocritical of me to want a girl with a low body count (I could care less if she is a virgin or not) while I have a decently high body co...

Would it be hypocritical of me to want a girl with a low body count (I could care less if she is a virgin or not) while I have a decently high body count myself?

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Stop saying body count

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      People I slept with?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yo what's your body count? you know what the most important thing to me is? my body count. as it should be for any man. what could possibly be more important to me or you in this world than the number of women i fricked?

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No more than women are hypocrites for wanting men who are taller than them.
    Dating preferences aren't a moral question, there's no contradiction in wanting something that you're not.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Dating preferences aren't a moral question, there's no contradiction in wanting something that you're not.

      This, except race mixers. they deserve the rope and the hanging fruit that comes with it

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is a false equivalency. You're comparing appearance, which cannot be altered in most cases, to lifestyle, which can be altered in most cases.
      The equivalency of women wanting tall men would be men who wan women with huge juicy milkers
      The equivalency of men wanting low body count women would be women wanting a guy who goes to the gym.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This and also men and women are different so it’s not a double standard
      /everythreadonthistopicever

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No more hypocritical for wanting to date a female despite the fact that you are male.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah, it's 100% hypocritical.
    What's your main reason for wanting a girl with a low body count and not one similar to yours?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It isn't though, men and women are NOT equal and never were. Men should be allowed to have a harem of girls and girls should be shamed and bullied for loose behaviour. Unfortuntately in today's modern society this isn't realistic, so I do nothing and let women destroy themselves then laugh about it when I told them I told u so

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Somewhat hypocritical, but it's not as big a difference as demanding a woman be a virgin for you. You're both still promiscuous; you're just further along than she would be.

        Sex takes two. Regardless of the differences between men and women, a double standard simply doesn't work. Male promiscuity requires female promiscuity, so if the former is acceptable, the latter WILL occur as a result.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          it worked for thousands of years before feminism.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            European society stamped out polygamy with the Romans, even before Christianity came along and made it a core moral issue.
            As for the dominant moral system of the past 1700 years or so, church teaching didn't give men a free pass. The gender which has financial control, goes out in public, and is hornier tends to be more likely to indulge, but that hardly makes it a good thing for society.

            The failure to effectively control male immorality is also in large part what led to feminism. Even if turning back the clock had anything to do with your polygamous power fantasy (it doesn't), you'd end up with exactly the same problems as in the past, but this time the people have a blueprint in memory for how to avoid it. You'd only reinforce the feminist narrative by acting as the bogeyman they need.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            under the romans, yes a man had only one wife, but he could still have slaves to frick, they just didn't have the status of wife.

            the solution is to bring back slavery.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don’t have a good answer for this. Maybe jealousy?
      I slept with 15 people so I’m not to talk about i read a lot of girls are just as disgusted at a guy with a high body count as a guy is disgusted with a girl with a high body count

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        As long as you don't feel entitled to it your personal preference is honestly fine, anon. You can't change the past but you can learn from it.

        If I like someone and their body count isn't astronomical, they don't have any std's, and they've at least learned from their experiences I can't see it in myself to rule them out as a potential partner.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why would I want a an easy lock to pick when my dick is a skeleton key?

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It only would be hypocritical if you sustain a morally, ideological or rational double standard, like if you believed that pure people should only be with pure people or something like that. However if it's just a matter of preference then you wouldn't be hypocritical at all, some women will get angry for it but you wouldn't be hypocritical.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nothing to do with hypocrisy, but it's a bit of a butthole move. Not to the women, but to the men. You helped ruin lots of women in the dating pool and then you look for one of the half-decents for yourself when it's time to settle down.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No more hypocritical than a bobcat eating a rabbit but not wanting to be eaten by a cougar.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    yes it would be hypocritical
    if i'm saving myself for you i want you to have saved yourself for me

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I know of this magical thing, its called 'Lying'

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why do you care about it?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Idk why I never really cared about it unless she was like a hooker
      I started to watch some redpill stuff after a friend put me onto it and the idea started forming

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ok let me tell you, that i have a friend, who worked as a sex worker and i guarantuee you, she is the most genuine good hearted person you will ever meet in your entire life.
        You can care as much about body count as you want, it doesnt tell you jack about someones value as a friend or gf.
        For as long as you care about it, you will miss out on people who had a tough life but making it worthwile.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You are a woman

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You are a Black person

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >who worked as a sex worker and i guarantuee you, she is the most genuine good hearted person you will ever meet in your entire life

          This almost made me laugh with how bullshit it sounds. Most porn stars are lovely ppl, doesn't mean I would ever put my dick in one or date one knowing there's videos of her taking 5 different colored dicks at once. Kevin was right, we really do need to bring back fricking shame in this society

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            my point is, you can put your d into a woman who has no body counts and still be unhappy whereas there could be a woman who made or not made a choice in her life that resulted in a video with kevin, but could make you in this lifetime genuinely happy that you have her by your side.
            at some point, if you have experienced life thoroughly enough, there is not even a question of shame anymore. Surely there are some hard borders, but at some point what you regard as ultimately bad and good becomes relative. You can have your low body count woman, im not minding it one bit. Have it and be happy. But i am saying that you are naive and havent understood how things work yet.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Doesnt work that way for men, its the exact reason why a b***h can take so many dicks and a guy is disgusted. We literally are not wired to find that shit attractive enough to be serious with you past fricking or even dealing with you at all.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >there is not even a question of shame anymore
            >at some point what you regard as ultimately bad and good becomes relative.
            This is a repulsive mindset. I don't want to be with someone who thinks like this to cope with their own gross immorality.

            >Most porn stars are lovely ppl, doesn't mean I would ever put my dick in one or date one
            I agree, although you missed his point, which is that body count doesn't say anything about someone's personality or compatibility with you.

            >that body count doesn't say anything about someone's personality or compatibility
            Are you insane?
            A person's behavior in relationships (both what they did and how much/often) says a great deal about those things--it's arguably the single most important piece of evidence.
            The fact that you, and the promiscuous people you're defending, think this doesn't matter is exactly why you're incompatible with those who do care.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >it's arguably the single most important piece of evidence.
            It isn't, and you're an extremely shallow simpleton if you think so.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Okay, sherlock, what is the best evidence of a person's personality and attitudes, if it's not their own actions?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Your question is a moronic one, because you yourself don't measure according to someone's actions. You measure according to statistics, i.e. body count.

            You yourself admitted (or someone else here did) that a porn star could be a lovely person. Plenty of girls with high empathy levels become escorts or porn stars. It's because there's dozens of reasons why someone would become such a thing. If you reduce people to a number, you eliminate their humanity from the equation entirely, like an autistic twit.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            > you yourself don't measure according to someone's actions.
            Yes, I do. I can forgive you for not knowing what my specific standards are, since I didn't say and they aren't relevant to my point, but I said "both what they did and how much/often" matters. Body count (which I agree is a crude metric) is the latter, but the former is my focus.
            It's just that those who say "body count doesn't matter" tend to dismiss the things it's used as a heuristic for--you know, personality and compatibility--not just the usefulness of the heuristic.

            >You yourself admitted (or someone else here did) that a porn star could be a lovely person.
            That was someone else. I don't think that immorality, however deep, in one area means a person is irredeemably evil in everything they do (although the kinds of people who get into porn tend to be severely mentally ill and narcissistic). But I do think it makes them irredeemable for anything those flaws concern. Sure, a literal prostitute might love animals and show them nothing but kindness, but that doesn't mean she has any business being in a relationship with someone who treats intimacy more seriously than a way to buy luxury handbags.

            >It's because there's dozens of reasons why someone would become such a thing.
            At the end of the day, only one thing matters: whether they hold to moral standards or not. The only excuse for an ex-prostitute is being a victim of human trafficking, because that's involuntary. Anything else shows that she thought it was acceptable to become a prostitute, which says all I need to know about her values.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >those who say "body count doesn't matter" tend to dismiss the things it's used as a heuristic for--you know, personality and compatibility
            A very clever way to mask your true intentions, which is to shun those who make you feel insecure (i.e., women with higher body counts than you). I know this is what you really intend to do since you hide behind statistics like every other Abrahamic narcissist on the internet.

            You have nothing interesting to say, I've seen your kind for decades, and no, you don't judge according to actions. If you did, you would actually look at a person's actions rather than reduce everything to an abstraction. Two escorts or porn stars could be taking entirely different actions — one could be in that profession because they resent their family or hate themselves, and therefore are deliberately partaking in work that feels demeaning to them as a form of rebellion or self-injury, while the other could be in that profession because they found that a huge number of men feel unexplainably safe to be vulnerable with them and it was something they were naturally good at. But if you just look at the title of the profession, or the body count number, which are both abstractions, then you'd be overlooking these details — the stories of their lives which make them human beings.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            How many times do I have to tell you that I think those actions are reprehensible in themselves? I’m not hiding behind anything. I’m saying that it’s false to pretend like people’s actions don’t reflect their character.
            > Two escorts or porn stars could be taking entirely different actions
            I think being a prostitute is disgusting in itself. That they chose to do it is wage facet of the character I condemn them for. I don’t care about their motives.
            I already said I don’t consider them bad in every conceivable facet of their personality. But that’s irrelevant to the fact that it’s a dealbreaker on its own. This isn’t ‘dehumanizing’ any more than you can’t help but show your utter contempt for people who aren’t so unquestionably accepting of promiscuity as you are. You don’t need to know how you get along with my family, you don’t need to know whether I pay my debts—all you need to know is that I don’t like bawds and under no circumstances would ever date one. That single fact is, in itself, enough to make you dislike me or decide that I’m not being earnest with you.
            And ironically, you started seething about religion when I’m not even religious, nor was so raised to be. So where I judge exactly the behavior people engage in, you can’t help but jump to false conclusions.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            you sound like you believe in santa claus..
            if you are a really good boy, good things habbening to you..get real.

            >It absolutely fricking does and if you disagree you're either a virgin or a woman.
            I'm neither, you clueless imbecile.

            >I have not met ANY healthy male that was ok with his gf having a notch count WAAY higher than his.
            And?

            >40 or 50 dicks
            What a moronic amount you pulled out of your ass. If you want to make a point, make the argument realistic — oh wait, you won't do that, because you know you don't actually have anything to say about this:

            >body count doesn't say anything about someone's personality or compatibility with you.

            Your question is a moronic one, because you yourself don't measure according to someone's actions. You measure according to statistics, i.e. body count.

            You yourself admitted (or someone else here did) that a porn star could be a lovely person. Plenty of girls with high empathy levels become escorts or porn stars. It's because there's dozens of reasons why someone would become such a thing. If you reduce people to a number, you eliminate their humanity from the equation entirely, like an autistic twit.

            well said.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >if you are a really good boy, good things habbening to you
            How did you get this from my post?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >what is the best evidence of a person's personality and attitudes, if it's not their own actions?
            life is not linear.
            persons personality and attitudes ->evidence of that is their actions.
            there are tons of factors, again, that you do not weight in when judging their actions. its not like: good girl -->good actions.
            thats why i said you sound naive and a santa kid.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Are you esl? I don’t follow.
            Someone who willingly commits actions I find dealbreakingly immoral already shows me they aren’t opposed to those things, or at minimum can’t be trusted to uphold their professed morals.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Most porn stars are lovely ppl, doesn't mean I would ever put my dick in one or date one
            I agree, although you missed his point, which is that body count doesn't say anything about someone's personality or compatibility with you.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Mate you what? It absolutely fricking does and if you disagree you're either a virgin or a woman. I have not met ANY healthy male that was ok with his gf having a notch count WAAY higher than his. Now if they were both being a man prostitute and bawd together then yes, but take your average man and he will be absolutely not ok with finding out his gf or wife took 40 or 50 dicks at one point in her life or had a bawd phase where she was just letting shit happen.

            https://www.tiktok.com/@iamfrankswisher/video/7215916128785288494 is pitched as a joke, but this is exactly how men feel when they find out.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >It absolutely fricking does and if you disagree you're either a virgin or a woman.
            I'm neither, you clueless imbecile.

            >I have not met ANY healthy male that was ok with his gf having a notch count WAAY higher than his.
            And?

            >40 or 50 dicks
            What a moronic amount you pulled out of your ass. If you want to make a point, make the argument realistic — oh wait, you won't do that, because you know you don't actually have anything to say about this:

            >body count doesn't say anything about someone's personality or compatibility with you.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You should reflect on why you care about it then, because it doesn't seem like there's a reason to.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think if you were shaming women for having a high body count, yeah, that’d be hypocritical. But you’re not doing that, you just have a personal preference for women with a lower body count, so no, it’s not hypocritical.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you just go ahead and look up the definition of hypocritical in a dictionary you'll be able to answer your own question. I suspect what you're really asking about is whether it is wrong to do that. Hypocrisy is not always wrong. For example parents tell their children to not do things that the parents as adults can do such as drink and have sex. It's hypocritical but it's also universally considered the right thing to do.

    We need to consider the context. When you see a woman with a low number of men on the roster, whatever low means to you, what is your motivation behind that? If your motivation is solely your own ego and insecurity, then that's a you problem and it would be wrong. But if, as it usually is, about the reality that a promiscuous woman is more likely to have children with another man, try to trick you into raising another mans kids, have disease or have difficulty remaining faithful then those are valid concerns and right even if hypocritical. Men can't have babies, I know that's for some reason controversial to say these days but we men can not get pregnant. Only women.

    Now depending on what you mean by a high number of women on your roster, the woman may have her own valid concerns. You might for example say

    >> I only want a woman who has been with one or two other men at most, while I've been with 5 or 6

    And although hypocritical would be perfectly fine. However if for example you wanted the woman from above but you had been with women in the double digits or like me triple digits, then you should expect that woman would have valid concerns and not want you. Understand?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Men can't have babies, I know that's for some reason controversial to say these days but we men can not get pregnant. Only women.

      For me this is my whole point of bawds, every man you fricked is a man you gambled with getting you pregnant and lets be real, most of them didnt deserve to frick so now I'm with a woman with a Russian Roulette vegana and I might be the unlucky gay who gets the losing number, meanwhile she gets a lotto ticket for what? Just being a woman. That's why I feel bad seeing girls I went to high school, who're now fat and lazy, with their current bf or husbands. I saw and heard stories of this chick taking mad dick in her prime high school years but you think you bagged a winner that is the equitant of spoiled milk, when there are guys who had her when she was tighter and more fit? Pop off king

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yes, the reproductive strategy of bawds is to frick as many men as possible to increase the chances of pregnancy at the expense of relationship.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >the reproductive strategy of bawds
          Pretty sure they're just horny and having fun

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, of course.

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No because women don't care about male body-count. If anything, the higher your BC the better since it means you're attractive and you have good genes.
    It's just biology, female virginity matters, male "virginity" doesn't.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >female virginity matters
      Why?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        pair bonding. virgin females are still capable of pair bonding and are less likely to try to monkey branch.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          This sounds very unscientific, not to mention I personally know women who disprove this. Do you have studies on this to share?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >muh studies
            "studies" in the social "sciences" are bullshit. "ethical" requirements prevent any truly worthwhile studies from ever happening.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            And random, unorganized hearsay is better? At least with studies you can see how the study was conducted and who was selected for it.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Women tend to care relatively less compared to men. That doesn’t mean they don’t care at all, let alone think a guy whoring around is a positive.
      A guy who is attractive to women can be promiscuous…because he was already attractive. But he’s only squandering his positives on promiscuity. The best thing he could do, to any sane and moral woman (not a bawd), would be to deliberately choose not to frick around, despite clearly having the opportunity. A guy who is not only conventionally attractive by both appearance an personality but who also shows self-discipline and commitment isn’t going to turn off any woman who wants and is prepared for a lasting relationship.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        100% this

        I don't know where this modern notion that men are meant to sleep with as many women as possible and never "settle down" came from. It doesn't benefit women or children at all for men to be this way. In fact, I'm sure you can find evidence for the idea that households in which the men left on account of their promiscuity resulted in weaker / more neurotic children.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is a woman a hypocrite if she wants her first time to be with an experienced man so her partner knows what to do instead of being a fumbling virgin like herself?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No it's just women's nature to be more attracted to experienced men

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's not so important if a woman is a prostitute or a madonna so much as whether she's made of sugar and spice or cigarettes and dime store vodka.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *