In this ongoing trend on questioning women which they'd rather encounter, I find that males miss the point entirely.

In this ongoing trend on questioning women which they'd rather encounter, I find that males miss the point entirely.

The common male seething response to how most women are answering is

>but bears will mess you up they're so much deadlier/stronger than a man!

Which is misunderstanding the situation. Yes, the bear is more deadly, *if it chooses to attack.* That is the point here - bears are highly unlikely to attack you unless provoked, whereas men are more unpredictable and far more likely to hurt you, and unlike the bear, have a chance of hurting/killing you for no reason at all. Being alone with a man is unironically the less safe option.

I have personally experienced this - when I most recently encountered a bear, I just placed some uncooked hot dogs for him and he enjoyed them and was on his way, no aggression whatsoever despite close proximity.

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bait thread don't reply

    fr

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Bait thread don't reply
      Maybe so, sounds realistic to me. This is the inner workings of the average c**toid.

    • 3 weeks ago
      sage

      Literally the first post and people STILL reply to this moronic troony pedophile. Do people just not read threads before they post in them?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No, we all saw that reply. We don't care. Calling something bait just to avoid a legitimate discussion is lame.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >bears are highly unlikely to attack you unless provoked
    Polar bears are one of the only animals that actively predates on humans.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      even then most polar bears encounters do not go that way. I actually watched a documentary on them once, the guy talked about how the mistake is that people panic when, in his words, most of the time polar bears come up to people they're just curious and will sniff you then leave. most attacks, which are exceedingly rare even just compared to encounters, are only because people panic and try to hit or throw stuff at the bear.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        In the arctic anything that moves is food, you like all dumb roasties keep projecting human level reasoning on wild animals

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >I actually watched a documentary on them once,
        You don't live in bear country. You know nothing.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >You don't live in bear country.
          I live in black bear country. they are my friends. they just want you to throw them some deli meats or bread

          [...]
          >because they attack women for no reason not infrequently
          Again, do you have anything concrete to base this on?

          >Again, do you have anything concrete to base this on?
          femicides statistics

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >femicides statistics
            Okay. Show me those. And the stats for bear attacks.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Crime statistics
            Reliable stats on the chances of the matters talked about in this thread would be enough. Show them to me.

            >spoonfeed my incel NEET ass
            Just go outside and see for yourself

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Just go outside and see for yourself
            See what for myself? Whatever sliver of the world I interact with is insufficient to base a robust generalization model on.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ok we get it mowgli, now hot dog your way out of the fricking board. kys

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You know what I think I'll trust Herman Melville on polar bears over what some limp dick scientist has to say.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Women in the west should be beat more

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Lmao literally no roastie is picking man, what a fricking subhuman sex

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Men are not far more likely to attack you. Yes, the number of bear attacks is lower, but the number of bear encounters women experience is a fraction of a fraction of the number of male encounters. The fact that so many of you fail to understand this is a testament to your mental deficiency and detachment from reality.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This. Bear attack statistics are based on the astronomical chances of even meeting a bear on your own in the first place. There are no known statistics for how often bears will attack given that the encounter has already taken place.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I know two people personally who have had to shoot and kill brown bears, they WILL try to fight you

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just curious, what do you think is the percentage of encounters with bears that end either in death or injury, vs what do you thing is the percentage of encounters with men that end in death or injury?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Just curious, what do you think is the percentage of encounters with bears that end either in death or injury, vs what do you thing is the percentage of encounters with men that end in death or injury?
      considering how often the black bear is encountered, undoubtedly the percentage for males is higher
      black bears are so docile I'd call them friendly. in my region you see them all the time. they're about as dangerous as a stray cat, and the fact that they're becoming so used to people/people-friendly means they're unlikely to be spooked by you either, which is the main reason for bear attacks.

      Men are not far more likely to attack you. Yes, the number of bear attacks is lower, but the number of bear encounters women experience is a fraction of a fraction of the number of male encounters. The fact that so many of you fail to understand this is a testament to your mental deficiency and detachment from reality.

      >but the number of bear encounters women experience is a fraction of a fraction of the number of male encounters
      yes, I'm saying even if you adjusted for this it would be true. the lone male encounter-violence ratio is higher than the bear encounter-violence ratio if adjusted to the same denominator.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >onsidering how often the black bear is encountered, undoubtedly the percentage for males is higher
        Okay. Do you have any numbers to back this undeniable statement up?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Do you have any numbers to back this undeniable statement up?
          no because obviously the vast majority of bear encounters aren't going to be reported if they're non-violent. again where I'm from black bears are seen all the time.

          No, you still don't get it, you absolute fricking moron.

          There is absolutely no doubt that if there were 160 million grizzly bears in the United States and you encountered them everywhere you currently encounter men, eventually you would suffer vastly more attacks from grizzly bears than you suffer from men.

          The apparent statistical lack of "grizzly bear risk" is ENTIRELY A FUNCTION of the rarity of your encounters with them.

          >WAAAAAHHHHHHHH nooooooo bears only attack when provoked!

          You have no way to control what bears will, and will not, perceive as a provocation. Simply walking in the direction of a bear with cubs is often seen as a provocation.

          It is precisely the fact that you utterly lack the ability to properly assess your own risk that fills us with fricking contempt for you.

          1) again the question as it's being asked in most spaces is about encountering a single man alone without other people around
          2) you specifically went for grizzlies when other bears exist, which would be like asking women specifically about black or Hispanic men.

          You are such a fricking moron
          The chances if a man attacking you is extremely low. Men don't attack unprovoked either and you are most likely to get harmed by a man that you are in a relationship with so just don't frick the man in the woods.
          You are such a low iq moron pretending to be smart.

          >Men don't attack unprovoked either
          no? a ton of femicides are "just because" as a motive. they simply see a woman alone, realize the opportunity, and take it. this is why femicides, especially serial ones, are often difficult to find culprits and go unsolved, because they lack any motive other than desire to kill women.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >no because obviously the vast majority of bear encounters aren't going to be reported if they're non-violent.
            There should be reliable estimates with generous confidence intervals.
            >again where I'm from black bears are seen all the time.
            Where I'm from men are seen all the time.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            again the question is about lone male encounters without other people around. moron

            >a ton of femicides are "just because" as a motive
            How many of these "tons" have happened over the last 5 or so decades? I recon about a dozen at most and tje vast majority being in shitholed like india.

            Look at the race of the culprits of these incidents and where they were located.

            >How many of these "tons" have happened over the last 5 or so decades?
            well last year alone in the UK alone there were 95, they hold a conference each year on international women's day for it. so, extrapolating from that, worldwide for 50 years it's probably quite a lot more than a dozen.
            >Look at the race of the culprits of these incidents and where they were located.
            so in my cited case, a first world country and primarily white? so in other words for India and Africa and such it would be even more?
            also remember when that UK representative said we shouldn't count femicides as a hate crime because "b-but then they would compose the vast majority of hate crimes!" and skew the numbers away from race lol

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >again the question is about lone male encounters without other people around. moron
            The overwhelming majority of murders are committed by people who know and are close to the victims. At least in western nations. The likelihood of a random guy who you meet on a walk in the forest murdering you is significantly lower that the likelihood of you being murdered by a man at all, which is tiny to begin with.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            95 in a country of ~67 million people with extremely high population density. Wooow.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >so in my cited case, a first world country and primarily white?
            The uk is only "primarily white" in some locations moron. London is not primarily white, many areas in south and even northern england are nor primarily white. Please cite the location of all these events so we can attribute them to the correct races :^)

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >well last year alone in the UK alone there were 95
            London is literally majority non white and there are tons of islamists living there.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >a ton of femicides are "just because" as a motive
            How many of these "tons" have happened over the last 5 or so decades? I recon about a dozen at most and tje vast majority being in shitholed like india.

            Look at the race of the culprits of these incidents and where they were located.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >no because obviously the vast majority of bear encounters aren't going to be reported if they're non-violent. again where I'm from black bears are seen all the time.

            If merely being in the vicinity of a black bear - like driving by one on the shoulder of the New York Thruway, for example - counts as an "encounter", do you know how many MEN every woman "encounters" in the course of a year?

            You apparently have absolutely no idea the impact the DENOMINATOR has on a risk assessment. That's what has enraged the people who have to listen to you spew fricking nonsense.

            If you went to school, you sat in a building with hundreds of males for 6 or 7 hours a day for YEARS. Do you know what would happen to you if I locked you in a warehouse with 400 black bears for 6 hours a day for 12 years? You would not survive that, no matter how "docile" you falsely believe black bears to be.

            >again the question as it's being asked in most spaces is about encountering a single man alone without other people around

            NO, that was the initial scenario, but the discussion of that scenario led fricking morons (like you) to make the blanket assertion:

            >whereas men are more unpredictable and far more likely to hurt you

            That's what you wrote in your fricking post, you intellectually dishonest sack of fricking dog shit.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >If merely being in the vicinity of a black bear - like driving by one on the shoulder of the New York Thruway, for example
            that wouldn't count here. talking lone bear encounters vs lone male encounters. I'd say if you're in a car it doesn't count
            >led fricking morons (like you) to make the blanket assertion:
            yes, again, lone males, obviously they're not going to attack with other people around to hold them accountable.
            >That's what you wrote in your fricking post
            I didn't think you were so moronic you needed that part spelled out.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What makes you think a man will atack you for no reason?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Her subhuman foid brain wired to see only stone acting brutes as men

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Men kill random women all the time. You are literally at the mercy of random males every time you leave the house and you shouldn't trust a single one of them because they're just waiting for an opportunity to attack you.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >random
            >posts a woman that deserved it

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >women getting beheaded by thugs
            >deserved it

            Her crime was walking on the streets and looking a man in the eye for a split second which triggered the man's killer instinct. This is the aftermath, this is what you get for looking at a man directly, gang rape and murder.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Based. Why was she not with her father or husband, and why was she dressed like a prostitute? She earned her punishment

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >What makes you think a man will atack you for no reason?
            because they attack women for no reason not infrequently, and I am a woman.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >not infrequently
            That's an understatement. You're more likely to get killed by a random man than dying in a car accident.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You have no idea how unsettling it is to me to watch that guy taking the stabs motionless, and that many stabs as well, I don't know why. The fricking security doing nothing...

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            this was a lesbian couple in China, the man attacked them for no reason. This could happen to you any time when you're around men.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >not infrequently
            That's an understatement. You're more likely to get killed by a random man than dying in a car accident.

            >because they attack women for no reason not infrequently
            Again, do you have anything concrete to base this on?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >anything concrete
            Crime statistics and real life isn't enough?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Crime statistics
            Reliable stats on the chances of the matters talked about in this thread would be enough. Show them to me.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What makes you think most of these attacks are completely unprovoked? Men aren't just deranged wild animals. They don't just throw away their whole future without good reason

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Men aren't just deranged wild animals.
            These webms have clearly shown that they are. Women aren't safe anywhere.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            he just said without good reason kek

            >"but but everyone has the right to live"

            nah

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >this handful of webms with zero context has PROVEN that ALL MEN are psycho murder rapists!
            Oh, to see the inside of a foid's mind for just one day.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They are not likely to do that. It's like 1 in 10000 and most of it happens in 3rd world countries where the average iq is 80. I bet you live in the west.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >yes, I'm saying even if you adjusted for this it would be true. the lone male encounter-violence ratio is higher than the bear encounter-violence ratio if adjusted to the same denominator.
        And I'm saying you're a lying moron, like most women.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        There is no reason to bear attacks, animals dont need a reason to maul you. See black people to understand better.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the lone male encounter-violence ratio is higher than the bear encounter-violence ratio if adjusted to the same denominator
        Do you have data for that or are you strictly talking out your ass?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          again:
          >no because obviously the vast majority of bear encounters aren't going to be reported as they're non-violent. again where I'm from black bears are seen all the time.
          a while back I literally had to stop for a bear and her cubs crossing the road. she cast me a brief glance and nothing more.

          > Yes, the bear is more deadly, *if it chooses to attack.* That is the point here - bears are highly unlikely to attack you unless provoked, whereas men are more unpredictable and far more likely to hurt you
          A random average bear, encountered in the wild, is more likely to attack you than a random average man, encountered in the wild.
          >and unlike the bear, have a chance of hurting/killing you for no reason at all
          The bear also has a chance of randomly being provoked attacking you.

          tl;dr: Women (including OP) believe that a man is more likely to attack them since there are more attack by men than attacks by bears. This is because women (including OP) are unable to differentiate between the two very different concepts of per capita and on average, This is a sign of low IQ commonly found in oversocialised normies.

          again, I'm talking about when adjusted for per capita. males always screech "but muh per capita!" projecting their IQ onto me. I *AM* talking about adjusting the ratio of encounters.

          what about the bear or your heckin teenage virgin boy who would rail the frick out of you

          obviously then I would prefer the teenage boy. we're not talking about consensual encounters

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Okay so you are strictly talking out your ass.
            I think you might be too low iq to understand and discuss these things, anon. You are purely arguing with feelings and have no argument in terms of actual reason.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I have personally experienced this - when I most recently encountered a bear, I just placed some uncooked hot dogs for him and he enjoyed them and was on his way, no aggression whatsoever despite close proximity.
    If you did the same with a random man and he didn't attack you, would you have come here to say that men are not aggressive?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      why would I give a man uncooked hot dogs

      Go to a zoo with a bear enclosure and evaluate whether you should climb in to get away from the men around you.

      >to get away from the men around you.
      the question going around specifically pertains to lone male encounters where you are left alone with the man/no one else around

      In the arctic anything that moves is food, you like all dumb roasties keep projecting human level reasoning on wild animals

      I said nothing about reasoning. they're not reasoning, they're just objectively unlikely to attack and mostly just inspecting you out of curiosity, which is common animal behavior.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Lone male encounters? Your surrounded by white knights frick off stupid roastie

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        As a man, I would prefer that you gave me raw liver instead of hot dogs. I would absolutely be your friend if you did

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Go to a zoo with a bear enclosure and evaluate whether you should climb in to get away from the men around you.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You are laughably moronic and I sincerely hope a bear rapes and simultaneously eats you. You deserve this fate. Leave this website, woman

    [...]

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No, you still don't get it, you absolute fricking moron.

    There is absolutely no doubt that if there were 160 million grizzly bears in the United States and you encountered them everywhere you currently encounter men, eventually you would suffer vastly more attacks from grizzly bears than you suffer from men.

    The apparent statistical lack of "grizzly bear risk" is ENTIRELY A FUNCTION of the rarity of your encounters with them.

    >WAAAAAHHHHHHHH nooooooo bears only attack when provoked!

    You have no way to control what bears will, and will not, perceive as a provocation. Simply walking in the direction of a bear with cubs is often seen as a provocation.

    It is precisely the fact that you utterly lack the ability to properly assess your own risk that fills us with fricking contempt for you.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I prefer a carnivore that killed native americans over a human male
    Roasties my god

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You are such a fricking moron
    The chances if a man attacking you is extremely low. Men don't attack unprovoked either and you are most likely to get harmed by a man that you are in a relationship with so just don't frick the man in the woods.
    You are such a low iq moron pretending to be smart.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    women walk by thousands of men each day safely
    how many bears have you walked by? im curious

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >women walk by thousands of men each day safely
      The number is probably closer to billions

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I meant more for a single woman in a day. Like any woman in a big city has walked by near a thousand guys if she is there all day

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I meant more for a single woman in a day. Like any woman in a big city has walked by near a thousand guys if she is there all day

      >women walk by thousands of men each day safely
      The number is probably closer to billions

      again, you absolute moron, as I've said several times now:
      >the question going around specifically pertains to lone male encounters where you are left alone with the man/no one else around

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why do you, as an ugly 30 year old woman, think I would give you the time of day, much less bother killing or raping you?

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    > Yes, the bear is more deadly, *if it chooses to attack.* That is the point here - bears are highly unlikely to attack you unless provoked, whereas men are more unpredictable and far more likely to hurt you
    A random average bear, encountered in the wild, is more likely to attack you than a random average man, encountered in the wild.
    >and unlike the bear, have a chance of hurting/killing you for no reason at all
    The bear also has a chance of randomly being provoked attacking you.

    tl;dr: Women (including OP) believe that a man is more likely to attack them since there are more attack by men than attacks by bears. This is because women (including OP) are unable to differentiate between the two very different concepts of per capita and on average, This is a sign of low IQ commonly found in oversocialised normies.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I will not elaborate on the stupidity of choosing a bear in regards to how likely you will be attacked since people above my post already did that.
    Even if the man you were in the woods with attacked you so he could rape or beat you up for some reason a woman is still better off with said man because the chances she dies being by herself is higher (not even counting the bear here) than her being with a man.
    Maybe what woman want to say with choosing the bear is that in case of attack they would rather be killed and man sometimes leave them alive while the bear and nature itself would just kill her off.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    what about the bear or your heckin teenage virgin boy who would rail the frick out of you

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if you have nothing more important that to discuss this hypothetical, you are an npc. this also goes for all the guys crying about it

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if we play under the assumption that whatever you will attack you in the encounter, you are an idiot if you do not choose man.
    If we are assuming there would be no attack then bear is understandable but boring
    If there could be but doesn't have to be an attack, then man is once again the safest choice.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >if we play under the assumption that whatever you will attack you in the encounter
      uh no? that's the point

      Lol put a wienerroach near them

      a wienerroach is different as it's inherently disgusting.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        no it isnt
        women only dislike wienerroaches because they are socialized to
        there is nothing inherently disgusting about them

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And bears are bigger and stronger than wienerroaches and actually kill you unlike one

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          She would probably prefer to encounter a bear instead of a wienerroach, because it would her feel safer. Statistics be damned.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >She would probably prefer to encounter a bear instead of a wienerroach, because it would her feel safer. Statistics be damned
            1) wienerroaches carry diseases
            2) yes because bears are my friends. they're silly little guys who want my hot dogs

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Ah an animal fricking white female

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >wienerroaches carry diseases
            and bears don't? Lol
            >yes because bears are my friends. they're silly little guys who want my hot dogs
            So you admit that it's irrational and based on feelings then. You don't care about the actual implicit danger. You just care about how it makes you feel and bears look cute despite being objectively more dangerous than wienerroaches

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            How the frick are bears cute?

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Women actually have no survival instincts or sense of self preservation.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Lol put a wienerroach near them

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They are evolutionary bystanders, they have evolved to do one thing, which is giving birth.

      Anyway, I'm glad this shit is picking up, I want the relationship between men and women absolutely demolished and this meme will contribute to it. I'm looking forward to the future of women being chased by deranged Black folk and no one lifting a finger to help them.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Glad I'm not the only one with this mindset. They are genuinely so cruel that they were able to break male's innate desire to simp/protect
        Its astonishing how they continue to double down but I love it
        Random stabbings here in Vancouver are picking up but unfortunately its still male on male because a male is the only one engaging the drug addict to make sure he doesn't harm anyone (and end up dying)

        OP however only sees the one deranged mugger and not the fact that its still a male standing up for others pro bono and risking his life
        Women would never but they'll b***h either way
        Womens rights were a mistake

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i choose the man so i can rape him obviously

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I love these kinds of "men bad" memes because they always leave the women spreading them looking either sociopathic or mentally challenged (the latter in this case).
    And even if it were true, men are not a monolith, it isn't fair to push accountability for what other men do onto us. All you're doing is attempting to deepen divisions between the sexes.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >All you're doing is attempting to deepen divisions between the sexes.
      That's a good thing. Women should live in a world where they have to provide and fend for themselves.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why do you care about this instead off talking with a guy on hinge like you wanted in your last post?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Why do you care about this instead off talking with a guy on hinge like you wanted in your last post?
      I don't have enough pictures to make a hinge profile, and realized I would be wasting my time as men are not good people.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this is just sad tbh, if you can't take 6 pics if yourself bc you just sit at home arguing with people on the internet

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >men are not good people
        Most are but you are usually not attracted to them.

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is OP a fricking genius or something?
    She is always able to trigger robots easily and her threads are the fastest threads on /NSFFW/, the frick? How do I acquire this power?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Baselessly insult men by writing something that looks like an argument but isn't and use a few big words that you don't understand to try to appear smart.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Is OP a fricking genius or something?
      yes.
      my intellectual superiority causes the manbeast to cry out in pain as it attempts to strike. it's seething at the recognition of its own inferiority, combined with its dog-like impulse control, means it has no choice but to express its rage.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You have to be provocative, verbose, and smug. Basically a pseud. Generalize and make wild claims without any evidence. Keep arguing in bad faith to trigger people. Common topics include gender, race, religion, and politics as those are the most likely to make people emotional.

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    so the entire point is... bears are unlikely to attack?

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    youre life would be easier if you didnt hate men

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Of course this stupid prostitute has to grace us with her take on the stupid prostitute bear meme

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No, males understand the situation correctly, women are just being moronic as usual
    A bear is going to attack you almost all of the time in relative close proximity, which the scenario implies. If it is not close proximity you are not "stuck" or "trapped" with anything by definition.
    1. a bear is more likely to attack you on average than a human, by a significant margin
    2. a bear is vastly better at tracking you than a human
    3. a bear cannot be overpowered, you will not win a fight against one basically ever, you cannot suffer an injury from a bear and go on to win, one attack is enough to do you in, you will be able to win a fight against humans some of the time and individually their attacks cause substantially less damage than a bears allowing you to last longer against them and not die from your wounds even if you win
    Anyone choosing a bear in the scenario as described without additional context like "the bear is friendly" or something, is just completely stupid, and had society not coddled you and kept you secure darwinism would have been the fate of all such people long ago
    It's no wonder our societies are a shitshow when we're forced to put up with people who merely a century or two ago would have wiped themselves out entirely with their clown iq, and we let these people vote and consider their opinion equivalent to someone who wouldn't have tried to have a tea party with a bear.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >women are just being moronic as usual
      Well, let's not generalize too much. Let's leave it at OP and certain vocal groups on X, reddit, and tik tok.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >a bear cannot be overpowered, you will not win a fight against one basically ever, you cannot suffer an injury from a bear and go on to win,
      except people do. one thwonk on the nose will send a black bear running unironically. they're the pansies of bears

      >so in my cited case, a first world country and primarily white?
      The uk is only "primarily white" in some locations moron. London is not primarily white, many areas in south and even northern england are nor primarily white. Please cite the location of all these events so we can attribute them to the correct races :^)

      >The uk is only "primarily white" in some locations moron.
      I'm talking about the femicide victims

      >men are not good people
      Most are but you are usually not attracted to them.

      no most men are not good people, statistics/research on empathy and how stats show most men say they'd rape if they could get away with it supports this, look it up

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Okay. It's been fun, but I'm not really interested in having a conversation where all the assertions are not based on anything concrete. Take care.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >statistics/research on empathy and how stats show most men say they'd rape if they could get away with it supports this, look it up
        This is one "study", done with a sample size of 86, from one university lmfao.
        It is not remotely valid or scientific at all, it's a typical "we want to be able to say x so lets conduct a 100% fake study which meets no minimum criteria for any scientific method that gives the result we want"
        The black bear will not "run", you are trapped and stuck in this scenario by the fricking wording, it has nowhere to run in the first place, it will fight no matter what because of this

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >you are trapped and stuck in this scenario by the fricking wording
          no. you made that up. that was never part of the scenario

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Those words have definitions and meanings dumbass, go ahead and post the question that was posed verbatim and we'll see if it included them and how they affect the scenario posed :^)

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            again the scenario is a lone encounter with a man, versus a lone encounter with a bear. nothing about that implies being trapped, it just means that the man/bear is solitary and that no one else is around.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            post the sentence that was posed to these women verbatim or you admit defeat anon, there's no further discussion here if you can't do that :^)

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            the actual original question was
            >if you were alone in the woods would you rather encounter a bear or a man you don't know?
            so no implications of being trapped in a confined space

            >wienerroaches carry diseases
            and bears don't? Lol
            >yes because bears are my friends. they're silly little guys who want my hot dogs
            So you admit that it's irrational and based on feelings then. You don't care about the actual implicit danger. You just care about how it makes you feel and bears look cute despite being objectively more dangerous than wienerroaches

            >You just care about how it makes you feel and bears look cute despite being objectively more dangerous than wienerroaches
            to you. bears are not more dangerous to me because they are my friends

            >when I most recently encountered a bear, I just placed some uncooked hot dogs for him and he enjoyed them and was on his way
            a fed bear is a dead bear
            now it's going to associate human beings with food and will approach them more often, increasing the chances of an attack
            you may have just indirectly killed/maimed several people just to save your own ass
            good fricking job

            the only reason bears are less likely to attack you is the fear of the unknown, a bear that knows human beings is far more likely to attack than a regular dude
            good bait though, managed to hook me this time

            no, the less afraid they are the less likely they'll panic and attack. being fed raises their friendship meter

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >being fed raises their friendship meter
            man, it was funny the first time, but now you're just making it too obvious, lol
            why don't you test out that theory again? livestream it so we see it

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Reminder the OP is s female teacher aka a boy fricking pedophile, disregard any negative thing she says about men because say a 8 year old tied her up and raped her, she would fight you if you tried to punish him.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >most men are not good people
        Since when do you b***hes like good men?

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    was the bear cute, bears look cute but also scare me

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    literally women are built for big bear wiener
    Women dont want to have to awkwardly sit near an ugly man in a forest
    they want to be MAULED by bbc

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Do fembots want to be MAULED and SWALLOWED?

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You are 0.009% likely to meet a murderer in the us. And most of those murderers had a reason so we can even lower that percentage but im going to be generous and leave it at 0.009%. and IF SOMEHOW you meet one you can outrun hit with a stick throw stones or dirt at hes eyes. If a bear wants to kill you its game over.

  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine getting SWALLOWED alive big a big masculine hairy and horny smelly bear after he pumps you full of his bear seed

  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I would rather be with a bear than a woman. The bear wouldn't accuse me of rape and ruin my whole life making me suffer as long as i live. It would just kill me.

  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    OP, would you rather bury your face in a mans ass or a bears?

  35. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >when I most recently encountered a bear, I just placed some uncooked hot dogs for him and he enjoyed them and was on his way
    a fed bear is a dead bear
    now it's going to associate human beings with food and will approach them more often, increasing the chances of an attack
    you may have just indirectly killed/maimed several people just to save your own ass
    good fricking job

    the only reason bears are less likely to attack you is the fear of the unknown, a bear that knows human beings is far more likely to attack than a regular dude
    good bait though, managed to hook me this time

  36. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I actually agree with women that the bear is less threatening. That's just facts. I hike innawoods all the time and I can tell you that a random man is 100% scarier than a random animal. Like, I'm a dude and "Is this a psycho who wants to rape me" crosses my mind.
    Plus I can legally just put 30 rounds of soft-tipped 7. 62x39mm into a bear on-sight, can't do that with a man

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      your fear is not proportional to the threat dumbass. just because you're more scared of the human cause its less predictable does not necessarily make it more of a danger than a bear, good god
      nor in the given scenario do you have a fricking gun, otherwise neither would be a threat

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The very LEAST I go into the woods with is a bow and arrow and a hunting dagger. Why would I ever go outside of civilization without weapons?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Why would I ever go outside of civilization without weapons?
          because that's the scenario posed for the hypothetical you fricking moron, you don't get to alter it

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Plus I can legally just put 30 rounds of soft-tipped 7. 62x39mm into a bear on-sight, can't do that with a man
      I mean technically if it's out in the woods there's no one to prove he wasn't attacking you and you can claim self defense

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Exactly, which is why the man is more dangerous.
        The bear is just a dumb animal. It can eat more damage, it's built like a tank, one swipe will crush ribs, it's fast as FUARK, I get it. But the bear is not actively calculating a legal defense in advance of entrapping and shooting me from a fricking treestand. The bear does not have trail cameras. The bear cannot leave razor wire at neck height or shit on a punji spike because mentally he's back in 'nam. The bear cannot swap between projectiles and melee. The bear does not have chloroform on a rag. The bear is not a redneck lunatic who threw 60-70 ball bearings and screws into an airsoft grenade rigged with homemade explosives and held together with duct tape, and the bear is not itching to test it out. The bear does not have a shipping container converted into a soundproof rape shed. The bear does not want to hunt down and silence me because I stumbled across his cartel weed grow op. The bear is not mentally ill and trying to play real-life PUBG with me in his homemade ghilly suit. The bear can't fricking lie to me.

  37. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >That is the point here - bears are highly unlikely to attack you unless provoked, whereas men are more unpredictable and far more likely to hurt you, and unlike the bear, have a chance of hurting/killing you for no reason at all.
    See, but that's not true at all. A bear will attack and kill you for any reason they see fit. This whole delusion that bears are super tame, passive creatures has been perpetuated by edutainment youtubers who profit off the "um actually" crowd. Every time you are close to a wild bear, your life is in danger. Whether you're in its territory, or it sees you as a threat, or it has babies nearby. There is no reasoning with a bear or negotiating with a bear. Bears will fricking kill you. On the other side, men don't just kill random women unprovoked. Men are generally reasonable. Furthermore, if a man does attack you, you've got significantly better odds of escaping the encounter alive than if a bear attacks you. Bears are 800lbs of pure muscle. You can't fight a bear. You can't choke a bear to death. You can't hurt a bear badly enough to convince it to run away.
    Women only choose the bear because their perception of men is warped beyond belief. The average man isn't going to attack you. The average bear might.

  38. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Women
    >are stupid as frick
    >are paranoid to a delusional degree
    >are incapable of understanding statistics
    These threads are very educational.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >are incapable of understanding statistics
      >men commit 99.99% of violent crime

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Like I said, you're stupid as frick.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          not my fault you can't understand statistics

  39. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you're not supposed to feed wild animals and especially bears you stupid b***h

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      YOU are not supposed to. bears are my friends and they want me to feed them

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You'll feed them alright, tubby.

  40. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Women are deranged and love beastiality. This was a bestseller in canada kek. Imagine flicking your bean to bear rape erotica

  41. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    for me the question comes down to what percentage of men would rape women if there was no consequences for it and rn I think that number is around 60%.
    but the rate of bear attack fatality is around 10-15%. plus I would rather die or get disabled rather than live as a rape victim.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >for me the question comes down to what percentage of men would rape women if there was no consequences for it and rn I think that number is around 60%.
      literally any observation of wartime or a college party with a girl passed out would suggest the number is significantly higher than that

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Link one decent source that suggests that

  42. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'd rather fight a bear than ask a woman out as well tbqh

  43. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't give a shit. I feel you wasted a minute of my life by making me initially think this thread was about something other than that dumb social media bullshit c**ts are on about.

  44. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Of course you choose the bear. You could just scare it off with your rotten shit breath, fatty.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *