whats the evolutionary reason for chasers
![]() Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
![]() Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
![]() Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Relationships uncensored
whats the evolutionary reason for chasers
![]() Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
![]() Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
![]() Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Tgirls still look like girls.
Same as how people like drinking soda even though it isn't healthy. It has attributes of flavor that derive from things that used to matter for evolutionary biology in the past.
yea but i heard many guys say that the penis makes it better and i dont get that
eye tracking studies of normal cishet guys watching straight porn showed they pay just as much if not more attention to the penis as breasts and ass. and pornhub data shows mtf porn is way more popular than the amount of guys who self describe as chasers or whatever. soo basically, male sexuality projects and interprets itself through the medium of the penis and trans girls having one makes them both easier to understand sexually and more attractive
this feels like some freud shit
not really rocket science to work out that guys feel sexual stuff through their dick lol
like when guys watch blowjob porn, they're basically just watching a dick and enjoying it
This is how it works for me.
thanks for being honest, most guys have some weird denial complex about it
attraction to secondary sex characteristics is far stronger than attraction to the primary sex characteristics. very reasonably a straight male could be only attracted to the female form but have no repulsion to penises (if they are on a female form)
for the preference of a penis (GAMP) i assume several factors
-some 'men' want to bottom for women (because they are repressing trannies)
-a penis has a more obvious response to arousal, stimulation, and climax. which in turn may arouse the male more to know what their partner is feeling.
-a penis on a female form is an inherent sign that she enjoys femininity, having intentionally changed her body in this way. men may also see this as a sign of submissiveness, again serving to arouse him
and im sure more reasons
For me it's not the penis.
You might not believe me, but I'm anonymous and don't really have anything to gain by lying.
What makes tgirls hot to me is the emasculation. The fact they used to be male and are now girls.
It's a bit of a sadism thing. I've only ever been with cis girls in real life but I think I'd be even more aroused by a tgirl because of that feeling of fricking someone who used to be just another guy but got altered into a cute little cumbawd who's submissive and needs to be held like a regular girl would.
Getting a tgf and then having her neutered would be peak romantic bonding too. Or srs to go even more extreme.
Trust me it's even better without failmale bullshit. They were fine, but being a woman is just better for them.
I'm just talking about my own fetish, not theirs.
I'm kinda proud of falling as male but because I was never a boy
to be filtered
There was a ecological niche for provide loving and affection for tranners. We stepped up to fill it (and you).
Its a developmental frickup not an evolutionary cause
sexual reproduction produces genetic variation, it doesn't provide a purpose for anything
why did god make it this way i dont like genetic variation
At first it was because I couldn't get girls. Then I actually had sex with a girl. Thought I was cured of my chaser tendencies until I saw cute boymoders on /passgen/. Then it all came rushing back.
I'm fricked for life...
Nah brother you're living the best life. To know pussy and reject it.
>evolutionary
>reason
you seem to be confused
i slept through biology sorry
implying that this process has agency or reason is just personifying it and turning it into God.
at this point your attempting to ask a theological question, not a biological one.
"chasers" are bishits that are too ugly/socially inept/scared to talk to cis women so they string along femboys and transwomen for sexual validation until they're confident enough to go for a cis woman
don't fall into it
so who do i date then
straight guys, bi guys, and agamp/chasers are all attracted to trans women
because of homo/transphobia it ends up that moat of the guys actively seeking out trannies online are the ones who fetishize us most, it's better to just meet guys irl who are attracted to you before they know you're trans
unless you don't pass then chasers are all you get sorry
date whoever you like and is attracted to you.
stop listening to schizos who give dating advices on same value as Andrew tate's dating advices
transbian psyop
ape see female
neuron activation
it ain't that complex
but im male
>but im male
t. boymoder number 162819 who clearly looks very feminine at this point to even pass as a man
Not everything has an evolutionary reason.
the evolutionary reason i drink dr pepper is because it tastes good
Nothing has an evolutionary "Reason"
Stop being autistic. Traits have reasons why they're selected for or against.
>Traits have reasons
nope, try again.
>if I only quote a fragment of a sentence that elides the part that makes it make sense, then I win
moron, traits have reasons for being selected. When someone says:
>what is the evolutionary reason for X
You can clarify what they're saying as:
>for what reason did nature select for X
Only people with absolutely crippling autism don't get that.
>evolutionary reason
that's not how evolution works
shut up gayel
you know i'm right. stop reversing cause and effect, teleology is gay
evolution is an emergent process of god but i agree mfs need to stop treating evolution like something planned or with purpose/intent
you are so insufferably autistic
yes, your point?
stop making other people suffer with your presence please
no
that's not how natural selection works. not all traits which are acquired are beneficial, they just don't lead to elimination of the gene by some disadvantage. only certain traits, typically those which influence procreation or lifespan, are positively selected. the existence of a trait doesn't mean it was 'selected', it just means it wasn't eliminated. if it's prominent/common it will have been reinforced for one reason or another
additionally, this isn't how evolutionary psychology works. it's not about developing automatic cognitive/sensory responses, it's about the capacity to create those pathways, to feel certain impulses such as hunger and sexual frustration and rage. the connection of these impulses to an object is a matter of developmental, not evolutionary, psychology. read freud's three essays on sexuality
oh my god nobody cares get a life
no
cope + seethe
rent free
I clarified that already, moron. The actual answer to OP's question is that the chaser trait hasn't had the opportunity to be expressed in a significant way until recently and so it's possible it won't be selected for at all. But if it is selected for, there will be a reason.
>the connection of these impulses to an object is a matter of developmental, not evolutionary, psychology
This isn't how evolution or genetics work. Even if something is the result of development there is a genetic basis for why the developmental process has that result. Every trait has genetics and development entangled this way. You can never isolate a trait and say it's exclusively the matter of one or the other.
bagel is moronic don't bother
this is partially correct but overemphasizes the importance of genetics over experience in the developmental process. unfortunately i can't go further into it rn, i have to go to work
still seething
>this is partially correct but overemphasizes the importance of genetics over experience in the developmental process
No, it's completely correct. Genetics and development are completely entangled, neither is more or less important than the other. You could have a specific trait with low heritability but that just means the variance of that trait within a population isn't majorly genetic, not that the trait itself isn't still based on genetics. Please don't talk about shit you know nothing about.
you're reducing this to traits in general, i'm specifically talking about psychological traits. people aren't hardwired for a language, their genetics inform their ability to learn and pronounce certain phonemes but these are ultimately the foundation for development, and the process of development is more influential on their use of language (accent, dialect, phrases, grammar, etc are informed by this). the same applies for psychology
what you said is true of anatomical traits, i never disputed that. i also never said genetics don't play a role, but it's important to not confuse the role genetics play in biological processes with genetic determinism/essentialism
kys
No, it's true of all traits including psychological ones. Which native language you speak is almost certainly going to have low heritability when looking at natural populations but that's not something innate to that trait. You could devise an environment where it has high heritability.
>being annoyed by troony autism
hownew.ru
stop samegayging bagel
i stg if i see another "evolutionary purpose" question i will do the unthinkable. frickers treat evolution as some literal omnipotent god.
I don't know I just think tranners are cute