>intelligence can be detected but is not found attractive
White women would rather marry an 80iq 6'4 chad than an 130iq 5'8 engineer
White women are dysgenic
Relationships uncensored
Relationships uncensored
>intelligence can be detected but is not found attractive
White women would rather marry an 80iq 6'4 chad than an 130iq 5'8 engineer
No shit, that's why we never used to let them vote. Now women are the majority of voters who control government policy, and there's no way to reverse it.
they dont find intelligence attractive. but they are, the world over, attracted to men with money and/or power, both of which flow from intelligence.
>attracted to men with money and/or power, both of which flow from intelligence.
I'd say they flow from psychopathy. Look at who controls the money supply.
>money and/or power, both of which flow from intelligence.
Yeah, no.
>attracted to men with money
Golddiggers are rare
Going from a low status job to a prestigious one made the average go from a 5.6/10 to a 6.8/10 that is to say 1.2 points higher. So for example if you are a 4/10 bartender and switched to surgeon you'd become a 5.2/10.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.12.008 (Wang 2018)
This is also in line with this study which stated that making TEN TIMES your current salary would mean at most 2 points more in an attractiveness scale. So if you are a 4/10 making 60k, you'd be a 6/10 making 600k. good luck getting that salary bump.
http://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.12.2014.1.1 (Dunn 2014)
Photoshopping a man into a luxury apartment made women rate him as around 1.2 points more attractive. The same manipulation had no significant effect on men rating women. Being rich as hell with a lavish lifestyle made the subject go from a 4.4/10 to a 5.6/10
https://archive.is/Y9xuc
"Job status/prestige are not significant determinants of initial interest on Tinder, for both men and women". So women don't care if you are a teacher or a neurosurgeon. Note that women STILL want you to be college educated and earn around the same as them, so don't even try it tradies.
http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/eli-finkel/documents/EastwickFinkel2008_JPSP.pdf
It is Looks > Personality > Money for both genders
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3441116
"Greater income does not buy more sex, nor more sexual partners" Note that it applies to both genders
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40806-017-0092-x
"We conclude that a minimum level of physical attractiveness is a necessity for both women and their mothers and that when women and their parents state that other traits are more important than physical attractiveness, they assume potential mates meet a minimally acceptable standard of physical attractiveness."
tl;dr you'd need an unrealistic boost in your income for a little bump in attractiveness
>Golddiggers are rare
all women are gold diggers of last ersort:
>conclude that a minimum level of physical attractiveness is a necessity for both women and their mothers
> We assessed mate preferences among 61 daughter-mother pairs using an experimental design varying target men’s physical attractiveness and trait profiles.
what's the experiment design? shit abstract by Black folk
dunno how they did it, but
>come in as mother and daughter
>what kind of men do you prefer?
lmao yeah, that will encourage honesty
post the link, you stupid niger
The link is literally there dumbass
When was intelligence ever attractive outside of sapiophiles?
women are never -philes.
eg women teacher pedos are pedo for little chads vs typical male pedos who exploit vulnerable youth as easy prey, which is why female pedos are caught so quickly (vs male pedos getting caught after their vics get therapy/religion).
>sapiophiles
sounds made up.
>Sapiophile (n.) (archaic)
it means what it sounds like.
no woman is one. This suffices as a description of eomen, they are attracted to the six:
pic highly related.
politics: civilization requires nonmoronic babies.
this is true af, most women are stupid and love stupid men.
Women are far more organized and cunning than men in some ways. You can't have someone rule over you and claim they are stupid. Women openly rule over men, so they must be doing something clever.
>Women openly rule over men, so they must be doing something clever
nah, it's just sexual manipulation, feminism taught them them to use men's sexual desires at their advantage. since men have very high libido, it's easy for women to get what they want with only their pussy, even if they're stupid
>You can't have someone rule over you and claim they are stupid.
Liars are not leaders, they are losers, you don't call conmen leaders just because they lied and some people believed thenlm.
A leader is something antithetical to the womanly way.
Incidentally, there are four topics women discuss, and a sort of running theme. The running theme is basically tge stoey of their life, in a sense women are tatted upon their time whatever things came about. When talking to each other, they are basically comparing timeline tattos. Which is why males can discuss with old women a wider range of their lives without difficulty, whereas young women can only discuss what's already been along the way foe them, little girls have no capacity for the tales, so they merely are subject to the instruction, which scarcely can imprint.
the 4:
>their lovers, and exes
>famous people, and local celebs / popular people
>her body, whether dyes to hair, aches
>"wow" stuff like famous things old things. superlatives, always with a largeness (but may have contrasting smallness. travel, venice, grand canyon, mammoth caves, the moon, exotic interaction conveyances like carriage rides etc)
women talk about all of these continuously, and easily, because they are like 4 track drum pads, it's just 4 things - EVER.
i'd rather mary a 10/10 80iq girl than a 4/10 200iq girl, what's the problem? just stop being unattractive
Pro tip: research at minimum needs 2 replications, by unaffiliated entities.
My IQ is in the 150s but I try to hide it as best as I can. Women don't like intelligent men, their preferences are dysgenic
No need to hide it, except to keep other guys from wienerblocking. Read picrel:
note the six.
see, iq, artistry, whatever, means far less to women as a freckle on your big toe.
How do they define intelligence in the study?
you really don't need a study for this if you observed dating in your early 20s, but what's interesting is not that intelligence isn't selected, it's that intelligence is selected against. and what's even funnier is that they select for extraversion, so they're selecting low iq talkative men lmao. the comments are all cope, guys really don't want let go of the "women choose the best genetics" meme
There is a terrorism which stalks married men. What if she doesn't actually like you?
Deep down they know women don't like the personality existence of their men.
they know.