Why are moids so much into virgins? I'm a virgin because I have a low sex drive and I don't like men.
 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
Why are moids so much into virgins? I'm a virgin because I have a low sex drive and I don't like men.
Relationships uncensored
It strokes our fragile egos
Asexual = Not turned on by you
If a woman wants a serious relationship with you and she tell you she's not a virgin, you say in your head "Ok.. 4 or 5 is OK."
When she then says "Yeah I've had about 50 or 60 flings.", it then becomes "Holy shit that means I'm 61." and then ghost.
When that number is larger, there's a perceived instability. She couldn't make up her mind after 60 dicks so you're even less likely to stay together. Even if she says "4 or 5", dudes will not be 100% certain she's telling the truth and it's always a risk in our heads.
Wanting a virgin is a cope though, because there's always the chance you're just the first before the second. There's always a bigger fish.
this
is exactly what I mean.
Thank you for demonstrating.
The past doesn't matter, what matters is now she is interested in you. You ruin it with meaningless incel calculations that only hurt your self esteem
>The past doesn't matter, what matters is now she is interested in you
For now kek. I bet that's what 59 thought.
Just lie to them if you want to frick them up that badly.
>The past doesn't matter
Nobody genuinely believes that. They might believe their past doesn't matter, but as far as anybody else goes, in all sorts of matters, past is always taken into account.
>The past doesn't matter
>I don't know how to take accountability for my behavior, I've severely damaged my credibility as a potential mate through reckless sexual misadventure, and you should ignore more red flags than a Chinese parade because I need the resources you can provide
You would be surprised how most people understate their past. Some guys on here think that having a porn watching past is not a big deal
lol holy shit as if this site couldnt get more puritan
Who says she changed? She did it, the burden of proof is on her. "The past doesn't matter" is obfuscating this burden of proof, and counts as proof of there being no proof because there has been no change.
You would ignore the perfect girl for you because she had sex before lol.
It's just male insecurity, not burden of proof.
>"perfect girl"
>... has sex with other men
Thx for the insight into your personal tastes. Will that be all?
When has the past NOT mattered? Past performance indicates future behavior.
Trying to get into college? good luck telling an Ivy League school that "my high school grades were abysmal, but I'm changed now, just trust me".
Applying for a new job? They're gonna want to know your employment history and how long you've stuck around at each job.
You want a kidney transplant? They're gonna want to look at your history of alcohol and substance abuse.
Your past matters in every aspect of your life, but it somehow DOESN'T matter in sex and relationships?
>Asexual = Not turned on by you
This.
(You).
That's a funny post
I wanted a virgin because I wanted a woman that was only mine I guess
>she should have told me
That dumb Black person could have asked? Am I supposed to have sympathy for that post? Am I supposed to have sympathy for any virgin who cannot manage to do something I did when I was 16 years old?
Ask if she is asexual?
You sound like a virgin. Everyone has sex. Some wait till marriage. Some marriages end up sexless. Asexual is a new age thing that is hair silly. No one should have to ask if your asexual.
i am going to start larping as a virgin now if thats what men want
Sex is only meant for making babies, because lying on your back for hours won't get the household chores and cooking down.
>household chores
Takes an hour or less to tidy up a house.
>cooking
Takes an hour or less to cook and eat
There are plenty of hours in the day for sex you dweeb but you live in a pig sty I guess
You should at least disclose your fricking sexuality before getting married. WTF?!
She is definitely taking advantage of him. This would be ok grounds for divorce.
it's because virgins are the only ones who don't know what they're missing out on, so they're the only ones who might genuinely love me over the billions of people who are superior
If you're the only lover she ever has known she won't miss the previous ones.
No, more seriously the real reason is that men are disgusting and if a woman has sex with disgusting creatures she becomes disgusting too, in direct proportion to the number of men she was with.
I'm 7.2"x6" and that's the fakest, most moronic shit I've ever seen.
And no, her ex wasn't 7" girth, that's not physically possible. would be like a 9" long dick.
Top comment on that is
>Suicide fuel
Also someone suggested opening the relationship and letting the bf be a cuck, he got downvoted at least.
90% chance that screencap is just smut. You morons will read people's cuck smut stories and take them as real events without question way too easily.
That's honestly different. You should disclose your sexuality before dating.
And to answer the question, SOME people find restraint and discipline very attractive. Knowing that someone makes a conscious choice to avoid something that goes against their beliefs and values while fighting societal pressure to cave in is extremely attractive to a lot of people.
Implied loyalty
>being loyal to your first relationship
Lol
More likely than with any other
Most people have had multiple relationships so no
>why doesn't the US army recruit people who used to be in the Russian army
Lol this b***h isn't asexual... she's chadsexual
>90% of men are somehow Chad
What the hell are you talking about
>>90% of men are somehow Chad
At most 10% of men are chads
>Why are moids so much into virgins?
because pic related is the alternative
Because Im a virgin myself so I believe that the way I view sex and relationships is very different to the way a woman who has a lot of sex views relationships. Something special to me would just be boring and routine to her, and my inexperience and nerves would probably just turn her off and annoy her. We wouldnt be able to connect at all and neither of us would come out of the relationship happy. I dont mind if shes not a virgin but I dont think I would be able to manage a relationship with anyone who uses dating apps
While I understand where you're coming from, the overwhelming majority of virgins I've met have been on dating apps. In fact, I think I've dated more virgins than non-virgins.
Dating apps aren't just for hookups, I've used them to find several relationships (and my current virgin gf).
>Why are moids so much into virgins?
Everyone is.
I am saving myself for my future wife. If she loves me she will save herself for her future husband.
1) Statistics
2) Sex with used goods grosses me out
3) Intuition
>1995
What the frick? Imagine how much worse it is now
It quite literally cant be worse because the guy who made those fake charts got fired a long time ago
>correlation is causation
oof dont breed
>inb4 roastie
>shit, someone pointed out an observable pattern
>>>c-correlation doesn't e-equal causation g-guys
God i hate you homosexuals. It's not even particular to this example, there's just always at least one of you coming out of the woodwork thinking that this line is the ultimate shutdown.
You can observe it in the real world much more easily. Virgin girls are ugly as shit and not worth your time
Like i said, not about this example. I was talking specifically about "muh causation" homosexualry. It's a fedora-tier comeback.
>are ugly as shit
Subjective
>not worth your time
You cannot say that because you are not me.
this is unironically not a defense in the slightest
its genuinely midwit behavior to form an opinion, look for data to support that opinion, and then correlate the data to cause the opinion. Your like 3 steps deep into midwittery
if you are mad people are less easily programmed than you, than you need to take a step back and take a good long look at yourself in the mirror and realize you are a fricking moron
All your insults are worthless if you are a used goods defender
see:
Case in point though, assuming the graph isn't just made up bullshit, it's a perfectly valid point.
>i don't date women with high body count because they have issues
>show's graph that shows link between high body count and issues
The graph isn't the end-all-be-all i win button, but it helps make a point.
But no, "muh causation!!!1!!1"
see:
original post correction n shiet
is causation
Irrelevant if it is or not in this case
If a girls had 50 dicks in her before you, she always compares you to them consciously or subconsciously and is way more likely to become resentful and leave you out of boredom or whatever. This is an observable thing women do, yet women will still call you an insecure baby for preferring to not have a partner who does this.
Having a reasonable body count for your age with a history of LTRs is also preferable. A woman who's been on the carousel is a ticking timebomb.
Did you know that if a woman has just ONE premarital sex partner, her chance of divorce goes from 18% to over 40%? That's unacceptable when no fault divorce exists, and women initiate 80% of divorces. Stats aside, I'm just not in to the idea of my wife and mother of my children having experienced the highest forms of physical intimacy and emotional bonding with other men. I want us to be able to give ourselves to each other completely, with no baggage and nothing held back