Why can't women understand that they do in fact owe men sex?

Nta, but cope harder
It's the truth, no matter what your bubble tells you.
Without men, women would be in shambles.

go tell this to your moms

Tbh the type of woman who wants to become a mom is usually like this. Most girls I know in university are pretty ambitious in their career and life goals. But I also know one girl who literally just wants to marry a richer guy and be a sahm.

>They don't build wealth
That's just entirely wrong, though. There are women-owned businesses, CEOs and such. Not as many as men, but there are women who build wealth.

as long as you acknowledge that you're wrong. why not consider small businesses?

Don't have to.
She already rushes to a man for help whenever she has a problem.
Car breaks down? Please with nearest bystander male for help.
Talks shit and acts like she has answers, but when stumped? Cries to nearest male.
If she can't have her way with me and I push back and even reject her, calls her ex husband and professional moron simp (my father) to try and bully me back into giving her what she wants.

You're not fooling anyone. You're deluded and coddled, overgrown children who ironically call incels entitled as you demand the world and contribute nothing. Unlike incels, you can actually get away with it because vegana.

No it's not that, it's your snarky, hostile, feminine demeanor. The fact that you disagreed with me had nothing to do with my assumption.

>people who think certain things must behave certain ways are generally just autistic
Not really, applying observed patterns to your judgement is simply a sign of having at least average intelligence.

>it's spelled judgment
My mistake.
>a rigidity in what patterns you recognize
Maybe so, but it could just as well be an attempt at pilpul after you were found out. I guess I'll never know.

Cope with what? Your presence? I don't think I can

>How do you know? What about all the incels working in the tech industry? Even richer guys like techlead aren't safe

It would be hard to say since incels can be a variety of peoples. I come to this conclusion mainly because
>Some incels follow the blackpill philosophy, which is likely to have some detrimental effects on your own mental state just based on the negativity of it. This is ignoring whether blackpills are true or false.
>Loneliness would make them less likely to participate within society which is a common problem among incels
>The poster had an assumption himself that this is true, of course there is likely to be at least plenty of incels who do so, but you could likely apply this to 'chad' as well. Why would you settle for an incel when you could have chad? The hypothetical chad would have an advantage that would overall make them more likely to be successful.

Outside of that, most are likely disposable rather than anyone important. Genetics still matter too, because better genetics would then make you more likely to build, create, and maintain in meaningful ways. The whole point here is that its possible but being an incel, would make you more likely to have a harder time fitting into society and doing anything meaningful, at least that would be worth fricking from a genetics standpoint when there would be better options.

>First off, you have to define what you mean by better genetics
This is hard to answer from a personal perspective as I don't buy into this mentality, it's completely awful when taken to its most fricked up extreme.
Either way, it was made unclear in the first place, I think the thing that has us stuck here is that different things require different strengths. To keep it simple though, we would need those who are physically attractive(to create a positive feedback loop to make them more likely to be successful aka Chad), intelligence, or being physically capable/possessing physical strength. If you are to remove physical attractiveness, they'd need to not be ugly in the eyes of society and be significant enough in other ways (intelligence) in order to be 'worth' breeding with. It's also based entirely on the economic positions of the person, which is outside of the incels control. Chances are if you are an incel who is intelligent but poor, you won't be getting the education and support that is necessary to maxx your value compared to someone who is intelligent and rich. You are then left with being physically capable, I use capable as I imagine for most jobs being a physical prodigy is unnecessary.
Lets take the best case scenario here, incels are probably more likely to be at least above average intelligence. You still need the proper support in order to bring up your value.

>For example, these guys would be discarded as trash nowadays, but if you look at the big picture instead of the female point of view and consider their work, they were actually superhuman.

Would they really though? From my own perspective this goes back to my point before, intellectual prodigies don't often go swept under the rug, and if they do it's most likely due to a lack of good support. Most incels aren't doing this though.

This is completely unrelated to your argument and questions, but I think deserving sex is essentially pointless when it can be bought.

>mafia-like of you
Regardless of how I frame it, it's the truth. If I had a different point of view, it would still be the truth.

>if i can take it, it's mine
by this logic, you owe your ass to any homosexual who can pin you down.
you are using the logic of baboons. part of why humans evolved onto better things is because we figured out higher societal order is ideal for protecting resources, and in that way we've managed long term projects that no other animal can even begin to approach.

this is the absolute gayest thing i've ever seen on NSFFW. beyond /b/, beyond /soc/. i hope you lift. or at least i hope you're bi.