Why do people here think that teaching teenagers about how to have safe sex. (sex ed) Is a bad thing, and '''GrOoMiNg'''. Yes this includes teaching them about gay sex because gay students do exist and the purpose of sex ed is to reduce all po0ssible harm related to sex.
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
30 years ago you would be beaten half to death in Ireland for saying that
Oh hey Gershon. lol you get to learn some of my backstory in this thread.
ok? not anymore lol
His best friend just died a CISO of a major corporation.
Cease and desist or this will get very ugly, for you.
I was groomed by a glowie who has a house in Virginia and a whole room just for Legos(tm).
Unless you're being groomed my a Mason, they're doing it wrong.
Where in va?
Gay sex isn't really sex sticking your dick in poo is bad
gay sex is sex? your ass is partly a sexual organ.
because teenagers will have sex, we cant stop that, so we might aswell try and reduce the harm caused by a lack of knowledge of safe sex right? if a teacher wanted to take advantage of a student, he would do it anyway.
why not? why does the state need to teach about maths and history?
I said teenagers, about 15 I'd say is the right age, sex ed is trying to reduce the harm caused by a lack of knowledge for safe sex, so yeah, this includes how to not harm yourself or others whilst having anal sex, I know you think its icky, but grow up man.
>your ass is partly a sexual organ.
No its not.
Why do males have a prostate then?
there is no need to teach it to younger children.
the majority of people groomers is targeted to are the ones wanting to teach or show kids the sexually explicit content
Prostate has nothing to do with sex you degenerate, you can coom from any simulation on your body if you're psychology conditioned (broken) enough to reinforce it
Males have prostate to provide fluid to sperms. Any pleasure part is purely post-modern extrapolation.
Why does it provide pleasure when touched? why doesnt that happen when you touch anything thats not a sexual organ
A working one is like a pump and a switch for urine and semen. A healthy one does not over-inflate into the rectum. Its a sign of cancer, illness, or gay worms.
>because teenagers will have sex, we cant stop that, so we might aswell try and reduce the harm caused by a lack of knowledge of safe sex right? if a teacher wanted to take advantage of a student, he would do it anyway.
You know most teachers are female right? And that most school abuses are female on male right? And that parents should teach about sex to their children not strangers in a public place right?
Parents can be irresponsible.
bla bla bla slippery slope etc
The slippery slope is probably not a fallacy because we have seen it in action multiple times. They used to say "we wont be trying to teach your children to be gay it will be behind closed doors." Now look where it is now.
This.
We're cooking frogs and they gaslight us that the water ain't cooking.
>They used to say "we wont be trying to teach your children to be gay
slippery slope go wheeeeee
In twenty years we've gone from men in decades long monogamous relationships wanting to get hitched to having kiddie drag shows, a push to normalize polyamory, etc.
I hate to admit it because I was Pro-LGBT at one dumb point. But the Fundies were right, or dare I say, optimistic in their predictions.
>the Fundies were right, or dare I say, optimistic
read 2 Kings 22 carefully to understand what manasseh was up to
two kinds of people are obsessed with pleasure
* rich wastrels who think theyre entitled to it
* prostitutes whose job it is to provide it
wait no its 2 Kings 23 the same story from 2 Kings 22 but the verse that needs to be considered is 23:7
> And he brake down the houses of the sodomites, that were by the house of the LORD, where the women wove hangings for the grove.
heres the Biblical perspective on how adults become sodomites
>bla bla bla slippery
>Parents can be irresponsible
What makes you think government drones would be more responsible? The parents made the kid, so they usually at least have some interest in the kid's well-being. The teacher gets paid no matter what.
if a zebra mother isnt part of a harem, the next zebra who wants her will murder her baby in front of her. historically you hear stories about the step mom who was cold towards her step daughter but when the mom gets custody of the kids she will pimps out her own daughters to get a man for herself
They don't stop at teenagers Seamus. That's the main issue. They introduce this shit as young as they can, in as much detail as possible.
Do 7 year olds need to know what a clitoris is? What gender fluidity is? What is the type of person who wants to push that onto kids, teach kids that?
https://www.njspotlightnews.org/2022/05/nj-se-ed-guidelines-controversy-firestorm-westfield-parents-vin-gopal-fox-news-republican-campaign-issue/
>gay sex is sex? your ass is partly a sexual organ
citation required
Why would you let complete strangers ~~*teach your kids about sex*~~?
I wouldn't trust the people who want to enthusiastically teach 8 year olds the mechanisms of anal sex and kink to teach sex ed. Sex ed should be at most teaching how to use a condom and how babies are made.
If a gay kid wants to know the intricacies of gay sex he can certainly find it out on his own.
Why do the teachers, so basically the state, need to do this?
An adult who is talking about anal sex (and how it's normal) with children must be gulaged straight to the uranium mines asap. Dixi.
The commies were right. They kept homosex illegal till '91
>sex
>reproduction
Gays don't have sex anon. They perform sodomy.
The ass is partly a sexual organ.
Even if it involves a sexual organ the use of it is not used for sex. It's still sodomy.
sodomy is a religious term, most schools have grown out of that, what are you trying to establish here? I never said gays can reproduce.
You said they can have sex. They do not actually have sex because sex involves reproduction. Also. I am not establishing anything. It's obvious.
I'm not debating you on pedantic definitions lmao
>syntax
This isn't a debate. It's an annihilation.
Why are you posting a picture of a cartoon little girl while asking this question OP?
I just picked a random pic in my anime folder idk
Post your bussy.
> safe sex
is within marriage
>le christianity
gay sex is not natural therefore it is grooming
you are teaching them about something they'd never regularly do in a sane mind
if you disagree you are mentally ill and can go have a nice day for all I care
if it was natural there wouldn't be all this inorganic push back about trying to teach kids about it and you know thats the truth
thats why you gays immediately victimize yourselves for your gay weird shit you do for sympathy
Why isn't gay sex natural?
Its fine for them to be taught the basics on reproduction and stuff like that, but when you start getting into fetishes and kinks it is fricking weird and needs to stop. Teaching kids about being gay is not necessary because gay is not the norm and is basically a disturbing fetish because sex is for reproduction. You do not need to be teaching children to be hedonists.
> gay students do exist and the purpose of sex ed is to
Nah you just want to tell all kids about how buttsex is normal. Otherwise you would separate students into gay and non gay classes.
seperating them would be discriminatory and incredibly humiliating for the students, you just find it icky.
Then you just want to tell all children about how buttsex is good and natural.
when I was in middle school ages 12-14 sex-ed was covered alongside the general reproductive information and was done in health class. It didn't need it's own full semester or year long class. It wasn't taught to kids in elementary school. There were no props or videos or cartoons about it
ok?
the issue isn't teaching teenagers the appropriate material the issue is how its taught and that it is also pushed on younger kids
No the issue is all of it. I’m tired of you lukewarm centrist homosexuals. “You can’t teach kids about degenerate extramarital sex… until they’re TEENAGERS!” The only appropriate sex is heterosexual sex within marriage and it’s not the state job to teach them how to sin.
I'm not for teaching them so they know how to do it but I think it's a good idea to give them information so they learn how their bodies work. No amount of proper information will make a teenager want to have more or less sex and I put the blame entirely on the parents for raising a deviant
Sex education has only increased promiscuity and stopped people from having children. Its decay pure and simple. The promised result was not what we got. Stay away from other peoples children you fricking groomer.
Please show me how it increased promiscuity.
before adultery was legalized most people only had 1 lifetime sex partner
>Please show me how it increased promiscuity.
Behold reality.
Nothing wrong with sex ed, it was part of the biology program at my school and it was given by an educated biology teacher instead of a perverted drag queen or a gay in a gimp suit.
Modern sex ed is cultural marxist propoganda taught by unqualified perverts to kids that are way too young and that is the real probpem.
>being gay is natural
>kids can't figure it out on their own i have to help them :^)
pick one
That is completely not what I'm saying, I'm saying that gay teenagers will engage in gay sex whether we like it or not. therefore we should teach them how to do it safely.
lmao go back to bed grandpa
it's literally the same as normal sex ed. wear a rubber and don't frick 100 different people. everything else is fetish shit that the "teachers" get off to
>the purpose of sex ed is to reduce all po0ssible harm related to sex.
so it should be "anal sex is damaging and improper and should not be attempted by anyone"?
Because it is, it's fine to explain how the reproducting system works, and what the mating process is, what men look for and women look for. But that's not what they are teaching at "sex ed".
What they teach at sex ed is left wing propaganda designed to destroy the family unit.
Ok, so you need a 15 minute lesson about don't frick people in the ass because it causes ruptures/injuries, and if you don't want babies use any of the availible contraception options, which all come with instructions.
The quesiton is, why would you need more than 15 minutes of common sense considering biology is still a class. At least it was the last time i heard about it.
Because it is grooming.
>luv da lord
>'ate queers
>simple as
cringe
Statistically sex education leads to teenagers having more sex and same goes for drug education.
Sex education is simple
The telos of sex is procreation, therefore sexual behavior needs to be directed towards that end for it to be moral
You don't have a right to have sex however you want, you only have a right to do what is right, and that is natural sexual intercourse towards the natural end of family formation