20% of white men are over 6' and 29% of white men are millionaires. 80% of women are over weight, so if you arent at least a 6' tall millionaire, you dont deserve a hot woman
from your source website >76% of millionaires in the U.S. are White. White people, who are not Hispanic or Latino, make up about 60% of the U.S. population. >8% of millionaires in the U.S. are Black. Black people make up about 14% of the U.S. population. >8% of millionaire in the U.S. identify as Asian. Asians make up 6% of the U.S. population. >7% of millionaires in the U.S. identify as Hispanic or Latino. Hispanic and Latinos make up about 19% of the U.S. population
First of all, notice how there aren't any israelites in this statistic
Second of all """identify as hispanic or latino""", only 19% of the population
Third of all, that demographic source is just plain wrong. >https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/08/united-states-adult-population-grew-faster-than-nations-total-population-from-2010-to-2020.html
there are like 260 million adults / over 18yo's in the US, not just 209 million
fourth of all >20% of white men are over 6' and 29% of white men are millionaires. 80% of women are over weight, so if you arent at least a 6' tall millionaire, you dont deserve a hot woman
you're assuming that all white men over 6' are among the "supposed" 29% millionaires when those stats are largely independent of each other, and you have to take 1/5th of 29% or 5.8% for the real number of millionaires over 6'
fifth of all not 80% of women are overweight >Percent of adults age 20 and older with obesity: 41.9% >Percent of adults age 20 and older with overweight, including obesity: 73.6% (2017-2018)
sixth of all
https://loseitirc.github.io/visualbmi/#
a lot of "overweight" (NOT OBESE) women can be hot as frick. go to this website, and look at people who are "overweight" (e.g. 150-170 lbs girls at 5'5")
A girl with a BMI of e.g. 26 is per definition "overweight", but can look totally fine, especially if she has big breasts and ass.
A woman ate the fricking apple and expelled humanity from paradise, it’s one of the oldest archetypal themes of humanity for a reason. Women are selfish, impulsive, emotional creatures who would be treated like the vapid prostitutes they are if it weren’t for their monopoly on reproduction.
Women will do that to other women, but when a man's involved the pussy Mafia always backs each other no matter what outrageous thing one of them is doing. It's important to differentiate between women v women interactions and women v men interactions. Try it yourself sometime, criticise something about a woman or women around other women and watch them all fall into line like a bunch of unionists at a picket protest.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
They will also tell most men to their face that he is 10/10 (unless there is some previously established animosity) and they are more likely to criticize another woman to her face than they are to a man because they are deceptive cowards, but given the same algorithmic anonymity that they were afforded when they rated the OP's pic, I wonder how they tend to rate other women and how men rate men since I think the women one would like like the top and men rating men like the bottom since women objectively are more attractive and men more functional since that is was the selection criteria for their respective evolutions.
oohh white boi is unhappy cause a woman won't call him beautiful.
go and live with homosexuals who will frick you in your ass and call you princess.
when did we start caring about male beauty? what a homosexual world we are living in. Why don't you start wearing makeup like korean men so that women will find you beautiful
with all your history of homosexualry, you have to care about male beauty. I give you an exception.
rest of the world wouldn't care about male beauty standards.
What does this picture I've seen a hundred times already is supposed to mean, exactly? If anything, it means that men who are using dating apps (specifically OkCupid) are less attractive and desperate (also, it's probably full of non-Whites) which is kinda makes sense. Am I correct?
It shows that men grade looks on a normal bell curve. Of course the majority of girls would be average, it's what average means. Then it shows women are much more judgemental, and that to them an "average" man is extremely rare. Not because they are rare, but because women are c**ts.
no, it means women are delusional and rate men very harshly while men rate women realistically
All I'm saying that you have to keep in mind what kind of people participated in that study from 2017. Before pandemic, meeting people was way easier. You have to expect really desperate and unlucky with women type of men there. >no, it means women are delusional and rate men very harshly while men rate women realistically
I don't know about women but men tend overrate the opposite sex.
This isn’t 2000 anon. Most people use or have used a dating app. Even good looking people. All my good looking friends got fricks and dates from these apps. Us average guys get nothing.
I honestly don't even care lol. I have everything. Career, home, car, 6ft, 6pack, 6inch+. 355 bench! 355! I don't care. I don't even remotely bother with women. Never have, and I'm 28! The best part is that I know tons of women who are ALONE. That's right, not even hooking up. But then again it must be hard to hook up when half of the males are gross Indians, lol! But they get what they deserve!
Frick women, not literally of course. Shoutout to all the bros and friends on here that simply DONT CARE.
I think this is a phenomenon of women fricking so many different guys.
women are designed to have only one mate.
If they have more than one, they don't compare their following future mates with their individual previous mates, but an amalgamation of the best traits of all their previous mates.
e.g. >Tyrone had a 8" wiener >Jeff had a 6 pack >Tyler made $200k/year >Matt was 6'3 >Noah was super handsome
In her mind she will not compare all future potential mates with just her past mates on an individual level, but all of them combined, so her next guy must have >a bigger dick than Tyrone >more defined muscles than Jeff >higher income than Tyler >taller than Matt >more handsome than Noah
all in one.
and just failing in any individual of the listed aspects makes you a "subpar" mating choice and she'll rate you "below average" despite any man who fulfills just 3 out of the 5 listed requirements in this example easily being among the top 20% of men at least.
It simply comes from the fact that women control the supply of pussy. The only thing holding them in check before was patriarchy.
In more primitive times women would have no issue sharing one powerful man amongst themselves, and now we're back to that arrangement.
>In more primitive
you have to get reeeal primitive for that one though.
like pre-agricultural revolution, hunter-gatherer 10,000 BC primitive.
All civilized societies even in ancient times had some system of distribution for pussy.
Sure, the powerful rulers still had harems with dozens of women, usually the hottest ones, but they had to make sure that ~80ish% of his beta subjects also got some pussy.
Sure, but that's what I'm saying, we've gone back to primitive mating strategies.
In a very real sense civilisation can only be maintained when restricting women's behaviour.
12,000 years is nothing when you consider the fact that humans have been around for like 50 million years. 12,000 years is only like 0.01% of our evolution. We're very much the same as we were 12,000 years ago.
I don't see how this is an issue. If I go on Tinder right now, I have thousands of matches and thousands of men messaging me. Am I supposed to reply to all of them? Of course, I'm gonna find the hottest and initiate conversation. Would you bother with the ugly girls if you had that many people on Tinder giving you attention?
>I don't know. I'm not exactly attracted to a man with a vegana either.
"Man with a vegana"?
What?
Are you moronic? You 'avin a giggle m8?
A "Man with a vegana" is a masculine woman.
The exact opposite of a tomboy.
Here, you seem a bit moronic or misguided, so I'll explain the difference :
- Tomboy : A Tomboy is a Woman that ACTS feminine, but has generally Masculine interests.
- Masculine Woman : A Masculine Woman is a woman who ACTS like a man (Aggressive, Disagreable, Conflict-oriented, "I'm strong and independant) but has generally Feminine Interests.
Do you understand better now?
I agree on principle that "A Man with a vegana" s not attractive, but you're confusing Tomboys, which are Based and Feminine (where it counts) with Maculine (Modern/Feminist/BossBabe) Women who actually are masculinne and threfore unattractive.
I hope women die in the most painful way possible
Why are women such horrible creatures?
a bullet to the head is enough
20% of white men are over 6' and 29% of white men are millionaires. 80% of women are over weight, so if you arent at least a 6' tall millionaire, you dont deserve a hot woman
How many gorillionaires are israeli dwarves.
from your source website
>76% of millionaires in the U.S. are White. White people, who are not Hispanic or Latino, make up about 60% of the U.S. population.
>8% of millionaires in the U.S. are Black. Black people make up about 14% of the U.S. population.
>8% of millionaire in the U.S. identify as Asian. Asians make up 6% of the U.S. population.
>7% of millionaires in the U.S. identify as Hispanic or Latino. Hispanic and Latinos make up about 19% of the U.S. population
First of all, notice how there aren't any israelites in this statistic
Second of all """identify as hispanic or latino""", only 19% of the population
Third of all, that demographic source is just plain wrong.
>https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/08/united-states-adult-population-grew-faster-than-nations-total-population-from-2010-to-2020.html
there are like 260 million adults / over 18yo's in the US, not just 209 million
fourth of all
>20% of white men are over 6' and 29% of white men are millionaires. 80% of women are over weight, so if you arent at least a 6' tall millionaire, you dont deserve a hot woman
you're assuming that all white men over 6' are among the "supposed" 29% millionaires when those stats are largely independent of each other, and you have to take 1/5th of 29% or 5.8% for the real number of millionaires over 6'
fifth of all not 80% of women are overweight
>Percent of adults age 20 and older with obesity: 41.9%
>Percent of adults age 20 and older with overweight, including obesity: 73.6% (2017-2018)
sixth of all
https://loseitirc.github.io/visualbmi/#
a lot of "overweight" (NOT OBESE) women can be hot as frick. go to this website, and look at people who are "overweight" (e.g. 150-170 lbs girls at 5'5")
A girl with a BMI of e.g. 26 is per definition "overweight", but can look totally fine, especially if she has big breasts and ass.
Conclusion: you are moronic.
Because I learned of their true nature, of what they really are. So I cannot help but hate them and the weak men who enable them.
I only hate human women.
hating women because they don't want to have sex with you is a silly reason
your pic implies that women dislike me more than i them
A woman ate the fricking apple and expelled humanity from paradise, it’s one of the oldest archetypal themes of humanity for a reason. Women are selfish, impulsive, emotional creatures who would be treated like the vapid prostitutes they are if it weren’t for their monopoly on reproduction.
I don't hate them I just wish they'd all go get eaten by bears already and stop posting about it on social media.
How do they rate other women?
How do men rate other men?
The pussy Mafia will always rate other women as 10/10.
Women hate each other though and always try to tear other women down, have you ever actually met a woman?
Women will do that to other women, but when a man's involved the pussy Mafia always backs each other no matter what outrageous thing one of them is doing. It's important to differentiate between women v women interactions and women v men interactions. Try it yourself sometime, criticise something about a woman or women around other women and watch them all fall into line like a bunch of unionists at a picket protest.
They will also tell most men to their face that he is 10/10 (unless there is some previously established animosity) and they are more likely to criticize another woman to her face than they are to a man because they are deceptive cowards, but given the same algorithmic anonymity that they were afforded when they rated the OP's pic, I wonder how they tend to rate other women and how men rate men since I think the women one would like like the top and men rating men like the bottom since women objectively are more attractive and men more functional since that is was the selection criteria for their respective evolutions.
I love women
You just need to surround yourselves with good people, and work on being a better person yourself
I don't hate women. Women, however, hate me.
>inb4 why
I'm literally 5'8'' lmao
oohh white boi is unhappy cause a woman won't call him beautiful.
go and live with homosexuals who will frick you in your ass and call you princess.
when did we start caring about male beauty? what a homosexual world we are living in. Why don't you start wearing makeup like korean men so that women will find you beautiful
>when did we start caring about male beauty?
we have to care, we can't just rape women like you do
with all your history of homosexualry, you have to care about male beauty. I give you an exception.
rest of the world wouldn't care about male beauty standards.
άσε μας ρε μαλάκα πακιστανέ
चोदतु त्वं रक्तरंजितः
i'm sorry for what i said, i am trying to work on my anger management
Shitrope is a gay matriarchy
Robowaifus don’t care about height
What does this picture I've seen a hundred times already is supposed to mean, exactly? If anything, it means that men who are using dating apps (specifically OkCupid) are less attractive and desperate (also, it's probably full of non-Whites) which is kinda makes sense. Am I correct?
It shows that men grade looks on a normal bell curve. Of course the majority of girls would be average, it's what average means. Then it shows women are much more judgemental, and that to them an "average" man is extremely rare. Not because they are rare, but because women are c**ts.
All I'm saying that you have to keep in mind what kind of people participated in that study from 2017. Before pandemic, meeting people was way easier. You have to expect really desperate and unlucky with women type of men there.
>no, it means women are delusional and rate men very harshly while men rate women realistically
I don't know about women but men tend overrate the opposite sex.
This isn’t 2000 anon. Most people use or have used a dating app. Even good looking people. All my good looking friends got fricks and dates from these apps. Us average guys get nothing.
no, it means women are delusional and rate men very harshly while men rate women realistically
I do not avoid women Mandrake...
But I do deny them my essence.
I don't hate them but I think that the concept of marriage and relationship is outdated. At least for me it is.
I honestly don't even care lol. I have everything. Career, home, car, 6ft, 6pack, 6inch+. 355 bench! 355! I don't care. I don't even remotely bother with women. Never have, and I'm 28! The best part is that I know tons of women who are ALONE. That's right, not even hooking up. But then again it must be hard to hook up when half of the males are gross Indians, lol! But they get what they deserve!
Frick women, not literally of course. Shoutout to all the bros and friends on here that simply DONT CARE.
you use that to soothe yourself while you jerk your little dick off to troony porn, leaf. not getting laid is pathetic.
I think this is a phenomenon of women fricking so many different guys.
women are designed to have only one mate.
If they have more than one, they don't compare their following future mates with their individual previous mates, but an amalgamation of the best traits of all their previous mates.
e.g.
>Tyrone had a 8" wiener
>Jeff had a 6 pack
>Tyler made $200k/year
>Matt was 6'3
>Noah was super handsome
In her mind she will not compare all future potential mates with just her past mates on an individual level, but all of them combined, so her next guy must have
>a bigger dick than Tyrone
>more defined muscles than Jeff
>higher income than Tyler
>taller than Matt
>more handsome than Noah
all in one.
and just failing in any individual of the listed aspects makes you a "subpar" mating choice and she'll rate you "below average" despite any man who fulfills just 3 out of the 5 listed requirements in this example easily being among the top 20% of men at least.
It simply comes from the fact that women control the supply of pussy. The only thing holding them in check before was patriarchy.
In more primitive times women would have no issue sharing one powerful man amongst themselves, and now we're back to that arrangement.
>In more primitive
you have to get reeeal primitive for that one though.
like pre-agricultural revolution, hunter-gatherer 10,000 BC primitive.
All civilized societies even in ancient times had some system of distribution for pussy.
Sure, the powerful rulers still had harems with dozens of women, usually the hottest ones, but they had to make sure that ~80ish% of his beta subjects also got some pussy.
Sure, but that's what I'm saying, we've gone back to primitive mating strategies.
In a very real sense civilisation can only be maintained when restricting women's behaviour.
12,000 years is nothing when you consider the fact that humans have been around for like 50 million years. 12,000 years is only like 0.01% of our evolution. We're very much the same as we were 12,000 years ago.
imagine being this moronic and inexperienced lmao
I don't see how this is an issue. If I go on Tinder right now, I have thousands of matches and thousands of men messaging me. Am I supposed to reply to all of them? Of course, I'm gonna find the hottest and initiate conversation. Would you bother with the ugly girls if you had that many people on Tinder giving you attention?
>Why do you hate women, anon?
I don't hate women.
I love women.
What I do hate/dislike is Feminists, "modern" women and masculine women.
My favorite type of woman is tomboys.
Tomboy is love, Tomboy is life.
Tomboy Supremacy FTW.
I don't know. I'm not exactly attracted to a man with a vegana either.
>I don't know. I'm not exactly attracted to a man with a vegana either.
"Man with a vegana"?
What?
Are you moronic? You 'avin a giggle m8?
A "Man with a vegana" is a masculine woman.
The exact opposite of a tomboy.
Here, you seem a bit moronic or misguided, so I'll explain the difference :
- Tomboy : A Tomboy is a Woman that ACTS feminine, but has generally Masculine interests.
- Masculine Woman : A Masculine Woman is a woman who ACTS like a man (Aggressive, Disagreable, Conflict-oriented, "I'm strong and independant) but has generally Feminine Interests.
Do you understand better now?
I agree on principle that "A Man with a vegana" s not attractive, but you're confusing Tomboys, which are Based and Feminine (where it counts) with Maculine (Modern/Feminist/BossBabe) Women who actually are masculinne and threfore unattractive.
If I said anything wrong, plase explain why.
Statistically it would appear I am entirely neutral about women.
bump
That woman scale is poor photoshop and inverted