Women would rather see a bear in the woods than a man, because a bear wouldn't rape and then kill her, and would most likely leave her alone and not stalk her. The worst thing a bear could do to a woman is maul her to death. All of this is backed by statistics (see https://twitter.com/PracticalBedlam/status/1784549551426154756). Don't ever tell me that male privilege doesn't exist.
A good video on the topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7urGFCqfj4c
 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
|
>worst thing a bear could do to a woman is maul her to death
This shows a lack of imagination. What if it ripped both her arms and legs off but she survived as just a torso? What if it broke her neck and she was permanently paralyzed from the neck down?
They're also underplaying "mauled to death".
Bears don't kill you, they eat you. They will eat your butthole and stomach first, and no amount of screaming or hitting will stop it from touring your body with it's jaws. Eventually you bleed to death, but not before experiencing the worst pain on earth.
As a straight man, I'd rather be ass-raped.
Hot bear maw sex
Missing the point. You are more likely to be injured by lightning in the US than to have a violent bear encounter.
So instead of dealing with men OR bears, we should just have women struck with lightning for their own safety.
Because we have bear safety protocols like not leaving food accessible. And when some idiot shows a bear that we are a food source men hunt it down and kill it. Here is what happens when dumb fricking women are in charge:
Because people don't usually encounter bears, you disingenuous frick. Try hanging around near a grizzly and then come back here and tell us all about how it went.
Fricktard
when you put hands on your girl, is it self defense cause she's bigger than you?
I would rather meet a bear in the woods than a women because I can meet women everywhere but not bears.
Unless she was cute, loving, fertile and played battle for wesnoth. Then I might meet her.
I'd rather rape the bear.
>my bear RAPES me while i sleep
>when that dog dick just ain't hitting the spot anymore
/thread
Just an other disgusting female sexual fantasy masquerading as ideological rhetoric.
What's the end goal of this sudden bear vs man shit?
God I fricking hate America, every single election year they make the western world a worse place
D&C i imagine.
I mean, think of all the men a woman will see while hiking that just say "howdy" and keep walking.
You're telling me the majority of women would rather be mauled than have a man walk past?
No way all women think this way, but they want you to think it and they want as many women as possible to echo it.
Male priviledge is the inherent strength and power Nature has gifted us with.
Women should recognize this and be rightfully fearful. Men are much more dangerous than bears, so naturally, women are much more afraid of men. Now, if only they followed this line of thought to its natural conclusion...
>Men are much more dangerous than bears
Frick off you moronic hole
We are. Maybe you're a noguns pussy but then you're not actually a man. Any real man has at least a rimfire or shotgun. You can get those in the UK.
You're a skinny little pussy.
Do we live in a bear civilization or a man civilization?
It'a actually flattering in a way, I wish I was the man they must be imagining
INSANE eyes
the wall must do brutal things to the mind
Any woman that would rather cross paths with a bear in the woods than me made the correct choice.
I am absolutely more dangerous than a bear. Keep your fricking distance, women. I’m violent as all frick and I can’t stand the sound of a woman’s goddamned voice anymore.
It used to be going to the woods was getting away from their voices. Even the cigar shop is full of women now. The only place left is Android store.
Jesus Christ you are so fricking old. Get the frick off of the computer grandpa, let the younger Indians do your job instead, Jesus this is embarrassing.
Oy vey!
Hit em with this
Right. Because every female loves troonys
No, but the söy homosexuals supporting these women do
Not every women wants the bear either. But the ones that do are def pretending they are okay with girl wiener
Yeah women are moronic and incapable of rational thought.
>Worst case scenario: man
Rapes and kills you
>Worst case scenario: bear
Mauls you to death
Either way, you die.
>but wahhh, rape is so much worse
Doesn’t matter, dead is still dead.
>Best case scenario: bear
The bear leaves you the frick alone and you’re still stranded in the middle of the woods
>Best case scenario: man
You’re in the woods with a survivorman hiker autist who builds you a log cabin and hunts rabbits and shit to feed you and guides you back to civilization
Anyone who thinks about the problem logically and understands basic game theory would pick the man every time .
replace man with illegal/"refugee" and you will have a funny turn from them on the matter so as to not appear racist
>Anyone who thinks about the problem logically and understands basic game theory
this
somehow I doubt pic related who popularised this "debate" are capable of either
they're right I am more dangerous than a bear that's what makes the sex so much better
no more brother wars
Just another case of women being absolute morons. A man is less safe than a bear because women are around men all the time. So there are way more situations for a woman to be victimized when they are around men. However, in scenarios where the man's/bear's presence is a given, it's much, much more safe to be around a man. Being around a bear is much more dangerous, there just aren't as many interactions between them and us. It is, yet again, a case of subhuman animals not understanding per capita.
Would women live in a society where bears are responsible for the sanitation system, construction, transportation and growing food?
At least the bears wouldn't exclude women from those sectors like men have, dude.
can't tell if sarcastic or not but there's nothing stopping women from entering these fields. they just don't want to and prefer cozy office jobs.
About that...
Inverse, I work in sanitation for food production. It's not the most glorified job, we're cleaning with hoses and chemicals. Every time my department has drama, it's usually because of some Queen Bee type mid 20s girl that's starting fights with other girls who don't like them. When we have our team that doesn't have people trying to remind you that their ego needing tended should take priority over the job. Even the older women on our team b***h about it because they're there to do a job and go home to their families. Not flirt their way to doing half their job while someone helps her out almost daily.
In my department which requires hardly any work, women still find a way to push some idiotic social hierarchy where they're immune to criticism, but also expecting their slack to be covered should they be having a bad day and see fit to partially do their job which doesn't cut it here. Random aside, the minute she learned I was a troony and not actually a girl she tried being my best friend despite being a royal c**t to me for "not backing her up because girls need to band together."
Women are okay in typically male dominated fields unless they try to inject gender politics into it. A guy raging at a rusted bolt not coming lose, calls it a stupid c**t in a fit of rage now has to worry about HR wanting a talk. Women morph the landscape and take men out of their element then punishing them for hilariously reacting emotionally but now they don't want men having feelings past subservient neediness.
>The worst thing a bear could do to a woman is maul her to death
And being eaten alive is somehow better than rape?
i agree, a bear might attack you on instinct or hunger but its just an animal it has no evil intentions, you have a far superior brain to a bear and can use weapons you are at an evolutionary advantage,
a man.... should he choose to do harm does so not on instinct but with malicious intent with all the savagery of a beast and cunning intellect of a man,
their is nothing more dangerous to a man than another man, and that is why men are always telling women to NOT FRICKING WALK ALONE,
feminists in their infinite moronation just take this as an ego challenge
Women get the entire calculus backwards and then shun their protectors for being scary and violent, while egotistically waltzing around strange horny brown morons. They'll quote shit like there being 30 murders of women here in the last 50 years, when statistically theRE SHOULD be MORE, or that women are likely to be killed by someone they know, just showing that how protected from even ingroup violence they are and up until recently, outgroup violence, that the only opportunity for someone to cause harm is their spouse.
It should be noted that their threshold for safety regarding rape that is stated in the video is based on the "new" rape definition, which also similar to anti-semitism reports, doesn't reclassify cases if they turn out to be fake.
I can smell eagles behind this demoralization psyop.
What are the odds that a bear mauls/eats you? Less than 100%. What are the odds that I maul and eat them? 100%, so they're right to choose the bear.
Of course women are going to choose the bear. They're tall, violent, and won't pay child support.
>They're tall, violent, and won't pay child support.
oooo just like Black folk
I'm going to use this dumb shit for a long time to prove women shouldn't be allowed to vote.
There's no way prostitutes would rather see a bear than their clients
Why should I care about women's opinion about anything?
Manufactured outrage
It's a conundrum using woman hubris as the premise.
It's the same question as: Would you let a man save you from drowning if it was your only solution.
It questions the woman capacity to perceive danger and quantify it.
It's being used to divide the population for absolutely no reason and have israelites written all over it. Very probably a Tavistock institute creation.
It's being astroturfed on internet and it's very fricking impressive whoever is being that spam is fricking relentless.
>whoever is behind that spam*
Yeah it's 4d political chess not just the 10 millionth dumb frick woman hypothetical virtue signal.
>Le CurReNt ThInG Is GrAsSrOoT bRo
it's astroturfed so bad it make the other spam look cheap
that question is forced on the public space don't be disingenuous
of course I can see at least 3 - 4 groups who largely profit from the divide between man and woman being exacerbated
the first one being your Bolshevik government
imagine how fricking vapid and moronic your population have to be
>full blown invasion going
>economy in full meltdown
>war everywhere
lel yeah but what if you hypothetically walked in the wood and hypothetically met a man or a bear bRo
What was the strategy with "how often do you think of the Roman Empire"?
some gnostic shenanigan?
Yeah not convinced, it's just dumb women doing dumb women shit. I've heard these hypotheticals for 30 years, it was no different pre internet. Last month it was the ask your boyfriend to peel an orange shit.
>Those hypotheticals
Like who would win between a robot shark and a genetically engineered rhinoceros who can breathe underwater in a 5 rounds fight?
Yeah. That was popular 15 years ago.
That kind of crap is astroturfed.
It's carefully crafted to manipulate perceptions.
You talk like a redditor and your shit's all moronic
For those who don't have Twitter: https://nitter.poast.org/PracticalBedlam/status/1784549551426154756
The question is hilarious because it shows how deranged women are and how little they care about the existence of men who dont want to rape them. The question is not "if you were stuck in the woods with a bear or a man trying to kill you" it is "if you were stuck in the woods with a bear or a man". Women are answering bear, because they actually do not remember the 500 interactions a day with men that had not made a comment to them. Those men simply don't exist in the mind of a femoid, leaving only the "creepy" guys they flick their bean to as possible men they could be stuck with.
Any woman who says the bear is an immediate dump. If the man was Vaush itd be a concern.
>Would you prefer to lives with Black person or white people
NOOOO NOOO YOU CAN'T DO THIS IT'S NOT WORKING
They wouldn't have a country with the right to talk shit on the internet if it weren't for men fighting and dying for that right. Too many believe that rights are simply bestowed upon you for living. They're taken by force.
Depends on the colour, also
Women are right
Trust the bear.
In thr woods, no law, no society, who cares what I do? I am capable of conquering the whole of the woods with my rationality.
The funny thing is that if I did so, females would then chose me over the bear. Haha weak beings. Will always be fearful and submissive creatures.
Also, how would she attract my attention if I were king of the woods? Through her natural attention whoring tendencies, haha
, pathetic.
Next question:
You're lost in the woods. Would you rather run into a black man or a black bear?
For some reason, I feel like there'd suddenly be a lot more hesitation to answer.
Has anyone actually ever seen a black person in the woods?
stop with this bear shit. no one cares what women or shitter think.